Free and Premium Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 Dumps Questions Answers

Automated backups, will meet the requirement. Amazon RDS allows you to automatically create backups of your DB instance. Automated backups enable point-in-time recovery (PITR) for your DB instance down to a specific second within the retention period, which can be up to 35 days. By setting the retention period to 30 days, the company can restore the database to its state from up to 5 minutes before any change within the last 30 days.

&text=To%20encrypt%20an%20object%20at,S3%2C%20or%20SSE%2DKMS.

Since the application has no local data on instances, AMIs alone can meet the RPO by restoring instances from the most recent AMI backup. When combined with automated RDS backups for the database, this provides a complete backup solution for this environment. The other options involving EBS snapshots would be unnecessary given the stateless nature of the instances. AMIs provide all the backup needed for the app tier. This uses native, automated AWS backup features that require minimal ongoing management: - AMI automated backups provide point-in-time recovery for the stateless app tier. - RDS automated backups provide point-in-time recovery for the database.

Windows file server is on-premise and we need something to replicate the data to the cloud, the only option we have is AWS FSx for Windows File Server. Also, since the information is confidential and sensitive, we also want to make sure that the appropriate users have access to it in a secure

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling offers the ability to add lifecycle hooks to your Auto Scaling groups. These hooks let you create solutions that are aware of events in the Auto Scaling instance lifecycle, and then perform a custom action on instances when the corresponding lifecycle event occurs.

This option is the most efficient because it uses a predictive scaling policy for the Auto Scaling group, which isa type of scaling policy that uses machine learning to predict capacity requirements based on historical data from CloudWatch1. It also configures the policy to scale based on forecast, which enables the Auto Scaling group to adjust its capacity in advance of trafficchanges. It also sets the scaling metric to CPU utilization and the target value for the metric to 60%, which aligns with the baseline CPU utilization that is noted on each run. It also sets the instances to pre-launch 30 minutes before the jobs run, which ensures that enough capacity is provisioned before the weekly scripted batch jobs start. This solution meets the requirement of provisioning the capacity 30 minutes before the jobs run with the leastoperational overhead. Option A is less efficient because it uses a dynamic scaling policy for the Auto Scaling group, which is a type of scaling policy that adjusts your Auto Scaling group’s capacity in response to changing demand2. However, this does not provide a way to provision the capacity 30 minutes before the jobs run, as it only reacts to changing traffic. Option B is less efficientbecause it uses a scheduled scaling policy for the Auto Scaling group, which is a type of scaling policy that lets you scale your Auto Scaling group based on a schedule that you create3. However, this does not provide a way to scale based on forecast or CPU utilization, as it only scales based on predefined metrics and policies. Option D is less efficient because it uses an Amazon EventBridge event to invoke an AWS Lambda function when the CPU utilization metric value for the Auto Scaling group reaches 60%, which is a way to trigger serverless functions based on events. However, this does not provide a way to provision the capacity 30 minutes before the jobs run, as it only reacts to changing traffic.

The solution that meets the requirements with the least operational overhead is to create a **Regional AWS WAF web ACL with a rate-based rule** and associate the web ACL with the API Gateway stage. This solution will protect the application from HTTP flood attacks by monitoring incoming requests and blocking requests from IP addresses that exceed the predefined rate. Amazon CloudFront distribution with Lambda@Edge in front of the API Gateway Regional API endpoint is also a good solution but it requires more operational overhead than the previous solution. Using Amazon CloudWatch metrics to monitor theCount metric and alerting the security team when the predefined rate is reached is not a solution that can protect against HTTP flood attacks. Creating an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the API Gateway Regional API endpoint with a maximum TTL of 24 hours is not a solution that can protect against HTTP flood attacks.

Option A is the most appropriate solution for reducing replication lag without significant changes to the application code and minimizing ongoing operational overhead. Migrating the database to Amazon Aurora MySQL allows for improved replication performance and higher scalability compared to Amazon RDS for MySQL. Aurora Replicas provide faster replication, reducing the replication lag, and Aurora Auto Scaling ensures that there are enough Aurora Replicas to handle the incoming traffic. Additionally, Aurora MySQL native functions can replace the stored procedures, reducing the load on the database and improving performance.

Auto scaling storage RDS will ease storage issues and migrating Oracle Pl/Sql to Aurora is cumbersome. Also Aurora has auto storage scaling by

Use AWS Batch on Amazon EC2. AWS Batch is a fully managed batch processing service that can be used to easily run batch jobs on Amazon EC2 instances. It can scale the number of instances to match the workload, allowing the batch job to be completed in the desired time frame with minimal operational overhead.

Using AWS Lambda with Amazon API Gateway - AWS Lambda

AWS Lambda FAQs

Create an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system. Mount the EFS file system on all web servers. To meet the requirements of providing a shared file store for Linux-based web servers without making changes to the application, using an Amazon EFS file system is the best solution. Amazon EFS is a managed NFS file system service that provides shared access to files across multiple Linux-based instances, which makes it suitable for this use case. Amazon S3 is not ideal for this scenario since it is an object storage service and not a file system, and it requires additional tools or libraries to mount the S3 bucket as a filesystem. Amazon CloudFront can be used to improve content delivery performance but is not necessary for this requirement. Additionally, Amazon EBS volumes can only be mounted to one instance at a time, so it is not suitable for sharing files across multiple instances.

Amazon S3 is a highly scalable, durable, and cost-effective object storage service that can store millions of images1. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database that can handle high throughput and low latency for key-value and document data2. By using S3 to store the images and DynamoDB to store the geographic codes and image S3 URLs, the solution can achieve high availability and scalability during natural disasters. It can alsoleverage DynamoDB’s features such as caching, auto-scaling, and global tables to improve performance and reduce costs2.

A. Store the images and geographic codes in a database table Use Oracle running on an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ DB instance. This solution willnot meet the requirement of scalability and cost-effectiveness, as Oracle is a relational database that may not handle large volumes of unstructured data such as images efficiently3. It also involves higher licensing and operational costs than S3 and DynamoDB12.

C. Store the images and geographic codes in an Amazon DynamoDB table Configure DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) during times of high load. This solution willnot meet therequirement of cost-effectiveness, as storing images in DynamoDB will consume more storage space and incur higher charges than storing them in S312. It will also require additional configuration and management of DAX clusters to handle high load.

D. Store the images in Amazon S3 buckets Store geographic codes and image S3 URLs in a database table Use Oracle running on an Amazon RDS Multi-AZ DB instance. This solution will not meet the requirement of scalability and cost-effectiveness, asOracle is a relational database that may not handle high throughput and low latency for key-value data such as geographic codes efficiently3. It also involves higher licensing and operational costs than DynamoDB2.

Reference URL:

The best option to improve the security of the data in transit is to configure a TLS listener and deploy the server certificate on the NLB. This will ensure that the data is encrypted and secure as it travels through the network. Additionally, you could also configure AWS Shield Advanced and enable AWS WAF on the NLB to further protect the network from malicious attacks. Alternatively, you could also change the load balancer to an Application Load Balancer (ALB) and enable AWS WAF on the ALB. Finally, you could also encrypt the Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volume on the EC2 instances by using AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS).

You must specify an SSL certificate for a TLS listener. The load balancer uses the certificate to terminate the connection and decrypt requests from clients before routing them to

Amazon RDS for MySQL is a fully-managed relational database service that makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale MySQL deployments in the cloud. Amazon Aurora Serverless is an on-demand, auto-scaling configuration for Amazon Aurora (MySQL-compatible edition), where the database will automatically start up, shut down, and scale capacity up or down based on your application’s needs. It is a simple, cost-effective option for infrequent, intermittent, or unpredictable workloads.

AWS Batch is a fully managed service that enables users to run batch jobs on AWS. It can handle different types of tasks written in different languages and run them on EC2 instances. It also integrates with Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) to schedule jobs based on time or event triggers. This solution will meet the requirements of performance, scalability and low operational overhead12.

B. Convert the EC2 instance to a container. Use AWS App Runner to create the container on demand to run the tasks as jobs. This solution will not meet the requirement of low operational overhead, as it involves converting the EC2 instance to a container and using AWS App Runner, which is a service that automatically builds and deploys web applications and load balances traffic2. This is not necessary for running batch jobs.

C. Copy the tasks into AWS Lambda functions. Schedule the Lambda functions by using Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events). This solution will not meet the requirement of performance, as AWS Lambda has a limit of 15 minutes for execution timeand 10 GB for memory allocation3. These limits may not be sufficient for running 1-hour tasks.

D. Create an Amazon Machine Image (AMI) of the EC2 instance that runs the tasks. Create an Auto Scaling group with the AMI to run multiple copies of the instance. This solution will not meet the requirement of low operational overhead, as it involves creating and maintaining AMIs and Auto Scaling groups, which are additional resources that need to be configured and managed2.

Reference URL:

Restricting inbound access to the web servers to only port 443, which is used for HTTPS traffic, and allowing access from any IP address (0.0.0.0/0), since the application is public and accessible for global customers.

Restricting inbound access to the DB instance to only port 3306, which is used for MySQL traffic, and allowing access only from the security group of the web servers, which creates a secure connection between the two tiers and prevents unauthorized access to the database.

Restricting outbound access to the minimum required for both tiers, which is not specified in the question but can be assumed to be similar to the inbound rules.

- First 30 days- data access every morning ( predictable and frequently) – S3 standard - After 30 days, accessed 4 times a year – S3 infrequently access - Data preserved- S3 Gllacier Deep Archive

Amazon Inspector:

• Performs active vulnerability scans of EC2 instances. It looks for software vulnerabilities, unintended network accessibility, and other security issues.

• Requires installing an agent on EC2 instances to perform scans. The agent must be deployed to each instance.

• Provides scheduled scan reports detailing any findings of security risks or vulnerabilities. These reports can be used to patch or remediate issues.

• Is best suited for proactively detecting security weaknesses and misconfigurations in your AWS environment.

"Sensitive data redaction replaces personally identifiable information (PII) in the text transcript and the audio file. A redacted transcript replaces the original text with [PII]; a redacted audio file replaces spoken personal information with silence. This parameter is useful for protecting customer information."

To improve the architecture of this application, the best solution would be to use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to buffer the requests and decouple the S3 bucket from the Lambda function. This will ensure that the documents are not lost and can be processed at a later time if the Lambda function is not available. This will ensure that the documents are not lost and can be processed at a later time if the Lambda function is not available. By using Amazon SQS, the architecture is decoupled and the Lambda function can process the documents in a scalable and fault-tolerant manner

There's no need to create another custom AWS KMS key. Give target account access to the custom AWS KMS key within the source account 1. Log in to the source account, and go to the AWS KMS console in the same Region as the DB cluster snapshot. 2. Select Customer-managed keys from the navigation pane. 3. Select your custom AWS KMS key (ALREADY CREATED) 4. From the Other AWS accounts section, select Add another AWS account, and then enter the AWS account number of your target account. Then: Copy and share the DB cluster snapshot

This option is the most efficient because it requests an Amazon issued public certificate from AWS Certificate Manager (ACM), which is a service that lets you easily provision,manage, and deploy public and private SSL/TLS certificates for use with AWS services and your internal connected resources1. It also requests the certificate in the us-east-1 Region, which is required for using an ACM certificate with CloudFront2. It also meets therequirement of deploying the certificate without incurring any additional costs, as ACM does not charge for certificates that are used with supported AWS services3. This solution meets the requirement of configuring its CloudFront distribution to use SSL/TLS certificates and using a different domain name for the distribution. Option A is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued private certificate from ACM, which is a type of certificate that can be used only within your organization or virtual private cloud (VPC). However, this does not meet the requirement of configuring its CloudFront distribution to use SSL/TLS certificates, as CloudFront requires a public certificate. It also requests the certificate in the us-east-1 Region, which is correct. Option B is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued private certificate from ACM, which is incorrect for the same reason as option A. It also requests the certificate in the us-west-1 Region, which is incorrect as CloudFront requires a certificate in the us-east-1 Region. Option D is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued public certificate from ACM, which is correct. However, it requests the certificate in the us-west-1 Region, which is incorrect as CloudFront requires a certificate in the us-east-1 Region.

A Network Load Balancer is a type of load balancer that operates at the connection level (Layer 4) and can load balance both TCP and UDP traffic1. A Network Load Balancer is suitable for scenarios where high performance and low latency are required, such as real-time multiplayer games1. A Network Load Balancer can also handle sudden and volatile traffic patterns while using a single static IP address per Availability Zone1.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should use a Network Load Balancer for traffic distribution between the EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group. The Network Load Balancer can route UDPtraffic from the client to the servers onthe appropriate port2. TheNetwork Load Balancer can also support TLS offloading for secure communications between the client and servers1.

Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that can store and retrieve any amount of data with consistent performance and low latency3. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand is a flexible billing option that requires no capacity planning and charges only for the read and write requests that are performed on the tables3. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand is ideal forscenarios where the application traffic is unpredictable or sporadic, such as gaming applications3.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should use Amazon DynamoDB on-demand for data storage. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand can store gamer scores and other non-relational data without intervention from the developers. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand can also scale automatically to handle any level of requesttraffic without affecting performance or availability3.

In order to address scalability and to provide a shared data storage for sessions that can be accessible from any individual web server, you can abstract the HTTP sessions from the web servers themselves. A common solution to for this is to leverage an In-Memory Key/Value store such as Redis and Memcached. ElastiCache offerings for In-Memory key/value stores includeElastiCache for Redis, which can support replication, and ElastiCache for Memcached which does not support replication.

To meet the company's requirements of having a resilient solution that can process orders automatically in case of a system outage, the solutions architect needs to implement a fault-tolerant architecture. Based on the given scenario, a potential solution is to move the EC2 instances into an Auto Scaling group and configure the order system to send messages to an Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) queue. The EC2 instances can then consume messages from the queue.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Protect against SQL injection and cross-site scripting To protect your applications against SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, use the built-in SQL injection and cross-site scripting engines. Remember that attacks can be performed ondifferent parts of the HTTP request, such as the HTTP header, query string, or URI. Configure the AWS WAF rules to inspect different parts of the HTTP request against the built-in mitigation engines.

To resolve the issue of slow page loads for a rapidly growing e-commerce website hosted on AWS, a solutions architect can take the following two actions:

1. Set up an Amazon CloudFront distribution

2. Create a read replica for the RDS DB instance

Configuring an Amazon Redshift cluster is not relevant to this issue since Redshift is a data warehousing service and is typically used for the analytical processing of large amounts of data.

Hosting the dynamic web content in Amazon S3 may not necessarily improve performance since S3 is an object storage service, not a web application server. While S3 can be used to host static web content, it may not be suitable for hosting dynamic web content since S3 doesn't support server-side scripting or processing.

Configuring a Multi-AZ deployment for the RDS DB instance will improve high availability but may not necessarily improve performance.

Move the data objects to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) after 30 days - will meet the requirements of keeping the data immediately accessible with high availability andresiliency, while minimizing storage costs. S3 Standard-IA is designed for infrequently accessed data, and it provides a lower storage cost than S3 Standard, while still offering the same low latency, high throughput, and high durability as S3 Standard.

The best solution to meet these requirements with the least amount of operational overhead is to enable Amazon DynamoDB Streams on the table and use triggers to write to a single AmazonSimple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to which the teams can subscribe. This solution requires minimal configuration and infrastructure setup, and Amazon DynamoDB Streams provide a low-latency way to capture changes to the DynamoDB table. The triggers automatically capture the changes and publish them to the SNS topic, which notifies the internal teams.

