IFSE Institute LLQP Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

When Jordan discovers that many of Nancy's employees are dissatisfied with the current group insurance plan, his first step should be toassess the employees' specific concerns. This includes understanding issues such as satisfaction with customer support and the claims turnaround time. Gathering feedback on these aspects will help Jordan identify the main areas of dissatisfaction and explore targeted solutions to improve the plan. The LLQP materials emphasize the importance of aligning group insurance plans with the needs and satisfaction of the participants, making this an essential step before considering any major changes such as switching insurers or altering the plan's structure​​.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Rene’s salary is $70,000/year, and his group disability insurance provides 60% of this, or $42,000/year ($70,000 × 0.60), equating to $3,500/month ($42,000 ÷ 12). His monthly expenses are $3,500, so this just covers his needs if disabled. However, the LLQP stresses considering unexpected expenses (e.g., medical costs, inflation) beyond basic living expenses (Chapter 2:Insurance to Protect Income).

RRSP contribution: $1,000/month, savings: $45,000 (registered) + $10,000 (non-registered).

40% of salary = $70,000 × 0.40 = $28,000/year or $2,333/month.

Option A: Incorrect; $3,500/month matches expenses but leaves no buffer for unforeseen costs.

Option B: Incorrect; RRSPs are for retirement, not disability liquidity, and don’t enhanceimmediate protection.

Option C: $1,000/month additional coverage is arbitrary and insufficient for 40% of salary; it doesn’t align with needs analysis.

Option D: Correct; 40% of salary ($2,333/month) on top of $3,500 provides $5,833/month, offering a safety net for unexpected expenses, consistent with LLQP’s holistic protection approach (Chapter 6:Client Profile).

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Monique seeks non-legal recourse after her disability claim denial. The OmbudService for Life & Health Insurance (OLHI) is a free, independent service resolving disputes between policyholders and insurers across Canada, including Quebec. The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) oversees Quebec’s insurance industry and handles consumer complaints (Distribution Act, Section 103). Option C combines these accessible options, ideal before legal action. Option A (Chambre de la sécurité financière and syndic) targets advisor misconduct, not insurer decisions. Option B (OSFI) regulates insurer solvency federally, not individual claims. Option D (CLHIA) is an industry association without complaint authority. The Ethics manual encourages advisors to inform clients of dispute resolution options like OLHI and AMF.