IFSE Institute CIFC Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The investment objective for the $10,000 currently sitting in Lucas’s RRSP is safety of principal, which means that he wants to preserve the value of his investment and avoid any loss of capital. Safety of principal is a suitable objective for Lucas because he plans to withdraw the money in two months for the LLP, which is a very short time horizon. He does not need to generate any income or growth from his investment, as he will use the money to pay for his education expenses. He also does not need to worry about tax-deferral, as the LLP allows him to withdraw money from his RRSP without paying any tax, as long as he meets the eligibility and repayment requirements1. Therefore, Lucas should invest his money in low-risk and liquid assets, such as money market securities or guaranteed investment certificates (GICs), that will protect his principal and ensure that he can access his funds when he needs them. References:

• Canadian Investment Funds Course (CIFC) Study Guide, Chapter 6: Registered Plans, Section 6.4: Lifelong Learning Plan (LLP), page 6-132
• Lifelong Learning Plan (LLP) - Canada.ca1

According to the Canadian Investment Funds Course, inflation is the general increase in the prices of goods and services over time. Inflation reduces the purchasing power of money, meaning that a dollar can buy less in the future than it can today. Inflation also affects the returns of fixed income investments, such as bonds, which pay a fixed amount of interest and principal. If inflation is higher than expected, the real rate of return (the nominal rate minus inflation) of a bond will be lower than anticipated.

In this case, Pippa purchased a 15-year bond with a 7% coupon rate at the time of issuance. The bond is due to mature later this year. The general interest rate climate remained stable for the first 13 years of the bond’s term. However, especially over the past 18 months, both inflation and general interest rates have increased more than expected. This means that Pippa will receive less purchasing power from her bond’s interest and principal payments than she expected when she bought the bond. She will not experience a capital loss, as she will receive the full face value of $5,000 at maturity. She will also not benefit from a higher real rate of return, as inflation erodes the value of her fixed payments. She will not receive any capital appreciation, as the bond’s price does not change once it is held to maturity.

Therefore, the correct answer is C. The return of investment capital will have lower purchasing power than prior to investing.

References: 1: Canadian Investment Funds Course - IFSE Institute 2 (Unit 4: Fixed Income Securities)

Whether the couple saves on income tax will be dependent on Minu’s marginal tax rate. Pension income splitting is a tax planning strategy that allows a spouse or common-law partner who receives eligible pension income to allocate up to 50% of that income to their spouse or common-law partner1. This may result in tax savings if the transferring spouse or common-law partner is in a higher tax bracket than the receiving spouse or common-law partner1. The tax savings depend on the difference between the marginal tax rates of the spouses or common-law partners1. The other statements are incorrect. Minu will not be exposed to a pension adjustment (PA) if she receives income from Saheed’s pension. A PA is a measure of the value of benefits accrued in a registered pension plan or deferred profit sharing plan during a calendar year2. It reduces the RRSP contribution room of the plan member, not the spouse or common-law partner who receives part of their pension income2. Pension income splitting is not a form of tax evasion and is not illegal based on income tax legislation. It is a legitimate way to reduce taxable income and taxes payable by shifting income from a higher-income spouse or common-law partner to a lower-income spouse or common-law partner1. Pension income splitting may change the total amount of income taxes paid by the couple, depending on their marginal tax rates. If the transferring spouse or common-law partner is in a higher tax bracket than the receiving spouse or common-law partner, pension income splitting may lower their combined taxes payable1. However, if they are in the same tax bracket, pension income splitting may not have any effect on their taxes payable1. References: Pension income splitting, Pension adjustment