Many applications, including those built on modern serverless architectures, can have a large number of open connections to the database server and may open and close database connections at a high rate, exhausting database memory and compute resources. Amazon RDS Proxy allows applications to pool and share connections established with the database, improving database efficiency and application scalability.

By purchasing a Compute Savings Plan, the company can save on the costs of running both EC2 instances and Lambda functions. The Lambda functions can be connected to the private subnet that contains the EC2 instances through a VPC endpoint for AWS services or a VPC peering connection. This provides direct network access to the EC2 instances while keeping the traffic within the private network, which helps to minimize network latency. Optimizing the Lambda functions’ duration, memory usage, number of invocations, and amount of data transferred can help to further minimize costs and improve performance. Additionally, using a private subnet helps to ensure that the EC2 instances are not directly accessible from the public internet, which is a security best practice.

"A common use case for AWS Step Functions is a task that requires human intervention (for example, an approval process). Step Functions makes it easy to coordinate the componentsof distributed applications as a series of steps in a visual workflow called a state machine. You can quickly build and run state machines to execute the steps of your application in a reliable and scalable fashion. "

Amazon Transcribe now supports speaker labeling for streaming transcription. Amazon Transcribe is an automatic speech recognition (ASR) service that makes it easy for you to convert speech-to-text. In live audio transcription, each stream of audio may contain multiplespeakers. Now you can conveniently turn on the ability to label speakers, thus helping to identify who is saying what in the output

A) Enable AWS CloudTrail and use it for auditing. AWS CloudTrail provides a record of API calls and can be used to audit changes made to EC2 instances and security groups. By analyzing CloudTrail logs, the solutions architect can track who provisioned oversized instances ormodified security groups without proper approval. D) Enable AWS Config and create rules for auditing and compliance purposes. AWS Config can record the configuration changes made to resources like EC2 instances and security groups. The solutions architect can create AWS Config rules to monitor for non-compliant changes, like launching certain instance types or opening security group ports without permission. AWS Config would alert on any violations of these rules.

This option is the most efficient because it uses Cost Explorer, which is a tool that allowsyou to visualize, understand, and manage your AWS costs and usage over time1. You can create a report in CostExplorer that lists AWS billed items by user, using the user name tag as a filter2. You can then download the report as a CSV file and use it for budget planning. Option A is less efficient because it uses Amazon Athena, which is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL3. You would need to set up an Athena table that points to your AWS Cost and Usage Report data in S3, and then run a query to generate the report. This would incur additional costs and complexity. Option C is less efficient because it uses the billing dashboard, which provides a high-level summary of your AWS costsand usage. You can access the bill details from the billing dashboard and download them via bill, but this would not list the billed items by user. You would need to use tags to group your costs by user name, which would require additional steps. Option D is less efficient because it uses AWS Budgets, which is a tool that allows you to plan your service usage, service costs, and instance reservations. You can modify a cost budget in AWS Budgets to alert with Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES), but this would not generate a report of AWS billed items by user. This would only notify you when your actual or forecasted costs exceed or are expected to exceed your budgeted amount.

To securely access AWS services like S3 and Secrets Manager from a private VPC without using public IPs, interface VPC endpoints are required. These endpoints are accessible via private IP addresses. For the application to reach these endpoints, appropriate routes must be configured in the route table.

Detailed Explanation:

A. RDS:Suitable for relational databases but does not provide native support for data lakes or row-level access.

B. Redshift:Primarily for analytics, not designed for large-scale data lake governance.

C. S3 + Lake Formation:Provides native support for data lakes with granular access control, including row-level permissions.

D. Glue Catalog + DataBrew:Focused on data preparation and metadata management, not row-level access control.

Key Requirements:

Serverless architecture.

Handle traffic bursts with high availability.

Process orders asynchronouslyin the order they are received.

Analysis of Options:

Option A:Amazon SNS delivers messages to subscribers. However, SNS does not ensure ordering, making it unsuitable for FIFO (First In, First Out) requirements.

Option B:Amazon SQS FIFO queues support ordering and ensure messages are delivered exactly once. AWS Lambda functions can be triggered by SQS to process messages asynchronously and efficiently. This satisfies all requirements.

Option C:Amazon SQS standard queues do not guarantee message order and have "at-least-once" delivery, making them unsuitable for the FIFO requirement.

Option D:Similar to Option A, SNS does not ensure message ordering, and using AWS Batch adds complexity without directly addressing the requirements.

AWS References:

Amazon SQS FIFO Queues

AWS Lambda and SQS Integration

Why Option B is Correct:

HTTP Proxy Integration: Passes XML requests directly to the application, which already supports XML.

JSON Conversion: An AWS Lambda function converts JSON requests to XML and calls the application.

API Gateway: Acts as a front end to handle JSON requests and integrates seamlessly with Lambda for the transformation process.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option A: Suggests using API Gateway mappings to convert JSON to XML. API Gateway mapping templates are limited in functionality and are not ideal for complex transformations.

Option C and D: Use HTTP custom integration unnecessarily, which adds complexity without additional benefits.

AWS References:

Amazon API Gateway Integration:AWS Documentation - API Gateway Integration

AWS Lambda:AWS Documentation - Lambda

Field-level encryption in Amazon CloudFront provides end-to-end encryption for specific data fields (e.g., credit card numbers, social security numbers). It ensures that sensitive fields are encrypted at the edge before being forwarded to the origin, and only the authorized application with the private key can decrypt them.

This adds a layer of protection beyond HTTPS, which encrypts the whole payload but not individual fields. Signed URLs and cookies are for access control, not encryption. Setting HTTPS Only is a good practice but does not satisfy the field-specific encryption requirement.

AWS Firewall Manager integrates with AWS Organizations to centrally manage and apply security group policies, AWS WAF rules, and AWS Shield Advanced protections. It automates the propagation of rules across accounts and Regions and can also audit and remediate noncompliant configurations.

Analysis:

The solution must handle variable sales volumes, preserve transaction information, and store data in an Amazon Aurora database with minimal operational overhead. UsingAPI Gateway, AWS Lambda, and SQSis the best option because it provides scalability, reliability, and resilience.

Why Option A is Correct:

API Gateway: Serves as an entry point for transaction data in a serverless, scalable manner.

AWS Lambda: Processes the transactions and sends them to Amazon SQS for queuing.

Amazon SQS: Buffers the transaction data, ensuring durability and resilience against spikes in transaction volume.

Second Lambda Function: Processes messages from the SQS queue and updates the Aurora database, decoupling the workflow for better scalability.

Dead-Letter Queue (DLQ): Ensures failed transactions are logged for later debugging or reprocessing.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option B:

Using an ALB with ECS on EC2 introduces operational overhead, such as managing EC2 instances and scaling ECS tasks.Not cost-effective.

Option C:

EKS is highly operationally intensive and requires Kubernetes cluster management, which is unnecessary for this use case.Too complex.

Option D:

Amazon Data Firehose and DMS are not designed for real-time transactional workflows. They are better suited for data analytics pipelines.Not suitable.

AWS References:

Amazon API Gateway:AWS Documentation - API Gateway

AWS Lambda:AWS Documentation - Lambda

Amazon SQS:AWS Documentation - SQS

Amazon Aurora:AWS Documentation - Aurora

Using API Gateway and Lambda enables serverless handling of form submissions with minimal cost and infrastructure. When coupled with Amazon SNS, it allows instant email notifications without running servers, making it ideal for low-traffic workloads.

AWS Secrets Manager is the recommended service for managing and automatically rotating database credentials. It integrates natively with Amazon RDS (including PostgreSQL), supports built-in rotation functionality, and requires minimal setup.

Secrets Manager also supports versioning and auditing, which enhances operational excellence and security. Parameter Store does not natively support credential rotation. AWS KMS manages key encryption—not application secrets—so it is not applicable here.

Why Option D is Correct:

IAM Roles with Instance Profiles: Allow applications to access AWS services securely without hardcoding long-term access keys.

Short-Term Credentials: IAM roles issue short-term credentials dynamically managed by AWS.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option A and B: Embedding or retrieving long-term access keys introduces security risks and operational overhead.

Option C: Combining IAM roles with Parameter Store adds unnecessary complexity.

AWS References:

IAM Roles and Instance Profiles:AWS Documentation - IAM Roles

DAX does not support enabling encryption at rest on an existing cluster. To use encryption at rest, you must create a new DAX cluster with encryption enabled at creation time and migrate workloads accordingly.

Incremental Exports: Exporting DynamoDB data directly to Amazon S3 provides an automated, serverless way to make data available for analytics without operational overhead.

Analytics-Friendly Storage: Amazon S3 supports long-term analytics workloads and can integrate with tools like Athena or QuickSight.

DynamoDB Export to S3 Documentation

Converting the existing DynamoDB table to aglobal tableprovides active-active replication and low-latency reads and writes in both Regions. DynamoDB global tables are specifically designed for multi-Region and multi-active use cases.

Option A:GSIs do not provide multi-Region replication or active-active capabilities.

Option B and D:Using DynamoDB Streams and custom replication is less operationally efficient than global tables and introduces additional complexity.

AWS Documentation References:

DynamoDB Global Tables

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

To securely migrate an on-premises Oracle database to Amazon Aurora, the following steps are recommended:

Use AWS Schema Conversion Tool (AWS SCT) and AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS): AWS SCT helps convert the source database schema to a format compatible with the target database (Aurora). AWS DMS facilitates the actual data migration, ensuring minimal downtime and data integrity.

Use AWS Site-to-Site VPN: Establishing a Site-to-Site VPN connection provides a secure and encrypted tunnel between the on-premises environment and AWS. This ensures that data transferred during the migration is protected against interception and unauthorized access.

Aurora PostgreSQL supports the pgvector extension, which allows storage and querying of vector embeddings directly inside the database. This eliminates the need for external vector databases and provides cost-effective and performant integration for AI workloads.

Export Requirements:

To export data from DynamoDB to Amazon S3, point-in-time recovery (PITR) must be enabled for the tables. This feature creates a snapshot of the data, which is essential for exports.

Incorrect Options Analysis:

Option B: S3 buckets and DynamoDB tables do not need to be in the same region for exports.

Option C: DynamoDB streams are unrelated to the export functionality.

Option D: DAX accelerates reads but has no role in exports.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

The goal is totransfer 500 GB dailyfrom multiple global locationsquicklyintoa single S3 bucketwhile keeping operational complexity low.

Option A:✅

Turn on S3 Transfer Acceleration on the destination S3 bucket. Use multipart uploads to directly upload site data to the destination S3 bucket.

S3 Transfer Acceleration (S3-TA)allowsfasterglobal uploads by routing traffic throughAmazon CloudFront’s globally distributed edge locations.

Multipart uploadsimprove efficiency bybreaking large filesinto smaller parts, transferring them in parallel.

Low operational complexity: No need for additional resources or manual replication.

Why is this best?It ensureshigh-speed transferswhileminimizing complexity.

Amazon SQS provides durable, decoupled message storage for distributed systems. Using SQS as a job queue enables each EC2 instance to process a message independently. Scaling the Auto Scaling group based on the SQS queue length ensures parallelism and elasticity, aligning compute resources with workload volume.

AWS Backup supports cross-Region backup for Amazon EFS, allowing automated, scheduled backups and replication to another Region. This managed service simplifies backup management and ensures data resilience without the need for custom scripts or manual processes

Amazon EBS Snapshots Recycle Bin enables you to specify retention rules for EBS snapshots based on tags. When snapshots are deleted, they are retained in the Recycle Bin for a specified duration, preventing accidental deletion. Tag-level rules allow selective protection without changing IAM roles or user permissions.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

The requirement is toprevent data deletion by any user, including administrators, for 7 years while allowing automatic deletion afterward.

S3 Object Lock in Compliance Mode (Correct Choice - C)

Compliance mode ensures that even the root user cannot delete or modify the objects during the retention period.

After 7 years, the S3 Lifecycle policy automatically deletes the objects.

This meets bothimmutability and automatic deletionrequirements.

Governance Mode (Option B - Incorrect)

Governance mode prevents deletion,but administrators can override it.

The requirement explicitly states thateven administrators must not be able to delete the data.

S3 Bucket Policy (Option A - Incorrect)

An S3 bucket policy candeny deletes, but policies can be modified at any time by administrators.

It does not enforce strict retention like Object Lock.

S3 Batch Operations Job (Option D - Incorrect)

A legal hold does not have an automatic expiration.

Legal holds must be manually removed, which is not efficient.

Why Option C is Correct:

S3 Object Lock in Compliance Mode prevents deletion by all users, including administrators.

The S3 Lifecycle policy deletes the data automatically after 7 years, reducing operational overhead.

Edge-Optimized API: Designed for global users by routing requests through CloudFront's edge locations, reducing latency.

Content Encoding: Enabling content encoding compresses data, further optimizing performance by decreasing payload size.

Caching: Adding API Gateway caching reduces the number of calls to Lambda and database backends, improving latency.

Reserved Concurrency: Although useful, this does not directly affect latency for transferring static and dynamic content.

AWS API Gateway Edge-Optimized APIs Documentation

For predictable workloads requiring a relational database, Amazon RDS for MySQL offers a managed, cost-effective solution. Storing product images in Amazon S3 is highly durable and cost-efficient, especially for static assets like images. This combination leverages managed services to reduce operational overhead and costs.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

To handle increased loads effectively, it's essential to implement Auto Scaling for both frontend and backend tiers:

Frontend Auto Scaling Group: Scaling based on incoming network traffic ensures that the application can handle increased user requests.

Backend Auto Scaling Group: Scaling based on the Amazon SQS queue backlog ensures that the backend can process messages as they arrive, preventing delays.

This approach allows each tier to scale independently based on its specific load, ensuring optimal resource utilization and performance.

By exporting AWS Cost and Usage Reports (CUR) to Amazon S3 and analyzing them with Amazon QuickSight, companies can generate interactive visual dashboards. This solution is fully AWS-managed, requires no third-party tools, and integrates deeply with AWS cost data.

AWS Lake Formationis designed for managing fine-grained access control to data in an efficient manner:

Granular Permissions: Lake Formation allows column-level, row-level, and table-level access controls, which can precisely define access to PII data.

Integration with AWS Glue Catalog: Lake Formation natively integrates with AWS Glue for seamless data cataloging and access control.

Operational Efficiency: Centralized access control policies minimize the need for separate IAM roles or policies.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option A:

Creating multiple IAM policies introduces complexity and lacks column-level access control.Not efficient.

Option B:

Managing multiple IAM roles for granular access is operationally complex.Not efficient.

Option D:

Creating views in Glue adds unnecessary complexity and may not provide the level of granularity that Lake Formation offers.Not the best choice.

AWS References:

AWS Lake Formation:AWS Documentation - Lake Formation

Fine-Grained Permissions with Lake Formation:AWS Documentation - Fine-Grained Permissions

Background Jobs with Event Invocation Type:

The Event invocation type is asynchronous, meaning the Lambda function does not send an immediate result to the API Gateway and processes the request in the background. This is ideal for video encoding tasks that take time.

REST API vs. HTTP API:

REST APIs support advanced features like API keys, request validation, and throttling that HTTP APIs do not support fully.

