App Builder Platform-App-Builder Syllabus Exam Questions Answers

Add the standard Chatter feed component is how an app builder can add the Chatter feed to a custom object record page. According to the Salesforce documentation, “The Chatter Feed component displays updates about records in your org.” Add the standard related list component, add a custom Chatter feed component, and add the Chatter feed component from the AppExchange are not valid or necessary options.

The Owner field on the Master record determines the ownership and sharing access of the detail record in a master-detail relationship. According to the Salesforce documentation, “The detail record inherits the sharing and security settings of its master record.” The default owner is not set in the parent object’s settings, the Owner field on the Detail record does not exist, and the owner is not set independently on the detail object’s settings.

 Removing the Delete permission from the Shipper profile and using a permission set to remove the Delete permission are both valid ways to prevent users from deleting delivery records. Removing the delete button from the Delivery page layout will not prevent users from deleting records using other methods, such as list views or reports. Changing the organization-wide default of deliveries to Private will not affect the delete permission, but only the sharing settings.

 The recommended solution to grant the customer service agent access to the field is creating a permission set that allows read-only access to the field via Field Level Security and assigning it to the agent. A permission set is a collection of settings and permissions that give users access to various tools and functions. Field Level Security (FLS) is a setting that controls the access level of fields for different profiles or permission sets. The app builder can create a permission set that grants read-only access to the custom field on the account object via FLS and assign it to the agent. Option B is incorrect because creating a new profile to allow for read-only access to the field via FLS and assigning it to the agent is not recommended, as profiles are used to define the baseline permissions and settings for a group of users, and creating multiple profiles for individual users can be hard to maintain. Option C is incorrect because updating the Customer Service Profile already assigned to the agent to allow for read-only access to the field via FLS is not recommended, as this will affect all users who have the same profile, which may violate the security policy. Option D is incorrect because updating the custom field’s FLS in setup to allow the agent read-only access to the field is not possible, as FLS can only be set at the profile or permission set level, not at the user level.