H12-891_V1.0 Exam Dumps : HCIE-Datacom V1.0

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

The IP prefix list configuration:

ip ip-prefix TEST permit 10.0.0.0 24 less-equal 30

10.0.0.0/24: Matches because it falls within the 10.0.0.0/24 prefix with the same prefix length (24).

10.0.1.0/24: Matches because it also falls within the /24 network range.

10.0.2.0/24: Matches for the same reason as the above.

10.0.0.1/30: Matches because it falls within the /24 prefix and its subnet length (30) is within the less-equal 30 range.

The prefix list permits any route that falls within the 10.0.0.0/24 network with a subnet mask ranging from /24 to /30. Therefore, all given routes are matched.

The command output shows:

* > i before both networks, which means these routes are the preferred routes (*) and are learned via internal BGP (i).

Two networks are listed: 3002::3 and 3002::4, which means R1 does have these two routes in its BGP IPv6 routing table.

For 3002::4, the path origin shows 65001 i, which means this route originated from AS 65001 and was learned through IBGP.

The AS Path attribute is only shown for 3002::4, but both routes are clearly present.

Therefore, the correct conclusion is:

D. R1 has routes 3002::3/128 and 3002::4/128.

In MPLS LDP, there are two types of sessions:

Direct LDP sessions: Established between directly connected LSRs using LDP Hellos over a link.

Remote LDP sessions (also called targeted LDP sessions): Established between non-directly connected LSRs. These require manual configuration of the remote peer.

In this scenario, SWA and SWC are not directly connected, so a remote (targeted) LDP session must be set up.

For a remote LDP session:

You must configure the remote peer using the command:

[SWA-MPLS-LDP] targeted-peer x.x.x.x

Where x.x.x.x is the LSR ID of SWC (33.3.3.3 in this case).

The current configuration does not include this required step.

Thus, the correct statement is:

D. You need to create a remote peer and specify an LSR ID for the remote peer.