Since the developer needs API keys and request validations, a REST API is the correct choice.

Integration with Lambda:

AWS Lambda integration is seamless with REST APIs, and using the Event invocation ensures asynchronous processing.

Incorrect Options Analysis:

Option A: HTTP API lacks full support for API keys and validation.

Option CandD: RequestResponse invocation type requires immediate responses, unsuitable for background jobs.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

To track costs associated with different teams within a single AWS account, the company should implement user-defined cost allocation tags.

Tagging Resources with CostCenter: Assign the CostCenter tag to all resources, specifying the appropriate value for each team. This practice enables the organization to categorize and track AWS costs effectively.

Activating the CostCenter Tag: After tagging resources, activate the CostCenter tag in the AWS Billing and Cost Management console. Activation is necessary for the tags to appear in cost allocation reports and AWS Cost Explorer.

By following these steps, the company can generate detailed billing reports that break down costs by team, facilitating better cost management and accountability.

Amazon Macie is a fully managed data security and data privacy service that uses machine learning and pattern matching to discover and protect sensitive data in AWS. To scale across Regions and accounts in AWS Organizations, Macie supports delegated administration, automated sensitive data discovery, and multi-account aggregation through a centralized admin account.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

The requirement is toprevent Application A from sending traffic to Application B.

Understanding AWS Network Security Components:

Security Groups

Stateful(if traffic is allowed in one direction, it is automatically allowed in the reverse).

Do not support explicit deny rules, onlyallow rules.

Not suitable for blocking traffic in this scenario.

Network ACLs (NACLs)

Stateless(must define explicit rules for both inbound and outbound traffic).

Support explicit DENY rules.

Best suited for blocking traffic between subnets.

Analysis of the Options:

Option A: Deny Outbound Rule in Security Group for Application B❌(Incorrect)

Security Groups do not support explicit deny rules.

Does not block traffic from Application A to Application B.

Option B: Deny Outbound Rule in Security Group for Application A❌(Incorrect)

Security Groups do not support explicit deny rules.

Cannot effectively prevent Application A from sending traffic to Application B.

Option C: Deny Outbound Rule in NACL for Application B Subnet❌(Incorrect)

This wouldprevent Application B from sending traffic, butthe requirement is to block traffic from Application A to Application B.

Incorrect subnet is being modified.

Option D: Deny Outbound Rule in NACL for Application A Subnet✅(Correct Choice)

Prevents Application A from sending traffic to Application B by blocking outbound requests at the network level.

Effectively stops communication from A to B at the subnet level.

Why Option D is the Best Choice?

✅NACLs support explicit deny rules, unlike security groups.✅Blocks outbound traffic from Application A before it reaches Application B.✅Works at the subnet level, making it scalable.

Why Option C is Correct:

S3 Access Points: Provide scalable management of access to large datasets with specific permissions for individual prefixes.

Dynamic Prefixes: Access points simplify managing access to a growing number of prefixes without relying solely on a single bucket policy.

Fine-Grained Control: Resource-based permissions on access points enforce prefix-level isolation effectively.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option A: Using deny/allow bucket policies introduces complexity and is less scalable for dynamic prefixes.

Option B: Encryption ensures data security but does not address access management.

Option D: Pre-signed URLs are temporary and not suitable for managing access at scale.

AWS References:

Amazon S3 Access Points:AWS Documentation - S3 Access Points

Amazon SQS FIFO queues guarantee the order of message delivery and ensure that each message is delivered exactly once. Paired with AWS Lambda, this creates a scalable, fault-tolerant architecture that processes each order in order and prevents duplicates, which is critical for ecommerce workflows.

AWS Fargate provides per-pod isolation for CPU, memory, storage, and networking, making it ideal for multi-tenant use cases.

AWS Documentation References:

EKS with Fargate

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

The company needsautomatic monitoringandnotificationsforsecurity violationsin Amazon Redshift clusters.

Option A:❌

Create an Amazon EventBridge rule that uses the Redshift clusters as the source. Create an AWS Lambda function to evaluate the Redshift cluster security configuration. Configure the Lambda function to notify the company of any violations of the security policies. Add the Lambda function as a target of the EventBridge rule.

EventBridgecan trigger actionsbased on events.

However, itdoes not track changesin Redshift security configurations.

Why not?AWS Configis bettersuited forcompliance monitoring.

Key Requirements:

Host the frontend on AWS as a static website.

Protect the application from common web vulnerabilities.

Minimal operational overhead.

Analysis of Options:

Option A:

Hosting the frontend on EC2 with an ALB introduces unnecessary complexity for serving static content.

AWS WAF rules can protect the ALB, but managing EC2 instances adds operational overhead.

Incorrect Approach:High operational complexity for a simple static website.

Option B:

Amazon CloudFront:Acts as a global CDN, reducing latency and protecting against DDoS attacks.

Multiple Origins:Allows static content to be served from S3 while routing API traffic to the on-premises backend.

AWS WAF:Integrates with CloudFront to provide web application protection.

Correct Approach:Offers low operational overhead with optimal security and performance.

Option C:

Using NLB and Network Firewall is unnecessary for a static website. This approach increases cost and complexity without addressing the frontend requirements effectively.

Incorrect Approach:Over-engineered solution.

Option D:

Hosting the frontend on S3 and using API Gateway is a viable option, but managing AWS WAF rules separately for both the S3 bucket and the REST API increases complexity.

Incorrect Approach:Less efficient than using CloudFront with multiple origins.

AWS Solution Architect References:

Amazon CloudFront Overview

AWS WAF with CloudFront

The SELECT INTO OUTFILE S3 feature allows you to export Amazon Aurora MySQL data directly to Amazon S3 with minimal operational overhead. This method is efficient and cost-effective for archiving historical data.

You can configure S3 Lifecycle rules to transition the exported data to lower-cost storage (e.g., S3 Glacier or S3 Standard-IA) and eventually delete it after 5 years.

No need for additional ETL tools like Glue or DataBrew unless complex transformations are required.

Amazon RDS Proxy helps manage thousands of concurrent database connections by pooling and reusing them efficiently. It is especially useful for serverless applications like AWS Lambda that can open numerous connections quickly, potentially overwhelming the database. Using RDS Proxy reduces connection management overhead and improves fault tolerance.

Using S3 event notifications to trigger AWS Lambda for file processing is a cost-effective and serverless solution. Lambda scales automatically with upload volume, and processing each file takes less than 5 seconds, fitting within Lambda's execution time.

Option A:AWS AppSync is designed for GraphQL APIs and is not suitable for file processing.

Option C:Kinesis is overkill and more expensive for this use case.

Option D:Running an EC2 instance incurs ongoing costs and is less flexible compared to Lambda.

AWS Documentation References:

Amazon S3 Event Notifications

AWS Lambda Overview

TheAWS_PROXY integration with Amazon API Gatewayallows the API to invoke a Lambda function synchronously, making it a suitable solution for the custom authorization mechanism and text translation use case.

Synchronous Invocation: The API Gateway REST API with AWS_PROXY integration enables synchronous processing of HTTP requests and responses, which is required for document translation.

Custom Authorization: API Gateway supports custom authorizers for fine-grained access control.

Lambda Function Execution: Although Lambda's execution time limit is 15 minutes, this is sufficient for the 6-minute document translation requirement.

Why Other Options Are Not Ideal:

Option B:

Introducing a Lambda function URL to invoke another Lambda function unnecessarily complicates the architecture.Not efficient.

Option C:

Asynchronous invocation cannot guarantee real-time response delivery for document translation tasks.Not suitable.

Option D:

Hosting the API on an EC2 instance increases operational overhead. HTTP PROXY integration does not add significant benefits here.Not cost-effective or efficient.

AWS References:

API Gateway Lambda Proxy Integration:AWS Documentation - Proxy Integration

Custom Authorization in API Gateway:AWS Documentation - Custom Authorization

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams in on-demand mode is purpose-built for real-time ingestion of streaming data and scales automatically with traffic, which is ideal for fluctuating workloads like clickstream data.

Combined with AWS Lambda, which scales concurrently based on incoming events, this setup ensures efficient, real-time processing with minimal configuration and cost overhead.

Option B involves Firehose, which is not optimal for low-latency processing. Option C is incorrect as Kinesis Video Streams is designed for video data, not clickstream. Option D introduces Flink, which adds unnecessary complexity when Lambda suffices.

To migrate a MySQL database to AWS with compatibility and scalability, Amazon Aurora is a suitable option. Aurora is compatible with MySQL and can scale automatically with Aurora Auto Scaling. AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) can be used to migrate the database from on-premises to Aurora with minimal downtime.

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. Lambda scales automatically based on the incoming requests, but it may take some time to initialize new instances of your function if there is a sudden increase in demand.This may result in high latency or cold starts for your application. To avoid this, you can use provisioned concurrency, which ensures that your function is initialized and ready to respond at any time. You can also set up a scheduled scaling policy that increases the provisioned concurrency before employees begin to use the application each day, and decreases it when the demand is

AWS Global Accelerator is a networking service that improves the performance and availability of applications for global users. It uses the AWS global network to route user traffic to the optimal endpoint based on performance and health. It also provides static IP addresses that act as a fixed entry point to the applications and support both TCP and UDP protocols1. By using AWS Global Accelerator, the solution can ensure the lowest possible latency for all users.

A. Use AWS Global Accelerator to create an accelerator. Create an Application Load Balancer (ALB) behind an accelerator endpoint that uses Global Accelerator integration and listening on the TCP and UDP ports. Update the Auto Scaling group to register instances on the ALB. This solution will not work, as ALB does not support UDP protocol2.

C. Create an Amazon CloudFront content delivery network (CDN) endpoint. Create a Network Load Balancer (NLB) behind the endpoint and listening on the TCP and UDP ports. Update the Auto Scaling group to register instances on the NLB. Update CloudFront to use the NLB as the origin. This solution will not work, as CloudFront does not support UDP protocol3.

D. Create an Amazon Cloudfront content delivery network (CDN) endpoint. Create an Application Load Balancer (ALB) behind the endpoint and listening on the TCP and UDP ports. Update the Auto Scaling group to register instances on the ALB. Update CloudFront to use the ALB as the origin. This solution will not work, as CloudFront and ALB do not support UDP protocol23.

Reference URL:

The number of instances in your Auto Scaling group can be driven by how long it takes to process a message and the acceptable amount of latency (queue delay). The solution is to use a backlog per instance metric with the target value being the acceptable backlog per instance to maintain.

The solution that will meet the requirement of ensuring that all data that is written to the EBS volumes is encrypted at rest is B. Create the EBS volumes as encrypted volumes and attach the encrypted EBS volumes to the EC2 instances. When you create an EBS volume, you can specify whether to encrypt the volume. If you choose to encrypt the volume, all data written to the volume is automatically encrypted at rest using AWS-managed keys. You can also use customer-managed keys (CMKs) stored in AWS KMS to encrypt and protect your EBS volumes. You can create encrypted EBS volumes and attach them to EC2 instances to ensure that all data written to the volumes is encrypted at rest.

Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. Lambda scales automatically based on the incoming requests, but it may take some time to initialize new instances of your function if there is a sudden increase in demand. This may result in high latency or cold starts for your API. To avoid this, you can use provisioned concurrency, which ensures that your function is initialized and ready to respond at any time. Provisioned concurrency also helps you achieve consistent low latency for your API by reducing the impact of scaling on performance.

Workload Discovery on AWS (formerly called AWS Perspective) is a tool that visualizes AWS Cloud workloads. It maintains an inventory of the AWS resources across your accounts and Regions, mapping relationships between them, and displaying them in a web UI. It also allows you to query AWS Cost and Usage Reports, search for resources, save and export architecture diagrams, and more1. By using Workload Discovery on AWS, the solution can build and map the relationship details of the various workloads across all accounts with the least operational effort.

A. Use AWS Systems Manager Inventory to generate a map view from the detailed view report. This solution will not meet the requirement of building and mapping the relationship details of the various workloads across all accounts, as AWS Systems Manager Inventory is a feature thatcollects metadata from your managed instances and stores it in a central Amazon S3 bucket. It does not provide a map view or architecture diagrams of the workloads2.

B. Use AWS Step Functions to collect workload details Build architecture diagrams of the work-loads manually. This solution will not meet the requirement of the least operational effort, as it involves creating and managing state machines to orchestrate the workload details collection, and building architecture diagrams manually.

D. Use AWS X-Ray to view the workload details Build architecture diagrams with relationships. This solution will not meet the requirement of the least operational effort, as it involves instrumenting your applications with X-Ray SDKs to collect workload details, and building architecture diagrams manually.

Reference URL:

To store and access files that are 25 GB or larger across many EC2 instances and across multiple Availability Zones, Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a suitable solution. Amazon EFS provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system that can be mounted on multiple EC2 instances concurrently. Amazon EFS supports high availability and durability by storing data across multiple Availability Zones within a Region.

Generally, for building a hierarchical relationship model, a graph database such as Amazon Neptune is a better choice. In some cases, however, DynamoDB is a better choice for hierarchical data modeling because of its flexibility, security, performance, and

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of accommodating the larger workload without adding infrastructure and minimizing the cost. Reserved DB instances are a billing discount applied to the use of certain on-demand DB instances in your account. Reserved DB instances provide you with a significant discount compared to on-demand DB instance pricing. You can buy reserved DB instances for the total workload and choose between three payment options: No Upfront, Partial Upfront, or All Upfront. You can make the Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL DB instance larger by modifying its instance type to a higher performance class. This way, you can increase the CPU, memory, and network capacity of your DB instance and handle the increased workload.

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of optimizing cost and reducing the workload on the database. Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) service that speeds up distribution of your static and dynamic web content, such as .html, .css, .js, and image files, to your users. CloudFront delivers your content through a worldwide network of data centers called edge locations. When a user requests content that you’re serving with CloudFront, the request is routed to the edge location that providesthe lowest latency (time delay), so that content is delivered with the best possible performance. You can create an Amazon CloudFront distribution to host the static web contents from an Amazon S3 bucket, which is an origin that you define for CloudFront. This way, you can offload the requests for static web content from your EC2 instances to CloudFront, which can improve the performance and availability of your website, and reduce the cost of running your EC2 instances.

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of migrating a 20 TB MySQL database within 2 weeks with minimal downtime and cost-effectively. The AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized device has up to 80 TB of usable storage space, which is enough to fit the database. The AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) can migrate data from MySQL to Amazon Aurora, Amazon RDS for MySQL, or MySQL on Amazon EC2 with minimal downtime by continuously replicating changes from the source to the target. The AWS Schema Conversion Tool (AWS SCT) can convert the source schema and code to a format compatible with the target database. By using these services together, the company can migrate the database to AWS with minimal downtime and cost. The Snowball Edge device can be shipped back to AWS to finish the migration and continue the ongoing replication until the database is fully migrated.

B. Use the Trusted Advisor recommendations from the consolidated billing account to see all RDS instance checks at the same time.

The consolidated billing account has access to all the other AWS accounts that use consolidated billing. Using the Trusted Advisor recommendations from the consolidated billing account will allow the finance team to see all RDS instance checks for all accounts at the same time.

C. Review the Trusted Advisor check for Amazon RDS Reserved Instance Optimization.

The Trusted Advisor check for Amazon RDS Reserved Instance Optimization provides recommendations for purchasing reserved instances to reduce RDS costs. By reviewing this check, the finance team can identify which RDS instances can be converted to reserved instances to save costs.

