LLQP Exam Dumps : Life License Qualification Program (LLQP)

In Quebec, an irrevocable beneficiary designation remains in effect even after a divorce, unless the policyholder takes steps to change it. Because Rajbir is designated as the irrevocable beneficiary, Surjit would require Rajbir’s consent to alter the beneficiary designation. Since Surjit intends to keep Rajbir as the beneficiary, he does not need to take any additional action, as the irrevocable beneficiary status remains in force. Surjit cannot change or remove Rajbir as the beneficiary without her consent, so his current designation remains unaffected by the divorce under LLQP guidelines and Quebec civil code rules on irrevocable beneficiaries​​.

=================

In this scenario, the policy was accepted and delivered to Cassie by Mason before her biopsy, indicating that she was considered insurable at the time of application. However, the insurance policy is subject to a two-year contestability period, during which the insurer can investigate the claim if they believe relevant information regarding the insured’s health was omitted or misrepresented.

According to LLQP guidelines, insurance contracts are built on the principle of utmost good faith, requiring that both the client and the representative disclose all material facts that may affect the insurance risk. If the insured's health status changes significantly between the application and delivery of the policy, it is the representative's duty to inform the insurer to reassess the risk​​.

In this case, Mason, as the insurance representative, failed to disclose Cassie’s new health condition, which is considered a material change to her insurability. Under LLQP ethics and practice standards, non-disclosure of this change can result in the insurer denying the claim, as it affected the underwriting decision​​.

Therefore, due to the lack of disclosure by Mason, the insurance company would have grounds to deny the claim based on this material change in insurability, aligning with LLQP provisions and insurance contract law.

==============

In cases where multiple insurers are involved in covering a large sum assured, it is common practice for each insurer to pay their respective portion of the death benefit directly to the beneficiary. Here, United Life insures $3 million and Extra Life insures the remaining $7 million. Upon Maxine’s death, each company is responsible for paying out their portion, meaning United Life will pay $3 million and Extra Life will pay $7 million directly to the beneficiary. Assuris, mentioned in Option D, is an industry-backed entity that provides protection in case of an insurer’s insolvency but does not issue death benefits​​​.