New Release Platform-App-Builder App Builder Questions

To test code against a subset of production data under 5 GB and to refresh the sandbox environment weekly, the most suitable type of sandbox is:

• Partial Copy (B). A Partial Copy sandbox includes a copy of your production org’s metadata and a subset of your production data as defined by the sandbox template. It allows up to 5 GB of data and can be refreshed every 5 days, making it ideal for scenarios where a representative sample of production data is needed for testing without the storage and refresh limitations of a Full Copy sandbox.

Developer Pro (A) and Developer (D) sandboxes also allow for testing and development but do not include a subset of production data—they either have no data or only limited sample data. A Full Copy sandbox (C) provides a full replica of production data, far exceeding the 5 GB requirement and generally is refreshed less frequently due to larger data volume and longer copy times.

Reference for sandbox types and their capabilities:

• Sandbox Types and Templates: https://help.salesforce.com/articleView?id=sf.data_sandbox_implementation_tips.htm&type=5

The app builder should use a custom button and Flow to achieve the desired result. A custom button is a button that can invoke custom logic or actions when clicked by a user. A Flow is a type of automation tool that can guide users through a series of screens and perform actions based on user input. In this case, the app builder can create a custom button on the Account object that launches a Flow when clicked by a user. The Flow can display a popup window with questions for the user to answer and populate additional fields on the Account record based on the user input4. Option A, B, and C are not tools that can achieve this result.

 Marking stage dependent fields as required on the Opportunity page layout is a good solution to improve efficiency and data quality, as it ensures that users enter the necessary information for each stage of the sales process. Adding a Path component with fields and instructions aligning to stages on the Opportunity is another good solution to improve efficiency and collaboration, as it provides guidance and best practices for users to move the Opportunity along the sales cycle. Using two Tabs components to separate record information from activities may not be an optimal solution, as it may reduce the visibility and accessibility of important data. Setting up an approval process requiring manager consent at each stage of the Opportunity may not be a feasible solution, as it may introduce unnecessary delays and complexity in the sales process

Using Process Builder on Opportunities and a Chatter post action, and enabling Feed Tracking on Opportunities are two configurations that an app builder can recommend to meet the requirement of notifying and tracking changes to an Opportunity Close Date. Process Builder can create a process that triggers a Chatter post action when the Close Date field is changed on an Opportunity. Feed Tracking can enable tracking of field history for the Close Date field on the Opportunity feed. Creating an Opportunity outbound message and activating Historical Trending for Opportunities are not valid configurations for this requirement.