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of securely migrating the existing data to AWS and satisfying the new regulation. AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to move large amounts of data online between on-premises storage and Amazon S3. DataSync automatically encrypts data in transit and verifies data integrity during transfer. AWS CloudTrail is a service that records AWS API calls for your account and delivers log files to Amazon S3. CloudTrail can log data events, which show the resource operations performed on or within a resource in your AWS account, such as S3 object-level API activity. By using CloudTrail to log data events, you can audit access at all levels of the stored data.

it allows the compliance team to manage the KMS keys used for server-side encryption, thereby providing the necessary control over the encryption keys. Additionally, the use of the "aws:SecureTransport" condition on the bucket policy ensures that all connections to the S3 bucket are encrypted in transit.

Creating a peering connection between the VPCs allows the application's EC2 instances to communicate with the ElastiCache cluster directly and efficiently. This is the most cost-effective solution as it does not involve creating additional resources such as a Transit VPC, and it does not incur additional costs for traffic passing through the Transit VPC. Additionally, it is also more secure as it allows you to configure a more restrictive security group rule to allow inbound connection from only the application's security group.

AWS Transfer Family is a secure transfer service that enables you to transfer files into and out of AWS storage services using SFTP, FTPS, FTP, and AS2 protocols. You can use AWS Transfer Family to create an SFTP-enabled server with a public endpoint that allows only trusted IP addresses. You can also attach an Amazon S3 bucket with default encryption enabled to the SFTP service endpoint, which will provide high IOPS performance and highly configurable security for your data at rest. You can also maintain control over user permissions by granting users access to the SFTP service using IAM roles or service-managed identities. References:

A gateway VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 enables private connections between the VPC and Amazon S3 that do not require an internet gateway or NAT device. This minimizes costs and prevents traffic from traversing the internet. A gateway VPC endpoint uses a prefix list as the routetarget in a VPC route table to route traffic privately to Amazon S31.Associating the endpoint with all route tables in the VPC ensures that all subnets can access Amazon S3 through the endpoint.

Option A is incorrect because S3 Intelligent-Tiering is a storage class that optimizes storage costs by automatically moving objects between two access tiers based on changing access patterns. It does not affect the network traffic between the VPC and Amazon S32.

Option B is incorrect because S3 Transfer Acceleration is a feature that enables fast, easy, and secure transfers of files over long distances between clients and an S3 bucket. It does not prevent traffic from traversing the internet3.

Option D is incorrect because an interface VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 is powered by AWS PrivateLink, which requires an elastic network interface (ENI) with a private IP address in each subnet. This adds complexity and cost to the solution. Moreover, an interface VPC endpoint does not support cross-Region access to Amazon S3. Reference URL: 1: :

S3 Storage Lens is a cloud storage analytics feature that provides organization-wide visibility into object storage usage and activity across multiple AWS accounts in AWS Organizations. S3 Storage Lens can report the incomplete multipart upload object count as one of the metrics that it collects and displays on an interactive dashboard in the S3 console. S3 Storage Lens can also export metrics in CSV or Parquet format to an S3 bucket for further analysis. This solution will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, as it does not require any code development or policy changes.

To allow the MySQL database in the private subnets to access the internet without exposing it to the public, a NAT gateway is a suitable solution. A NAT gateway enables instances in a private subnet to connect to the internet or other AWS services, but prevents the internet from initiating a connection with those instances. A NAT gateway resides in the public subnets and can handle high throughput of traffic with low latency. A NAT gateway is also a managed service that does not require any operational overhead.

AWS Backup is a fully managed service that allows you to centralize and automate data protection of AWS services across compute, storage, and database. AWS Backup Vault Lock is an optional feature of a backup vault that can help you enhance the security and control over your backup vaults. When a lock is active in Compliance mode and the grace time is over, the vault configuration cannot be altered or deleted by a customer, account/data owner, or AWS. This ensures that your backups are available for you until they reach the expiration of their retention periods and meet the regulatory

The best solution for this situation is option B, setting up AWS Global Accelerator with UDP listeners and endpoint groups in each Region. AWS Global Accelerator is a networking service that improves the availability and performance of internet applications by routing user requests to the nearest AWS Region [1]. It also improves the performance of UDP applications by providing faster, more reliable data transfers with lower latency and fewer packet losses. By setting up UDP listeners and endpoint groups in each Region, Global Accelerator will route traffic to the nearest Region for faster response times and a better user experience.

A gateway endpoint is a gateway that is a target for a specified route in your routetable, used for traffic destined to a supported AWS service1. Amazon S3 does not support gateway endpoints, only interface endpoints2. Therefore, option A is incorrect.

An interface endpoint is an elastic network interface with a private IP address that serves as an entry point for traffic destined to a supported service1. An interface endpoint can provide secure access toAmazon S3 from within the Region, but not from the on-premises location. Therefore, option C is incorrect.

AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) is a service that allows you to create and manage encryption keys to protect your data3. AWS KMS does not provide a way to access data on Amazon S3 without traversing the internet. Therefore, option D is incorrect.

AWS Transit Gateway is a service that enables you to connect your Amazon Virtual Private Clouds (VPCs) and your on-premises networks to a single gateway. You can create a gateway in AWS Transit Gateway to access Amazon S3 securely from both the Region and the on-premises location using AWS Direct Connect. Therefore, option B is correct.

it allows the company to reduce the data output costs for accessing Amazon S3 from Amazon EC2 instances in a VPC. By provisioning a VPC gateway endpoint, the company can enable private connectivity between the VPC and S3. By configuring the route table for the private subnet to use the gateway endpoint as the route for all S3 traffic, the company can avoid using a NAT gateway, which charges for data processing and data transfer. References:

VPC Endpoints for Amazon S3

VPC Endpoints Pricing

Amazon S3 is an object storage service that offers industry-leading scalability, data availability, security, and performance. You can use Amazon S3 to host static content for your website, such as HTML files, images, videos, etc. Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) is a fully managed container orchestration service that allows you to run and scale containerized applications on AWS. AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine for containers that works with both Amazon ECS and Amazon EKS. Fargate makes it easy for you to focus on building your applications by removing the need to provision and manage servers. You can use Amazon ECS with AWS Fargate for compute power for your containerized application logic tier. Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service that makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale a relational database in the cloud. You can use a managed Amazon RDS cluster for the database tier of your application. This solution will simplify deployment and reduce operational costs for your three-tier application. References:

To resize images dynamically and serve appropriate formats to clients, a Lambda@Edge function with an external image management library can be used. Lambda@Edge allows running custom code at the edge locations of CloudFront, which can process the images on the fly and optimize them for different devices and browsers. An external image management library can provide various image manipulation and optimization features.

AWS Global Accelerator directs traffic to the optimal healthy endpoint based on health checks, it can also route traffic to the closest healthy endpoint based on geographic locationof the client. By configuring an accelerator and attaching it to a Regional endpoint in each Region, and adding the ALB as the endpoint, the solution will redirect traffic to healthy endpoints, improving the user experience by reducing latency and ensuring that the application is running optimally. This solution will ensure that traffic is directed to the closest healthy endpoint and will help to improve the overall user experience.

The AWS Health API provides programmatic access to the AWS Health information that is presented in the AWS Personal Health Dashboard. You can use the API operations to get information about AWS Health events that affect your AWS services and resources. You can also use the API to enable or disable health-based insights for your organization. You can use the AWS Health API at the start of each deployment to check on AWS infrastructure health andpause all new deployments if the API returns any

Kubernetes API requests within your cluster's VPC (such as node to control plane communication) use the private VPC

To ingest, transform, and query real-time streaming data from multiple sources, Amazon Kinesis and Amazon MSK are suitable solutions. Amazon Kinesis Data Streams can stream the data from various sources and integrate with other AWS services. Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics can transform the data using SQL or Apache Flink. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can write the data to Amazon S3 or other destinations. Amazon Athena can query the transformed data from Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon MSK can stream the data using Apache Kafka, which is a popular open-source platform for streaming data. AWS Glue can transform the data using Apache Spark or Python scripts and write the data to Amazon S3 or other destinations. Amazon Athena can also query the transformed data from Amazon S3 using standard SQL.

By placing the JSON documents in an S3 bucket, the documents will be stored in a highly durable and scalable object storage service. The use of AWS Lambda allows the company to run their Python code to process the documents as they arrive in the S3 bucket without having to worry about the underlying infrastructure. This also allows for horizontal scalability, as AWS Lambda will automatically scale the number of instances of the function based on the incoming rate of requests. The results can be stored in an Amazon Aurora DB cluster, which is a fully-managed, high-performance database service that is compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. This will provide the necessary durability and scalability for the results of the processing.

AWS Backup is a fully managed service that enables users to centralize and automate the backup of data across AWS services. It can create and manage backup plans that specify the frequency and retention period of backups. It can also assign backup resources to backup vaults, which are containers that store backup data1. By using AWS Backup, the solution can ensure that the RDS backups are consistent, restorable, and retained for a minimum period of 2 years.

B. Configure a backup window for the RDS DB instances for daily snapshots. Assign a snapshot retention policy of 2 years to each RDS DB instance. Use Amazon Data Lifecycle Manager (Amazon DLM) to schedule snapshot deletions. This solution will not meet the requirement of ensuring that the backupsare consistent and restorable, as Amazon DLM is not compatible with RDS snapshots and cannot be used to schedule snapshot deletions2.

C. Configure database transaction logs to be automatically backed up to Amazon CloudWatch Logs with an expiration period of 2 years. This solution will not meet the requirement of ensuring that the backups are consistent and restorable, as database transaction logs are not sufficient to restore a database to a point in time. They only capture the changes made to the database, not the full state of the database3.

D. Configure an AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) replication task. Deploy a replication instance, and configure a change data capture (CDC) task to stream database changes to Amazon S3 as the target. Configure S3 Lifecycle policies to delete the snapshots after 2 years. This solution will not meet the requirement of ensuring that the backups are consistent and restorable, as AWS DMS is a service that helps users migrate databases to AWS, not back up databases. It also requires additional resources and configuration, such as replication instances and CDC tasks.

Reference URL:

This answer is correct because it reflects the effect of the IAM policy on the group members. The policy has two statements: one with an Allow effect and one with a Deny effect. The Allow statement grants permission to perform any EC2 action on any resource within the us-east-1 Region. The Deny statement overrides the Allow statement and denies permission to perform the ec2:StopInstances and ec2:TerminateInstances actions on any resource within the us-east-1 Region, unless the group member is logged in with MFA. Therefore, the group members can perform any EC2 action except stopping or terminating instances in the us-east-1 Region, unless they use MFA.

 These answers are correct because they meet the requirements of converting the .csv files into images, making them available as soon as possible, and minimizing the storage costs. AWS Lambda is a service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use AWS Lambda to design a function that converts the .csv files into images and stores the images in the S3 bucket. You can invoke the Lambda function when a .csv file is uploaded to the S3 bucket by using an S3 event notification. This way, you can ensure that the images are generated and made available as soon as possible for the graphical reports. S3 Lifecycle is a feature that enables you to manage your objects so that they are stored cost effectively throughout their lifecycle. You can create S3 Lifecycle rules for .csv files and image files in the S3 bucket to transition them to different storage classes or expire them based on your business needs. You can transition the .csv files from S3 Standard to S3 Glacier 1 day after they areuploaded, since they are only needed twice a year for ML trainings and audits that are planned weeks in advance. S3 Glacier is a storage class for data archiving that offers secure, durable, and extremely low-cost storage with retrieval times ranging from minutes to hours. You can expire the image files after 30 days, since they become irrelevant after 1 month.

B and E are the correct answers because they allow the solutions architect to ensure that API calls to Amazon DynamoDB from Amazon EC2 instances in a VPC do not travel across the internet. By creating a gateway endpoint for DynamoDB, the solutions architect can enable private connectivity between the VPC and DynamoDB. By creating a security group entry in the endpoint’s security group to provide access, the solutions architect can control which EC2 instances can communicate with DynamoDB through the endpoint. References:

Gateway Endpoints

Controlling Access to Services with VPC Endpoints

AWS Transit Gateway is a highly scalable and centralized hub for connecting multiple VPCs, on-premises networks, and remote networks. It simplifies network connectivity by providing a single entry point and reducing the number of connections required. In this scenario, deploying an AWS Transit Gateway in the networking team's AWS account allows for efficient management and control over the network connectivity across multiple VPCs.

To ingest and process high-volume streaming data with the least operational overhead, Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a suitable solution. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can capture, transform, anddeliver streaming data to Amazon S3 or other destinations. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can scale automatically to match the throughput of the data and handle any amount of data. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is also a fully managed service that does not require any servers to provision or manage.

it allows the company to simplify the on-premises backup infrastructure and reduce costs by eliminating the use of physical backup tapes. By setting up AWS Storage Gateway to connect with the backup applications using the iSCSI-virtual tape library (VTL) interface, the company can store backup data on virtual tapes in S3 or Glacier. This preserves the existing investment in the on-premises backup applications and workflows while leveraging AWS storage services. References:

AWS Storage Gateway

Tape Gateway

AWSCost Anomaly Detection allows you to create monitors that track the cost and usage of your AWS resources and alert you when there is an unusual spending pattern. You can create monitors based on different dimensions, such as AWS services, accounts, tags, or cost categories. You can also create alert subscriptions that notify you by email or Amazon SNS when an anomaly is detected. You can specify the threshold and frequency of the alerts, and choose to receive weekly summaries of your anomalies.

Reference URLs:

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to centrally collect security data with minimal development effort to assess and improve security across all workloads.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Security Lake: This is a purpose-built service for centralizing security data from across AWS services and third-party sources into a data lake. It provides native integration and requires minimal development effort to set up.

AWS Lake Formation with AWS Glue: While this can be used to create a data lake, it requires more development effort to set up and configure Glue crawlers for ingestion.

AWS Lambda with S3: This approach involves custom development to collect and process security data before storing it in S3, which requires more effort.

AWS DMS to RDS: AWS Database Migration Service is typically used for database migrations and is not suited for collecting and analyzing security data.

Best Option for Minimal Development Effort:

Amazon Security Lake provides the least development effort for setting up a centralized repository for security data. It simplifies data ingestion and management, making it the most efficient solution for this use case.

Requirement Analysis: The application needs near real-time access to data, persistence, and minimal operational overhead.

ElastiCache for Redis: Provides in-memory data storage with persistence, supporting fast access and durability.

Operational Overhead: Managed service reduces the burden of setup, maintenance, and scaling.

Implementation:

Deploy an ElastiCache for Redis cluster.

Configure Redis to persist data to disk using AOF (Append-Only File) or RDB (Redis Database Backup) snapshots.

Conclusion: ElastiCache for Redis meets the requirements for fast access, data persistence, and low operational overhead.

References

Amazon ElastiCache:ElastiCache for Redis Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to improve caching to enhance website performance while ensuring that stale content is not served for more than a few minutes after a deployment.

Analysis of Options:

Set CloudFront TTL: Setting a short TTL (e.g., 2 minutes) ensures that cached content is refreshed frequently, reducing the risk of serving stale content.

S3 Bucket TTL: This would not control the cache duration for the CloudFront distribution.

Cache-Control Private: This directive is for controlling caching by private caches (e.g., browsers) and is not applicable for CloudFront.

