LLQP Exam Dumps : Life License Qualification Program (LLQP)

Eric has a shorter time horizon (3–5 years) and needs a lower-risk, more diversified investment approach suitable for saving for a house. A balanced fund spreads investments across stocks and bonds, helping reduce risk compared to the high volatility of a single-sector natural resources fund.

Exact Extract:

"Balanced funds combine equity and fixed-income investments to reduce portfolio volatility, providing moderate growth for investors with medium-term objectives."

(Reference: Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.2.5 Balanced Funds【49:1†Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.pdf**)

In Quebec, an irrevocable beneficiary designation remains in effect even after a divorce, unless the policyholder takes steps to change it. Because Rajbir is designated as the irrevocable beneficiary, Surjit would require Rajbir’s consent to alter the beneficiary designation. Since Surjit intends to keep Rajbir as the beneficiary, he does not need to take any additional action, as the irrevocable beneficiary status remains in force. Surjit cannot change or remove Rajbir as the beneficiary without her consent, so his current designation remains unaffected by the divorce under LLQP guidelines and Quebec civil code rules on irrevocable beneficiaries​​.

=================

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents and Guides:

In a joint first-to-die policy, the death benefit is paid to the surviving insured (primary beneficiary)upon the first death, unless altered. TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)states that beneficiary designations remain valid unless changed, and divorce does not automatically revoke them in most Canadian common law jurisdictions (unlike some family law contexts). Here, Chad is the primary beneficiary, and the adult children are secondary (contingent) beneficiaries, payable only if Chad predeceased Rachel. Since Rachel died first and the designation wasn’t updated post-divorce, Chad receives the benefit. Joint payment (A) or children claiming first (B) contradicts the primary/secondary structure, and Rachel’s parents (D) have no standing. Thus, C is correct.