Lambda@Edge: While this can add headers dynamically, it adds complexity and operational overhead.

Cache-Control max-age and CloudFront Invalidation: Setting a longer max-age for objects ensures they are cached longer, reducing load on the origin. Invalidation ensures that updated content is refreshed immediately after deployment.

Best Combination of Caching Methods:

Set the CloudFront default TTL to 2 minutes: This balances caching and freshness of content.

Add a Cache-Control max-age directive of 24 hours and use CloudFront invalidation: This ensures efficient caching while providing a mechanism to clear outdated content immediately after a deployment.

Understanding the Requirement: The application running on EC2 instances in private subnets needs frequent access to large confidential files stored in S3, minimizing data transfer costs.

Analysis of Options:

Gateway Endpoint for S3: Provides a secure, scalable, and cost-effective way for instances in private subnets to access S3 without using the internet or NAT gateways, thus minimizing data transfer costs.

Single NAT Gateway: Incurs additional costs for data transfer through the NAT gateway, which is not cost-effective.

PrivateLink Interface Endpoint for S3: Primarily used for accessing AWS services over a private connection but is more complex and costly compared to a gateway endpoint for S3.

Multiple NAT Gateways: Increases costs significantly and adds complexity without offering the cost benefits of a gateway endpoint.

Best Solution:

Gateway Endpoint for S3: This solution provides the required access with the least data transfer costs and minimal complexity.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to collect transaction data in real time, avoid data duplication, and perform additional processing without managing infrastructure.

Analysis of Options:

SQS FIFO Queue with Lambda: Ensures data is processed in order and prevents duplication.Lambda handles processing without the need to manage servers.

SQS FIFO Queue with AWS Batch: While this ensures no duplicates, it introduces additional complexity and management overhead with AWS Batch.

Kinesis Data Streams with AWS Batch and EC2: Involves more components and infrastructure management, which is against the requirement of not wanting to manage infrastructure.

Step Functions with Lambda and EC2: Involves setting up multiple services and still requires managing EC2 instances, increasing complexity.

Best Solution:

SQS FIFO Queue with Lambda: This combination ensures real-time data processing, prevents duplication, and minimizes infrastructure management, meeting all requirements efficiently.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to store a copy of all new photos in the us-east-1 Region from an S3 bucket in the us-west-1 Region.

Analysis of Options:

Cross-Region Replication: Automatically replicates objects across regions with minimal operational effort once configured.

CORS Configuration: Used for allowing resources on a web page to be requested from another domain, not for replication.

S3 Lifecycle Rule: Manages the transition of objects between storage classes within the same bucket, not for cross-region replication.

S3 Event Notifications with Lambda: Requires additional configuration and management compared to Cross-Region Replication.

Best Solution:

S3 Cross-Region Replication: This solution provides an automated and efficient way to replicate objects to another region, meeting the requirement with the least operational effort.

Understanding the Requirement: Developers in the Development account need to push code changes to the Production account, with phased access control for different stages of the project.

Analysis of Options:

Policy Documents in Each Account: This approach increases complexity and is harder to manage compared to role-based access.

IAM Role in Development Account: Roles in the Development account cannot directly control access to resources in the Production account.

IAM Role in Production Account: Creating a role in the Production account with a trust policy that allows the Development account to assume it provides controlled, secure access.

IAM Group in Production Account: This approach does not provide the required cross-account access control.

Best Solution:

IAM Role in the Production Account: This method allows precise control over who can access the Production account from the Development account, with the ability to manage permissions and access levels effectively.

Understanding the Requirement: The data must be encrypted at rest with automatic key rotation every year, with minimal operational overhead.

Analysis of Options:

SSE-S3: This option provides encryption with S3 managed keys and automatic key rotation but offers less control and flexibility compared to KMS keys.

AWS KMS with Customer Managed Key (automatic rotation): This option offers full control over encryption keys, with AWS KMS handling automatic key rotation, minimizing operational overhead.

AWS KMS with Customer Managed Key (manual rotation): This requires manual intervention for key rotation, increasing operational overhead.

Customer Key Material: This involves more complex management, including importing key material and setting up automatic rotation, which increases operational overhead.

Best Option for Minimal Operational Overhead:

AWS KMS with a customer managed key and automatic rotation provides the needed security and key rotation with minimal operational effort. Setting the S3 bucket’s default encryption to use this key ensures all data is encrypted as required.

Understanding the Requirement: The order processing system requires multiple independent validation steps, each handled by separate Lambda functions, with each function accessing only the subset of order information it needs. The system should be loosely coupled to accommodate future changes.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon SQS with a new Lambda function for transformation: This involves additional complexity in creating and managing multiple SQS queues and an extra Lambda function for data transformation.

Amazon SNS with message filtering: While SNS supports message filtering, it is more suited for pub/sub messaging patterns rather than event-driven processing requiring fine-grained control over the data sent to each function.

Amazon EventBridge with input transformers: EventBridge is designed for event-driven architectures, allowing for fine-grained control with input transformers that can modify and filter the event data sent to each target Lambda function, ensuring each function receives only the necessary information.

SQS with synchronous Lambda invocations: This approach adds unnecessary complexity with synchronous invocations and is not ideal for an event-driven, loosely coupled architecture.

Best Solution:

Amazon EventBridge with input transformers: This option provides the most flexible, scalable, and loosely coupled architecture, enabling each Lambda function to receive only the required subset of data.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to optimize costs and reduce operational overhead for an RDS for PostgreSQL database that only needs to be active during business hours on weekdays.

Analysis of Options:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: Allows for automated start and stop schedules based on specified times, ideal for resources only needed during certain hours. This directly optimizes costs by running the database only when needed.

Turn off automatic backups and create weekly snapshots: Does not address the requirement of reducing operational overhead and optimizing runtime costs.

Custom Lambda function: This could work but adds unnecessary complexity compared to using the Instance Scheduler.

All Upfront Reserved DB Instances: While this reduces costs, it does not optimize for usage patterns that require the database only during specific hours.

Best Solution:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: This option effectively manages the database runtime based on the specified schedule, reducing costs and operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The company anticipates a spike in traffic during a holiday and wants to ensure the Auto Scaling group can handle the increased load without impacting performance.

Analysis of Options:

CloudWatch Alarm: This reacts to spikes based on metrics like CPU utilization but does not proactively scale before the anticipated demand.

Recurring Scheduled Action: This allows the Auto Scaling group to scale up based on a known schedule, ensuring additional capacity is available before the expected spike.

Increase Min/Max Instances: This could result in unnecessary costs by maintaining higher capacity even when not needed.

SNS Notification: Alerts on scaling events but does not proactively manage scaling to prevent performance issues.

Best Solution for Proactive Scaling:

Create a recurring scheduled action: This approach ensures that the Auto Scaling group scales up before the peak demand, providing the necessary capacity proactively without manual intervention.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to automatically detect and respond to suspicious or unexpected behavior in its AWS environment, beyond the existing AWS WAF setup.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon GuardDuty: Provides continuous monitoring and threat detection across AWS accounts and resources, including integration with AWS WAF for automated response.

AWS Firewall Manager: Manages firewall rules across multiple accounts but is more focused on central management than threat detection.

Amazon Inspector: Focuses on security assessments and vulnerability management rather than real-time threat detection.

Amazon Macie: Primarily used for data security and privacy, not comprehensive threat detection.

Best Solution:

Amazon GuardDuty with EventBridge and Lambda: This combination ensures continuous threat detection and automated response by updating AWS WAF rules based on GuardDuty findings.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to enable communication between VPCs across multiple AWS Regions with minimal administrative effort.

Analysis of Options:

VPC Peering: Managing multiple VPC peering connections across regions is complex and difficult to scale, leading to significant administrative overhead.

AWS Direct Connect Gateways: Primarily used for creating private connections between AWS and on-premises environments, not for inter-VPC communication across regions.

AWS Transit Gateway: Simplifies VPC interconnections within a region and supports Transit Gateway peering for cross-region connectivity, reducing administrative complexity.

AWS PrivateLink: Used for accessing AWS services and third-party services over a private connection, not for inter-VPC communication.

Best Solution:

AWS Transit Gateway with Transit Gateway Peering: This option provides a scalable and efficient solution for managing VPC communications both within a single region and across multiple regions with minimal administrative overhead.

A service control policy (SCP) is a type of policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization, allowing you to ensure your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines. SCPs are available only in an organization that has all features enabled. SCPs do not grant permissions; instead, they specify the maximum permissions for an organization or organizational unit (OU). SCPs limit permissions that identity-basedpolicies or resource-based policies grant to entities (users or roles) within the account, but do not grant permissions to entities. You can use SCPs to restrict the actions that the root user in an account can perform. You can also use SCPs to prevent users or roles in any account from creating or modifying certain AWS resources, such as EC2 instances with public IP addresses or IAM resources with inline policies or “". For example, you can create an SCP that denies the ec2:RunInstances action if the request includes the AssociatePublicIpAddress parameter set to true. You can also create an SCP that denies the iam:PutUserPolicy and iam:PutRolePolicy actions if the request includes a policy document that contains "”. By attaching these SCPs to your organization or OUs, you can prevent the deployment of AWS CloudFormation stacks that violate these rules.

AWS Control Tower proactive controls are guardrails that enforce preventive policies on your accounts and resources. Proactive guardrails are implemented as AWS Organizations service control policies (SCPs) and AWS Config rules. However, AWS Control Tower does not provide a built-in proactive guardrail to block EC2 instances with public IP addresses or IAM resources with inline policies or “*”. You would have to create your own custom guardrails using AWS CloudFormation templates and SCPs, which is essentially the same as option D. Therefore, option A is not correct.

AWS Control Tower detective controls are guardrails that detect and alert on policy violations in your accounts and resources. Detective guardrails are implemented as AWS Config rules and Amazon CloudWatch alarms. Detective guardrails do not block or remediate noncompliant resources; they only notify you of the issues. Therefore, option B is not correct.

AWS Config is a service that enables you to assess, audit, and evaluate the configurations of your AWS resources. AWS Config continuously monitors and records your AWS resource configurations and allows you to automate the evaluation of recorded configurations against desired configurations. AWS Config rules are customizable, AWS Lambda functions that AWS Config invokes to evaluate your AWS resource configurations. You can use AWS Config rules to check for compliance with your policies, such as ensuring that EC2 instances have public IP addresses disabled or IAM resources do not have inline policies or “*”. However, AWS Config rules alone cannot prevent the deployment of AWS CloudFormation stacks that violate these policies; they can only report the compliance status. You would need to use another service, such as AWS Systems Manager Session Manager, to run automation scripts to delete or modify the noncompliant resources. This would require additional configuration and permissions, and may not be the most efficient or secure way to enforce your policies. Therefore, option C is not correct.

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it enables the company to migrate its on-premises NFS data store to AWS without changing the existing applications or workflows. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides seamless and secure integration between on-premises and AWS storage. Amazon S3 File Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a file interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. By setting up an Amazon S3 File Gateway, the company can store and retrieve files as objects in Amazon S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS. The company can also use an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to automatically transition the data to the appropriate storage class based on the frequency of access and the cost of storage. For example, the company can use S3 Standard for frequently accessed data, S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) or S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) for less frequently accessed data, and S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term archival data.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a block interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. Volume Gateway is not suitable for migrating an NFS data store, as it requires attaching the volumes to EC2 instances or on-premises servers using the iSCSI protocol. Option C is not a valid solution because Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a fully managed elastic NFS file system that is designed for workloads that require high availability, scalability, and performance. Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files, with a lower price per GB and a higher price per access. Using Amazon EFS Standard-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. Option D is not a valid solution because Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that isoptimized for infrequently accessed files that do not require the availability and durability of Amazon EFS Standard or Standard-IA. Amazon EFS One Zone-IA stores data in a single Availability Zone, which reduces the cost by 47% compared to Amazon EFS Standard-IA, but also increases the risk of data loss in the event of an Availability Zone failure. Using Amazon EFS One Zone-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. It would also compromise the availability and durability of the data.

Requirement Analysis: The application must process each credit card data validation request at least once, securely and cost-effectively.

SQS FIFO Queues: Ensures that each message is processed exactly once and in the exact order sent.

AWS Lambda: Using Lambda for event-driven processing ensures scalability and cost-efficiency.

SSE-SQS: Provides encryption at rest using SQS-managed keys, simplifying encryption management.

Implementation:

Set up SQS FIFO queues as the event source for Lambda.

Enable SSE-SQS for encryption.

Ensure the Lambda execution role has the necessary permissions to use the encryption keys.

Conclusion: This combination meets the requirements of security, exact-once processing, and cost-effectiveness.

References

Amazon SQS:Amazon SQS Documentation

AWS Lambda with SQS:Using AWS Lambda with Amazon SQS

Current Backup Settings: By default, Amazon RDS creates automated backups with a retention period of 7 days.

Regulatory Requirements: The requirement is to retain daily backups for 30 days.

Adjusting Retention Period: You can modify the RDS instance settings to increase the automated backup retention period to 30 days.

Operational Overhead: This solution is the simplest as it leverages existing automated backups and requires minimal intervention.

Implementation: The change can be made via the AWS Management Console, AWS CLI, or AWS SDKs.

References

Amazon RDS Backups:Amazon RDS Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company has petabytes of data in S3 Standard across multiple buckets with varying access frequencies. They do not know the access patterns and need a cost-optimized storage solution with minimal operational effort.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Intelligent-Tiering: This storage class automatically moves data between two access tiers (frequent and infrequent) based on changing access patterns. It incurs a small monitoring and automation charge but eliminates the need to manually move data between storage classes.

S3 Storage Class Analysis Tool: While useful for determining access patterns, this tool requires manual intervention to move objects to the appropriate storage class, which increases operational overhead.

S3 Glacier Instant Retrieval: This storage class is designed for data that is rarely accessed but requires instant retrieval when needed. It may not be suitable for data with unknown and varying access patterns.

S3 One Zone-IA: This is a lower-cost option for infrequently accessed data stored in a single availability zone. It does not provide the same level of durability and availability as other options and requires knowledge of access patterns.

Best Option for Operational Efficiency:

S3 Intelligent-Tiering provides the best balance of cost savings and operational efficiency. It dynamically adjusts to access patterns without manual intervention, ensuring the company is only paying for what they need without the risk of incurring high costs for infrequent access data.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a container solution that can scale across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, with a load balancer for HTTP traffic.

Analysis of Options:

Fargate Launch Type and ECS Anywhere: Using Fargate for cloud-based containers and ECS Anywhere for on-premises containers provides a unified management experience across environments without needing to manage infrastructure.

Application Load Balancer: Suitable for HTTP traffic and can distribute requests to the ECS services, ensuring scalability and performance.

Network Load Balancer: Typically used for TCP/UDP traffic, not specifically optimized for HTTP traffic.

EC2 Launch Type for ECS and ECS Anywhere with Fargate: Involves managing infrastructure for EC2 instances, increasing operational overhead.

Best Combination of Solutions:

ECS with Fargate Launch Type and ECS Anywhere: This provides flexibility and scalability across hybrid environments with minimal operational overhead.

Application Load Balancer: Optimized for HTTP traffic, ensuring efficient load distribution and scaling for the ECS services.

Understanding the Requirement: The university wants to centralize management and automate backups for its AWS services (EC2, RDS, and DynamoDB), reducing reliance on custom scripts.

Analysis of Options:

Third-party backup software with AWS Storage Gateway: This solution introduces external dependencies and adds complexity compared to using native AWS services.

AWS Backup: Provides a centralized, fully managed service to automate and manage backups across various AWS services, including EC2, RDS, and DynamoDB.

AWS Config: Primarily used for compliance and configuration monitoring, not for backup management.

AWS Systems Manager State Manager: Useful for configuration management but not specifically designed for managing backups.

Best Solution:

AWS Backup: This service offers the necessary functionality to centralize and automate backups, providing a streamlined and integrated solution with minimal effort.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to migrate sensitive and critical data from on-premises SQL Server databases to AWS, aiming to increase security and reduce operational overhead.

Analysis of Options:

EC2 Instances with KMS: Running SQL Server on EC2 provides control but requires significant operational overhead for management, backups, patching, and high availability.

Multi-AZ Amazon RDS for SQL Server with KMS: Amazon RDS for SQL Server offers managed database services, reducing operational overhead. Multi-AZ deployment provides high availability, and KMS encryption ensures data security.

Amazon S3 and Macie: S3 is not a suitable replacement for relational databases, and Macie is used for data security and compliance but not for database operations.

Amazon DynamoDB and CloudWatch Logs: DynamoDB is a NoSQL database and does not support SQL Server workloads directly. CloudWatch Logs are used for monitoring, not for ensuring database security.

Best Solution:

Multi-AZ Amazon RDS for SQL Server with KMS: This solution meets the requirements for security, high availability, and reduced operational overhead by using a managed database service with encryption.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to cost-optimize their workload that uses EC2, Lambda, Fargate, and SageMaker, covering the most services with the fewest savings plans.

Analysis of Options:

EC2 Instance Savings Plan: Limited to EC2 and SageMaker, missing coverage for Lambda and Fargate.

Compute Savings Plan: Provides the most flexibility, covering a broad range of compute services, including EC2, Lambda, Fargate, and SageMaker.

SageMaker Savings Plan: Specifically for SageMaker, missing coverage for EC2, Lambda, and Fargate.

Combination of plans: The Compute Savings Plan is versatile and can be combined to cover different services efficiently.

Best Solution:

Compute Savings Plan for EC2, Lambda, and SageMaker: Covers the primary compute services efficiently.

Compute Savings Plan for Lambda, Fargate, and EC2: Covers the remaining services, ensuring broad coverage with minimal plans.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to maximize cost savings for their application over the next three years, with the flexibility to change the instance family and sizes within the next six months based on application popularity and usage.

Analysis of Options:

Compute Savings Plan: This plan offers the most flexibility, allowing the company to change instance families, sizes, and regions. It applies to EC2, AWS Fargate, and AWS Lambda, offering significant cost savings with this flexibility.

EC2 Instance Savings Plan: This plan is less flexible than the Compute Savings Plan, as it only applies to EC2 instances and allows changes within a specific instance family.

Zonal Reserved Instances: These provide a discount on EC2 instances but are tied to a specific availability zone and instance type, offering the least flexibility.

Standard Reserved Instances: These offer discounts on EC2 instances but with more restrictions compared to Savings Plans, particularly when changing instance types and families.

Best Option for Flexibility and Savings:

The Compute Savings Plan is the most cost-effective solution because it allows the company to maintain flexibility while still achieving significant cost savings. This is critical for adapting to changing application demands without being locked into specific instance types or families.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs highly available, scalable storage for a document management application without modifying the application during migration.

EFS Overview: Amazon EFS provides scalable file storage that can be mounted concurrently on multiple EC2 instances across different Availability Zones.

EFS Standard-IA: Using the Standard-IA storage class helps reduce costs for infrequently accessed data while maintaining high availability and scalability.

Implementation:

Create an EFS file system.

Configure mount targets in multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability.

Mount the EFS file system on EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group.

Conclusion: This solution meets the high availability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness requirements without needing application modifications.

References

Amazon EFS:Amazon EFS Documentation

EFS Storage Classes:Amazon EFS Storage Classes

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to migrate applications to AWS, maintaining isolated networks while allowing communication with a shared services VPC and among the applications.

Analysis of Options:

Software VPN Tunnels: This approach involves high administrative overhead and complexity in managing multiple VPN connections.

VPC Peering: While suitable for smaller numbers of VPCs, it becomes complex and hard to manage at scale with over 100 applications.

Direct Connect: Primarily used for high-bandwidth, low-latency connections to on-premises networks, not inter-VPC communication.

Transit Gateway: Simplifies network management by acting as a central hub, allowing easy routing and scalability as more applications are migrated.

Best Solution:

Transit Gateway: This provides a scalable, efficient solution with minimal administrative overhead for managing network connections between multiple VPCs and the shared services VPC.

Understanding the Requirement: The mobile app captures and uploads raw video clips to S3, but users experience buffering and playback issues due to the large size of these videos.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon CloudFront: A content delivery network (CDN) that can cache and deliver content globally with low latency. It helps reduce buffering by delivering content from edge locations closer to the users.

AWS DataSync: Primarily used for data transfer and replication across AWS Regions, which does not directly address the video size and buffering issue.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder: A media transcoding service that can convert raw video files into formats and resolutions more suitable for streaming, reducing the size and improving playback performance.

EC2 Instances in Local Zones: While this could provide content delivery and caching, it involves more operational overhead compared to using CloudFront.

EC2 Instances for Transcoding: Involves setting up and maintaining infrastructure, leading to higher operational overhead compared to using Elastic Transcoder.

Best Combination of Solutions:

Deploy Amazon CloudFront: This optimizes the performance by caching content at edge locations, reducing latency and buffering for users.

Use Amazon Elastic Transcoder: This reduces the file size and converts videos into formats better suited for streaming on mobile devices.

Requirement Analysis: The company wants to identify cost optimizations for EC2 instances, the Auto Scaling group, and EBS volumes with high operational efficiency.

AWS Compute Optimizer: This service provides actionable recommendations to help optimize your AWS resources, including EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Cost Recommendations: Compute Optimizer analyzes the utilization of resources and provides specific recommendations for rightsizing or optimizing the configurations.

Operational Efficiency: Using Compute Optimizer automates the process of identifying cost-saving opportunities, reducing the need for manual analysis.

Implementation:

Enable AWS Compute Optimizer for your AWS account.

Review the recommendations provided for EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Conclusion: This solution provides a comprehensive, automated approach to identifying cost optimizations with minimal operational effort.

References

AWS Compute Optimizer:AWS Compute Optimizer Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to design a scalable and serverless solution for a near-real-time streaming application that experiences high latency due to large amounts of incoming data. The job processing takes about 30 minutes.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose: Provides a fully managed service for real-time data streaming and ingestion, allowing for seamless data delivery to destinations such as Amazon S3, Redshift, and Elasticsearch.

AWS Lambda with AWS Step Functions: While suitable for orchestration and lightweight processing, Lambda might not handle long-running jobs (max 15 minutes execution limit) efficiently.

AWS DMS: Primarily used for database migration, not for real-time data ingestion in this context.

Amazon EC2 in Auto Scaling Group: Provides scalability but involves managing servers, which is not serverless and adds operational overhead.

AWS Fargate with ECS: Offers a serverless compute engine for containers, allowing easy scaling and management without managing the underlying infrastructure.

Best Solution:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose: For ingesting the streaming data efficiently.

AWS Fargate with ECS: For processing the data in a scalable and serverless manner.

Understanding the Requirement: The robotics company needs a public load balancer to ensure seamless communication with backend services, route traffic based on query strings, and encrypt traffic.

Analysis of Options:

Network Load Balancer with ACM Certificate: NLBs primarily operate at the transport layer (Layer 4) and do not natively support query parameter-based routing, which is a Layer 7 feature.

Gateway Load Balancer with IAM Certificate: Gateway Load Balancers are designed for deploying, scaling, and managing third-party virtual appliances and do not support HTTP path-based or query parameter-based routing.

Application Load Balancer with ACM Certificate: ALBs operate at the application layer (Layer 7), supporting features like query parameter-based routing and SSL/TLS termination with ACM certificates.

Network Load Balancer with IAM Certificate: As with the first option, NLBs do not support query parameter-based routing, making it unsuitable for this requirement.

Best Solution:

Application Load Balancer with ACM Certificate: This option provides the necessary Layer 7 routing capabilities and SSL/TLS termination to meet the requirements for query parameter-based routing and encrypted communication.

Understanding the Requirement: The application is stateful and requires at least two EC2 instances to be running at all times, with a highly available and fault-tolerant architecture.

Analysis of Options:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: Ensures high availability by distributing instances across multiple AZs, fulfilling the requirement of always having two instances running.

Minimum capacity of four: Provides redundancy but is more than what is required and increases cost without additional benefit.

Spot Instances: Not suitable for a stateful application requiring guaranteed availability, as Spot Instances can be terminated at any time.

Combination of On-Demand and Spot Instances: Mixing instance types might provide cost savings but does not ensure the required availability for a stateful application.

Best Solution:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: This setup ensures high availability and meets the requirement with the least cost and complexity.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs to scale throughput for uploading large files to S3 and downloading them to EC2 instances.

S3 Multipart Uploads: This method allows for the parallel upload of parts of a file, improving upload efficiency and reliability.

Parallel Fetching: Fetching multiple byte-ranges in parallel from S3 improves download performance.

Implementation:

For uploads, use the S3 multipart upload API to upload files in parallel.

For downloads, use the S3 API to request multiple byte-ranges concurrently.

Conclusion: These solutions effectively scale throughput and improve the performance of both uploads and downloads.

References

S3 Multipart Upload:Amazon S3 Multipart Upload

Parallel Fetching:S3 Byte-Range Fetches

Requirement Analysis: The application involves batch processing of large data transfers between EC2 instances.

Data Transfer Costs: Data transfer within the same Availability Zone (AZ) is typically free, while cross-AZ transfers incur additional costs.

Implementation:

Launch all EC2 instances within the same Availability Zone.

Ensure the instances are part of the same subnet to facilitate seamless data transfer.

Conclusion: Placing all EC2 instances in the same AZ reduces data transfer costs significantly without affecting the application’s functionality.

References

AWS Pricing:AWS Data Transfer Pricing

AWS Outposts is a fully managed service that delivers AWS infrastructure and services to virtually any on-premises or edge location for a consistent hybrid experience. AWS Outposts supports Amazon EKS, which is a managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS and on-premises. By installing an AWS Outposts rack in the company’s data center, the company can run containers in a Kubernetes environment using Amazon EKS and other AWS managed services, while keeping the data locally in the company’s data center and meeting the compliance requirements. AWS Outposts also provides a seamless connection to the local AWS Region for access to a broad range of AWS services.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Local Zones are not deployed in the company’s data center, but in large metropolitan areas closer to end users. AWS Local Zones are owned, managed, and operated by AWS, and they provide low-latency access to the public internet and the local AWS Region. Option B is not a valid solution because AWS Snowmobile is a service that transports exabytes of data to AWS using a 45-foot long ruggedized shipping container pulled by a semi-trailer truck. AWS Snowmobile is not designed for running containers or AWS managed services on-premises, but for large-scale data migration. Option D is not a valid solution because AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized is a device that provides 80 TB of HDD or 210 TB of NVMe storage capacity for data transfer and edge computing. AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized does not support Amazon EKS or other AWS managed services, and it is not suitable for running containers in a Kubernetes environment.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a disaster recovery solution for FSx for NetApp ONTAP in a secondary region, accessible using the same protocols (CIFS and NFS).

Analysis of Options:

Lambda Function and S3: Involves copying data to S3, which changes the access protocols and increases operational overhead.

AWS Backup: Suitable for backup and restore but not for real-time or near-real-time replication for disaster recovery.

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: SnapMirror provides efficient replication between ONTAP instances, maintaining access protocols and requiring minimal operational overhead.

Amazon EFS: Does not support CIFS and requires migrating data, increasing complexity and changing access protocols.

Best Solution:

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: This solution ensures seamless disaster recovery with the same access protocols and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: EC2 instances need to upload data to S3 without using the public internet, and on-premises servers need to consume this data.

Analysis of Options:

Interface VPC Endpoint for EC2: Not relevant for accessing S3.

Gateway VPC Endpoint for S3 and Direct Connect: Provides private connectivity from EC2 instances to S3 and from on-premises to AWS, ensuring compliance with the requirement to avoid public internet.

Transit Gateway and Site-to-Site VPN: Adds unnecessary complexity and does not provide the same level of performance as Direct Connect.

Proxy EC2 Instances with NAT Gateways: Increases complexity and costs compared to a direct connection using VPC endpoints and Direct Connect.

Best Solution:

Gateway VPC Endpoint for S3 and Direct Connect: This solution ensures secure, private data transfer both within AWS and between on-premises and AWS, meeting the compliance requirements effectively.

Requirement Analysis: Need quick, cost-effective, and consistent access to on-premises network services from multiple AWS accounts.

AWS Transit Gateway: Centralizes and simplifies network management by connecting VPCs and on-premises networks.

Direct Connect Integration: Assigning DX to the transit gateway ensures consistent and high-performance connectivity.

Operational Overhead: Minimal because Transit Gateway simplifies routing and management.

Implementation:

Set up AWS Transit Gateway.

Connect new AWS accounts to the Transit Gateway.

Route traffic through Transit Gateway to on-premises servers via Direct Connect.

Conclusion: This solution provides a scalable, cost-effective, and low-overhead method to meet connectivity requirements.

References

AWS Transit Gateway:AWS Transit Gateway Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to redesign the architecture to be highly available and use AWS managed solutions for hosting a web application with static content, PHP application, and Redis for user sessions.

Analysis of Options:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk: Suitable for simplifying deployment but may not provide the desired flexibility and control for complex architectures.

AWS Lambda and API Gateway: Not ideal for hosting a stateful PHP application and handling static content.Adding complexity without significant benefit.

EC2 instance with ElastiCache and S3: Provides some high availability but involves managing EC2 instances, which increases operational overhead.

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This solution leverages fully managed AWS services for each component, ensuring high availability and scalability.

Best Solution:

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This combination of services meets the requirements for a highly available and managed solution, ensuring optimal performance and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: Senior leadership wants a custom dashboard displaying NAT gateway costs daily, starting from the beginning of the current month.

Analysis of Options:

QuickSight with DataSync: While QuickSight is suitable for dashboards, DataSync is not designed for querying and analyzing data reports.

QuickSight with Athena: QuickSight can visualize data queried by Athena, which is designed to analyze data directly from S3.

CloudWatch with DataSync: CloudWatch is primarily for monitoring metrics, not for creating detailed cost analysis dashboards.

CloudWatch with Athena: Similarly, using CloudWatch with Athena does not align well with the requirement for a visual dashboard.

Best Solution for Visualization and Querying:

Amazon QuickSight with Athena: This combination allows for powerful data visualization and querying capabilities. QuickSight can create dynamic dashboards, while Athena efficiently queries the cost and usage report data stored in S3.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to keep daily EBS snapshots for 1 month and retain monthly snapshots for 7 years due to new regulations.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Glacier Deep Archive: Moving snapshots to S3 Glacier Deep Archive involves additional complexity and might not be the most straightforward approach for EBS snapshots.

EBS Snapshots Archive: This is a cost-effective solution designed specifically for long-term storage of EBS snapshots.

Standard Tier for 7 Years: Keeping snapshots in the standard tier for 7 years is more expensive and does not optimize costs.

EBS Direct APIs to S3: This involves additional operational overhead and is not the most cost-effective approach compared to using EBS Snapshots Archive.

Best Solution:

EBS Snapshots Archive: Adding a policy to move monthly snapshots to the EBS Snapshots Archive for long-term retention is the most cost-effective and administratively simple solution.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to control the creation, rotation, and disabling of encryption keys for data stored in S3 with minimal effort.

Analysis of Options:

SSE-S3: Provides server-side encryption using S3 managed keys but does not offer full control over key management.

Customer managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): Allows the company to fully control key creation, rotation, and disabling, providing a high level of security and compliance.

AWS managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): While it provides some control, it does not offer the same level of granularity as customer-managed keys.

EC2 instance encryption and re-upload: This approach is operationally intensive and does not leverage AWS managed services for efficient key management.

Best Solution:

Customer managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): This solution meets the requirement for full control over encryption keys with minimal operational overhead, leveraging AWS managed services for secure key management.

Understanding the Requirements: The company needs to optimize costs and has the flexibility to change EC2 instance types and families frequently (every 2-3 months).

Savings Plans Overview: Savings Plans offer significant savings over On-Demand pricing, with the flexibility to use any instance type and family within a region.

No Upfront Compute Savings Plan: This plan allows for cost optimization without any upfront payment, offering flexibility to change instance types and families.

Term Selection: A 1-year term is appropriate for balancing cost savings and flexibility given the frequent changes in instance types.

Conclusion: A No Upfront Compute Savings Plan for a 1-year term provides the needed flexibility and cost savings without the commitment and inflexibility of Reserved Instances.

References

AWS Savings Plans:AWS Savings Plans

AWS Cost Management Documentation:AWS Cost Management

These two solutions will optimize the HPC environment for networking and storage. Amazon FSx for Lustre is a fully managed service that provides cost-effective, high-performance, scalable storage for compute workloads. It is built on the world’s most popular high-performance file system, Lustre, which is designed for applications that require fast storage, such as HPC and machine learning. By configuring the file system with scratch storage, you can achieve sub-millisecond latencies, up to hundreds of GBs/s of throughput, and millions of IOPS. Scratch file systems are ideal for temporary storage and shorter-term processing of data. Data is not replicated and does not persist if a file server fails. For more information, see Amazon FSx for Lustre.

Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA) is a network interface for Amazon EC2 instances that enables customers to run applications requiring high levels of inter-node communications at scale on AWS. Its custom-built operating system (OS) bypass hardware interface enhances the performance of inter-instance communications, which is critical to scaling HPC and machine learning applications. EFA provides a low-latency, low-jitter channel for inter-instance communications, enabling your tightly-coupled HPC or distributed machine learning applications to scale to thousands of cores. EFA uses libfabric interface and libfabric APIs for communications, which are supported by most HPC programming models. For more information, see Elastic Fabric Adapter.

The other solutions are not suitable for optimizing the HPC environment for networking and storage. AWS Global Accelerator is a networking service that helps you improve the availability, performance, and security of your public applications by using the AWS global network. It provides two global static public IPs, deterministic routing, fast failover, and TCP termination at the edge for your application endpoints. However, it does not support OS-bypass capabilities or high-performance file systems that are required for HPC and machine learning applications. For more information, see AWS Global Accelerator.

Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds, all within a developer-friendly environment. CloudFront is integrated with AWS services such as Amazon S3, Amazon EC2, AWS Elemental Media Services, AWS Shield, AWS WAF, and AWS Lambda@Edge. However, CloudFront is not designed for HPC and machine learning applications that require high levels of inter-node communications and fast storage. For more information, see [Amazon CloudFront].

AWS Elastic Beanstalk is an easy-to-use service for deploying and scaling web applications and services developed with Java, .NET, PHP, Node.js, Python, Ruby, Go, and Docker on familiar servers such as Apache, Nginx, Passenger, and IIS. You can simply upload your code and Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment, from capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling to application health monitoring. However, Elastic Beanstalk is not optimized for HPC and machine learning applications that require OS-bypass capabilities and high-performance file systems. For more information, see [AWS Elastic Beanstalk].

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is the least effort, as it does not require any additional AWS services, custom scripts, or data processing steps. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. You can use Athena to query CloudTrail logs directly from the S3 bucket where they are stored, without any data loading or transformation. You can also use the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the Athena API to run and manage your queries.

It is effective, as it allows you to filter, aggregate, and join CloudTrail log data using SQL syntax. You can use various SQL functions and operators to specify the criteria for identifyingAccess Denied and Unauthorized errors, such as the error code, the user identity, the event source, the event name, the event time, and the resource ARN. You can also use subqueries, views, and common table expressions to simplify and optimize your queries.

It is flexible, as it allows you to customize and save your queries for future use. You can also export the query results to other formats, such as CSV or JSON, or integrate them with other AWS services, such as Amazon QuickSight, for further analysis and visualization.

Deletion protection is a feature of DynamoDB that prevents accidental deletion of tables. When deletion protection is enabled, you cannot delete a table unless you explicitly disable it first. This adds an extra layer of security and reduces the risk of data loss and operational disruption. Deletion protection is easy to enable and disable using the AWS Management Console, the AWSCLI, or the DynamoDB API. This solution has the least operational overhead, as you do not need to create, manage, or invoke any additional resources or services. References:

Using deletion protection to protect your table

Preventing Accidental Table Deletion in DynamoDB

Amazon DynamoDB now supports table deletion protection

To maintain predictable database performance and ensure that the Lambda invocations do not overload the database with too many connections, a solutions architect should point the client driver at an RDS proxy endpoint and deploy the Lambda functions inside a VPC. An RDS proxy is a fully managed database proxy that allows applications to share connections to a database, improving database availability and scalability. By using an RDS proxy, the Lambda functions can reuse existing connections, rather than creating new ones for every invocation, reducing the connection overhead and latency. Deploying the Lambda functions inside a VPC allows them to access the private RDS DB instance securely and efficiently, without exposing it to the public internet. References:

Using Amazon RDS Proxy with AWS Lambda

Configuring a Lambda function to access resources in a VPC

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is a scalable and reliable service that can ingest, buffer, and process streaming data in real-time. It can handle large traffic spikes and preserve the order ofthe incoming data records. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that can process the data streams from Kinesis Data Streams without requiring any infrastructure management. It can also scale automatically to match the throughput of the data stream. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed, highly available, and fast NoSQL database that can store the processed updates from Lambda. It can also handle high write throughput and provide consistent performance. By using these services, the solutions architect can design a solution that meets the requirements of the company with the least operational overhead.

These options are the most suitable ways to configure the network architecture to provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Option A enables and configures enhanced networking on each EC2 instance, which is a feature that improves the network performance of the instance by providing higher bandwidth, lower latency, and lower jitter. Enhanced networking uses single root I/O virtualization (SR-IOV) or Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA) to provide direct access to the network hardware. You can enable and configure enhanced networking by choosing a supported instance type and a compatible operating system, and installing the required drivers. Option C runs the EC2 instances in a cluster placement group, which is a logical grouping of instanceswithin a single Availability Zone that are placed close together on the same underlying hardware. Cluster placement groups provide the lowest network latency and the highest network throughput among the placement group options. You can run the EC2 instances in a cluster placement group by creating a placement group and launching the instances into it.

Option B is not suitable because grouping the EC2 instances in separate accounts does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Separate accounts are used to isolate and organize resources for different purposes, such as security, billing, or compliance. However, they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, grouping the EC2 instances in separate accounts would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would require setting up cross-account networking and permissions.

Option D is not suitable because attaching multiple elastic network interfaces to each EC2 instance does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Elastic network interfaces are virtual network interfaces that can be attached to EC2 instances to provide additional network capabilities, such as multiple IP addresses, multiple subnets, or enhanced security. However, they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, attaching multiple elastic network interfaces to each EC2 instance would consume additional resources and limit the instance type choices.

Option E is not suitable because using Amazon EBS optimized instance types does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Amazon EBS optimized instance types are instances that provide dedicated bandwidth for Amazon EBS volumes, which are block storage volumes that can be attached to EC2 instances. EBS optimized instance types improve the performance and consistency of the EBS volumes, but they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, using EBS optimized instance types would incur additional costs and may not be necessary for the streaming data workload. References:

Enhanced networking on Linux

Placement groups

Elastic network interfaces

Amazon EBS-optimized instances

To protect the web application from DDoS attacks originating from random IP addresses, a solutions architect should subscribe to AWS Shield Advanced and engage the AWS DDoS Response Team (DRT) to integrate mitigating controls into the service. AWS Shield Advanced is a managed service that provides protection against large and sophisticated DDoS attacks, with access to 24/7 support and response from the DRT. The DRT can help the city configure proactive and reactive safeguards, such as AWS WAF rules, rate-based rules, and network ACLs, to block malicious traffic and improve the application’s resilience. The service also provides an audit trail for the DDoS sources through detailed attack reports and Amazon CloudWatch metrics.

These options are the best solutions because they allow the company to run the application with Docker containers in the AWS Cloud using a managed service that scales automatically and does not require any infrastructure to manage. By using AWS Fargate, the company can launch and run containers without having to provision, configure, or scale clusters of EC2 instances. Fargate allocates the right amount of compute resources for each container and scales them up or down as needed. By using Amazon ECS or Amazon EKS, the company can choose the container orchestration platform that suits its needs. Amazon ECS is a fully managed service that integrates with other AWS services and simplifies the deployment and management of containers. Amazon EKS is a managed service that runs Kubernetes on AWS and provides compatibility with existing Kubernetes tools and plugins.

C. Provision an Amazon API Gateway API Connect the API to AWS Lambda to run the containers. This option is not feasible because AWS Lambda does not support running Docker containers directly. Lambda functions are executed in a sandboxed environment that is isolated from other functions and resources. To run Docker containers on Lambda, the company would need to use a custom runtime or a wrapper library that emulates the Docker API, which can introduce additional complexity and overhead.

D. Use Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) with Amazon EC2 worker nodes. This option is not optimal because it requires the company to manage the EC2 instances that host the containers. The company would need to provision, configure, scale, patch, and monitor the EC2 instances, which can increase the operational overhead and infrastructure costs.

E. Use Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) with Amazon EC2 worker nodes. This option is not ideal because it requires the company to manage the EC2 instances that host the containers. The company would need to provision, configure, scale, patch, and monitor the EC2 instances, which can increase the operational overhead and infrastructure costs.

Amazon Inspector is an automated security assessment service that helps improve the security and compliance of applications deployed on AWS. Amazon Inspector automatically assesses applications for exposure, vulnerabilities, and deviations from best practices. After performing an assessment, Amazon Inspector produces a detailed list of security findings prioritized by level of severity1. Amazon Inspector can scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities and provide a report of each instance’s patch status. AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager is a capability of AWS Systems Manager that automates the process of patching managed nodes with both security-related updates and other types of updates. Patch Manager uses patch baselines, which include rules for auto-approving patches within days of their release, in addition to optional lists of approved and rejected patches. Patch Manager can patch fleets of Amazon EC2 instances, edge devices, on-premises servers, and virtual machines (VMs) by operating system type2. PatchManager can patch the EC2 instances on a regular schedule and provide a report of each instance’s patch status. Therefore, the combination of Amazon Inspector and AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager will meet the requirements of the question.

The other options are not valid because:

Amazon Macie is a security service that uses machine learning to automatically discover, classify, and protect sensitive data in AWS. Amazon Macie does not scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities, but rather for data classification and protection3. A cron job is a Linux command for scheduling a task to be executed sometime in the future. A cron job is not a reliable way to patch the EC2 instances on a regular schedule, as it may fail or be interrupted by other processes4.

Amazon GuardDuty is a threat detection service that continuously monitors for malicious activity and unauthorized behavior to protect your AWS accounts and workloads. Amazon GuardDuty does not scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities, but rather for network and API activity anomalies5. AWS Systems Manager Session Manager is a fully managed AWS Systems Manager capability that lets you manage your Amazon EC2 instances, edge devices, on-premises servers, and virtual machines (VMs) through an interactive one-click browser-based shell or the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI). Session Manager does not patch theEC2 instances on a regular schedule, but rather provides secure and auditable node management2.

Amazon Detective is a security service that makes it easy to analyze, investigate, and quickly identify the root cause of potential security issues or suspicious activities. Amazon Detective does not scan the EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities, but rather collects and analyzes data from AWS sources such as Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon VPC Flow Logs, and AWS CloudTrail. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus that makes it easy to connect applications using data from your own applications, integrated Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) applications, and AWS services. EventBridge delivers a stream of real-time data from event sources, such as Zendesk, Datadog, or Pagerduty, and routes that data to targets like AWS Lambda. EventBridge does not patch the EC2 instances on a regular schedule, but rather triggers actions based on events.

The solution that will reduce the launch time of the application during the next testing phase is to launch the EC2 On-Demand Instances with hibernation turned on and configure EC2 Auto Scaling warm pools. This solution allows the application to resume from a hibernated state instead of starting from scratch, which can save time and resources. Hibernation preserves the memory (RAM) state of the EC2 instances to the root EBS volume and then stops the instances.When the instances are resumed, they restore theirmemory state from the EBS volume and become productive quickly. EC2 Auto Scaling warm pools can be used to maintain a pool of pre-initialized instances that are ready to scale out when needed. Warm pools can also support hibernated instances, which can further reduce the launch time and cost of scaling out.

The other solutions are not as effective as the first one because they either do not reduce the launch time, do not guarantee availability, or do not use On-Demand Instances as required. Launching two or more EC2 On-Demand Instances with auto scaling features does not reduce the launch time of the application, as each instance still has to go through the initialization process. Launching EC2 Spot Instances does not guarantee availability, as Spot Instances can be interrupted by AWS at any time when there is a higher demand for capacity. Launching EC2 On-Demand Instances with Capacity Reservations does not reduce the launch time of the application, as it only ensures that there is enough capacity available for the instances, but does not pre-initialize them.

An Application Load Balancer (ALB) is a type of Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) that distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, Lambda functions, and IP addresses, in multiple Availability Zones1. An ALB can be internet-facing or internal. An internet-facing ALB has a public DNS name that clients can use to send requests over the internet1. An internal ALB has a private DNS name that clients can use to send requests within a VPC1. This solution meets the requirements of the question because:

It allows external internet traffic to connect to the web server on ports 80 and 443, as the ALB listens for requests on these ports and forwards them to the EC2 instance in the private subnet1.

It does not violate the corporate security mandate, as the EC2 instance is launched in a private subnet and does not have a public IPaddress or a route to an internet gateway2.

It reduces the operational overhead, as the ALB is a fully managed service that handles the tasks of load balancing, health checking, scaling, and security1.

A public NAT gateway enables instances in a private subnet to send outbound traffic to the internet, while preventing the internet from initiating connections with the instances. A public NAT gateway requires an elastic IP address and a route to the internet gateway for the VPC. A private NAT gateway enables instances in a private subnet to connect to other VPCs or on-premises networks through a transit gateway or a virtual private gateway. A private NAT gateway does not require an elastic IP address or an internet gateway. Both private and public NAT gateways map the source private IPv4 address of the instances to the private IPv4 address of the NAT gateway, but in the case of a public NAT gateway, the internet gateway then maps the private IPv4 address of the public NAT gateway to the elastic IP address associated with the NAT gateway. When sending response traffic to the instances, whether it’s a public or private NAT gateway, the NAT gateway translates the address back to the original source IP address.

Creating public NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances (option A) is not a valid solution, as the NAT gateways would not have a route to the internet gateway. Creating private NAT gateways in the same private subnets as the EC2 instances (option B) is also not a valid solution, as the instances would not be able to access the internet through the private NATgateways. Creating private NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances (option D) is not a valid solution either, as the internet gateway would drop the traffic from the private NAT gateways.

Therefore, the only valid solution is to create public NAT gateways in public subnets in the same VPCs as the EC2 instances (option C), as this would allow the instances to access the internet through the public NAT gateways and the internet gateway. References:

NAT gateways - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

NAT gateway use cases - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Amazon Web Services – Introduction to NAT Gateways

What is AWS NAT Gateway? - KnowledgeHut

A write-through caching strategy adds or updates data in the cache whenever data is written to the database. This ensures that the data in the cache is always consistent with the data in the database. A write-through caching strategy also reduces the cache miss penalty, as data is always available in the cache when it is requested. However, a write-through caching strategy can increase the write latency, as data has to be written to both the cache and the database. A write-through caching strategy is suitable for applications that require high data consistency and low read latency.

A lazy loading caching strategy only loads data into the cache when it is requested, and updates the cache when there is a cache miss. This can result in stale data in the cache, as data is not updated in the cache when it is changed in the database. A lazy loading caching strategy is suitable for applications that can tolerate some data inconsistency and have a low cache miss rate.

An adding TTL caching strategy assigns a time-to-live (TTL) value to each data item in the cache, and removes the data from the cache when the TTL expires. This can help prevent stale data in the cache, as data is periodically refreshed from the database. However, an adding TTL caching strategy can also increase the cache miss rate, as data can be evicted from the cache before it is requested. An adding TTL caching strategy is suitable for applications that have a high cache hit rate and can tolerate some data inconsistency.

An AWS AppConfig caching strategy is not a valid option, as AWS AppConfig is a service that enables customers to quickly deploy validated configurations to applications of any size and scale. AWS AppConfig does not provide a caching layer for web applications.

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF allows users to create rules that block, allow, or count web requests based on customizable web security rules. One of the types of rules that can be created is an IP match rule, which allows users to specify a list of IP addresses or IP address ranges that they want to allow or block. By modifying the configuration of AWS WAF to add an IP match condition to block the malicious IP address, the solution architect can prevent the attacker from accessing the website through the CloudFront distribution and the ALB.

The other options are not correct because they do not effectively block the malicious IP address from accessing the website. Modifying the network ACL on the CloudFront distribution or the EC2 instances in the target groups behind the ALB will not work because network ACLs are stateless and do not evaluate traffic at the application layer. Modifying the security groups for the EC2 instances in the target groups behind the ALB will not work because security groups are stateful and only evaluate traffic at the instance level, not at the load balancer level.

The company wants to reduce the compute costs and maintain service latency for its Lambda functions that process a constantly increasing number of messages in a message queue. The Lambda functions use CPU intensive code to process the messages. To meet these requirements, a solutions architect should recommend the following solution:

Configure provisioned concurrency for the Lambda functions. Provisioned concurrency is the number of pre-initialized execution environments that are allocated to the Lambda functions. These execution environments are prepared to respond immediately to incoming function requests, reducing the cold start latency. Configuring provisioned concurrency also helps to avoid throttling errors due to reaching the concurrency limit of the Lambda service.

Increase the memory according to AWS Compute Optimizer recommendations. AWS Compute Optimizer is a service that provides recommendations for optimal AWS resource configurations based on your utilization data. By increasing the memory allocated to the Lambda functions, you can also increase the CPU power and improve the performance of your CPU intensive code.AWS Compute Optimizer can help you find the optimal memory size for your Lambda functions based on your workload characteristics and performance goals.

This solution will reduce the compute costs by avoiding unnecessary over-provisioning of memory and CPU resources, and maintain service latency by using provisioned concurrency and optimal memory size for the Lambda functions.

This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead because it leverages the features of IAM Identity Center and AWS Control Tower to centrally manage multiple user permissions across all the accounts. By creating new groups and permission sets, the company can assign fine-grained permissions to the developer and administrator teams based on their roles and responsibilities. The permission sets are applied to the groups at the organization level, so they are automatically inherited by all the accounts in the organization. When new users are hired, the company only needs to add them to the appropriate group in IAM Identity Center, and they will automatically get the permissions assigned to that group. This simplifies the user management and reduces the manual effort of assigning permissions to each user individually.

To migrate the DNS hosting service to a more resilient managed DNS service on AWS, the company should use Amazon Route 53, which is a highly available and scalable cloud DNS web service. Route 53 can host public DNS records for the company’s domain name and provide reliable and secure DNS resolution. To rapidly migrate the DNS hosting service, thecompanyshould create a public hosted zone for the domain name in Route 53, which is a container for the domain’s DNS records. Then, the company should import the zone file containing the domain records hosted by the previous provider, which is a text file that defines the DNS records for the domain. This way, the company can quickly transfer the existing DNS records to Route 53 without manually creating them. After importing the zone file, the company should update the domain registrar to use the name servers that Route 53 assigns to the hosted zone. This will ensure that DNS queries for the domain name are routed to Route 53 and resolved by the imported records.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is operationally efficient, as it only requires one transit gateway and one transit VIF to connect the Direct Connect connection to all the VPCs in the same AWS Region. The transit gateway acts as a regional network hub that simplifies the network management and reduces the number of VIFs and gateways needed.

It is scalable, as it can support up to 5000 attachments per transit gateway, which can include VPCs, VPNs, Direct Connect gateways, and peering connections. The transit gateway can also be connected to other transit gateways in different Regions or accounts using peering connections, enabling cross-Region and cross-account connectivity.

It is flexible, as it allows each VPC to communicate with all other VPCs and on-premises networks using dynamic routing protocols such as Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The transit gateway’s route propagation feature automatically propagates the routes from the attached VPCs and VPNs to the transit gateway route table, eliminating the need to manually update the route tables.

To meet the requirements of the web application in the most secure manner, the company should create a Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint, create a resolver rule, and associate the resolver rule with the VPC. This solution will allow the application to use private DNS records to communicate with the on-premises services from a VPC. Route 53 Resolver is a service that enables DNS resolution between on-premises networks and AWS VPCs. An outbound endpoint is a set of IP addresses that Resolver uses to forward DNS queries from a VPC to resolvers on an on-premises network. A resolver rule is a rule that specifies the domain names for which Resolver forwards DNS queries to the IP addresses that you specify in the rule. By creating an outbound endpoint and a resolver rule, and associating them with the VPC, the company can securely resolve DNS queries for the on-premises services using private DNS records12.

The other options are not correct because they do not meet the requirements or are not secure. Creating a Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint, creating a resolver rule, and associating the resolver rule with the VPC is not correct because this solution will allow DNS queries from on-premises networks to access resources in a VPC, not vice versa. An inbound endpoint is a set of IP addresses that Resolver uses to receive DNS queries from resolvers on an on-premises network1. Creating a Route 53 private hosted zone and associating it with the VPC is not correct because this solution will only allow DNS resolution for resources within the VPC or other VPCs that are associated with the same hosted zone. A private hosted zone is a container for DNS records that are only accessible from one or more VPCs3. Creating a Route 53 public hosted zone and creating a record for each service to allow service communication is not correct because this solution will expose the on-premises services to the public internet, which is not secure. A public hosted zone is a container for DNS records that are accessible from anywhere on the internet3.

The simplest and most effective way to ensure that all data that is written to the EBS volumes is encrypted at rest is to create the EBS volumes as encrypted volumes. You can do this by selecting the encryption option when you create a new EBS volume, or by copying an existing unencrypted volume to a new encrypted volume. You can also specify the AWS KMS key that you want to use for encryption, or use the default AWS-managed key. When you attach the encrypted EBS volumes to the EC2 instances, the data will be automatically encrypted and decrypted by the EC2 host. This solution does not require any additional IAM roles, tags, or policies.

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it leverages the serverless and event-driven capabilities of AWS Lambda and Amazon EventBridge. AWS Lambda allows you to run code without provisioning or managing servers, and you pay only for the compute time you consume. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus service that lets you connect your applications with data from various sources and routes that data to targets such as AWS Lambda. By using Amazon EventBridge, you can create a rule that triggers a Lambda function to run the program when reports are requested, and you can also schedule the rule to run during the last week of each month. This way, you can generate reports in the least amount of time and pay only for the resources you use.

This solution will meet the requirements because Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP is a fully managed service that provides highly reliable, scalable, and feature-rich file storage built on NetApp’s popular ONTAP file system. FSx for ONTAP supports both NFS and SMB protocols, which means it can be accessed by both Linux and Windows applications without code changes. FSx for ONTAP also eliminates data duplication and inefficient resource usage by automatically tiering infrequently accessed data to a lower-cost storage tier and providing storage efficiency features such as deduplication and compression. FSx for ONTAP also integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon S3, AWS Backup, and AWS CloudFormation. By migrating the applications to Amazon EC2 instances, the company can leverage the scalability, security, and performance of AWS compute resources. 

To ensure that the shopping cart data is preserved at all times, a solutions architect should configure Amazon ElastiCache for Redis to cache catalog data from Amazon DynamoDB and shopping cart data from the user’s session. This solution has the following benefits:

It offers the lowest possible latency from the application, as ElastiCache for Redis is a blazing fast in-memory data store that provides sub-millisecond latency to power internet-scale real-time applications1.

It scales with traffic volume, as ElastiCache for Redis supports horizontal scaling by adding more nodes or shards to the cluster, and vertical scaling by changing the node type2.

It ishighly available, as ElastiCache for Redis supports replication across multiple Availability Zones and automatic failover in case of a primary node failure3.

It preserves user session data even if the user is disconnected and reconnects, as ElastiCache for Redis can store session data, such as user login information and shopping cart contents, in a persistent and durable manner using snapshots or AOF (append-only file) persistence4.

To predict the resources needed for manufacturing processes each month using historical values that are currently stored in an Amazon S3 bucket, a solutions architect should use Amazon SageMaker to train a model by using the historical data in the S3 bucket, and deploy an Amazon SageMaker model and create a SageMaker endpoint for inference. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides an easy way to build, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models. The solutions architect can use the built-in algorithms or frameworks provided by SageMaker, or bring their own custom code, to train a model using the historical data in the S3 bucket as input. The trained model can then be deployed to a SageMaker endpoint, which is ascalable and secure web service that can handle requests for predictions from the application. The solutions architect does not need to have any ML experience or manage any infrastructure to use SageMaker.

AWS Control Tower is a fully managed service that simplifies the setup and governance of a secure, compliant, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and it enables governance using controls you can choose from a pre-packaged list. The landing zone is a well-architected, multi-account baseline that follows AWS best practices. Controls implement governance rules for security, compliance, and operations. AWS Security Hub is a service that provides a comprehensive view of your security posture across your AWS accounts. It aggregates, organizes, and prioritizes security alerts and findings from multiple AWS services, such as Amazon GuardDuty, Amazon Inspector, Amazon Macie, AWS Firewall Manager, and AWS IAM Access Analyzer, as well as from AWS Partner solutions. AWS Security Hub continuously monitors your environment using automatedcompliance checks based on the AWS best practices and industry standards, such as the AWS Foundational Security Best Practices (FSBP) standard. AWS Control Tower Account Factory is a feature that automates the provisioning of new AWS accounts that are preconfigured to meet your business, security, and compliance requirements. By deploying an AWS Control Tower environment in the Organizations management account, you can leverage the existing organization structure and policies, and enable AWS Security Hub and AWS Control Tower Account Factory in the environment. This way, you can audit all API calls and logins in any existing or new AWS account, monitor the compliance status of each account with the FSBP standard, and provision new accounts with ease and consistency. This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead, as you do not need to manage any infrastructure, perform any data migration, or submit any requests for changes.

The most suitable solution for the company’s requirements is to enable Default Host Configuration Management in Systems Manager to manage the EC2 instances. This solution will allow the company to patch the EC2 instances without disrupting the running applications and without manually creating or modifying IAM roles or users.

Default Host Configuration Management is a feature of AWS Systems Manager that enables Systems Manager to manage EC2 instances automatically as managed instances. A managed instance is an EC2 instance that is configured for use with Systems Manager. The benefits of managing instances with Systems Manager include the following:

Connect to EC2 instances securely using Session Manager.

Perform automated patch scans using Patch Manager.

View detailed information about instances using Systems Manager Inventory.

Track and manage instances using Fleet Manager.

Keep SSM Agent up to date automatically.

Default Host Configuration Management makes it possible to manage EC2 instances without having to manually create an IAM instance profile. Instead, Default Host Configuration Management creates and applies a default IAM role to ensure that Systems Manager has permissions to manage all instances in the Region and account where it is activated.If thepermissions provided are not sufficient for the use case, the default IAM role can be modified or replaced with a custom role1.

The other options are not correct because they either have more operational overhead or do not meet the requirements. Creating a new IAM role, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the new IAM role, and attaching the new IAM role and the existing IAM role to the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM roles, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.The AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy is a managed policy that grants permissions for Systems Manager core functionality2. Creating an IAM user, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the IAM user, and configuring Systems Manager to use the IAM user to manage the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM users, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.An IAM user is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a single person or application3. Removing the existing policies from the existing IAM role and adding the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the existing IAM role is not correct because this solution may disrupt the running applications that rely on the existing policies for accessing RDS databases.An IAM role is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a service or entity4.

Recycle Bin is a data recovery feature that enables you to restore accidentally deleted Amazon EBS snapshots and EBS-backed AMIs. When using Recycle Bin, if your resources are deleted, they are retained in the Recycle Bin for a time period that you specify before being permanently deleted. You can restore a resource from the Recycle Bin at any timebefore its retention period expires. This solution has the least operational overhead, as you do not need to create, copy, or upload any additional resources. You can also manage tags and permissions for AMIs in the Recycle Bin. AMIs in the Recycle Bin do not incur any additional charges. References:

Recover AMIs from the Recycle Bin

Recover an accidentally deleted Linux AMI

This solution meets the requirements because it requires the least amount of infrastructure management and guarantees exactly-once delivery for application messaging. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You only pay for the compute time you consume.Lambda scales automatically with the size of your workload. Amazon SQS FIFO queues are designed to ensure that messages are processed exactly once, in the exact order that they are sent. FIFO queues have high availability and deliver messages in a strict first-in, first-out order. You can use Amazon SQS to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. References: AWS Lambda, Amazon SQS FIFO queues

Point-in-time recovery (PITR) for DynamoDB is a feature that enables you to restore your table data to any point in time during the last 35 days. PITR helps protect your table from accidental write or delete operations, such as a test script writing to a production table or a user issuing a wrong command. PITR is easy to use, fully managed, fast, and scalable. You can enable PITR with a single click in the DynamoDB console or with a simple API call. You can restore a table to a new table using the console, the AWS CLI, or the DynamoDB API. PITR does not consume any provisioned table capacity and has no impact on the performance or availability of your production applications. PITR meets the requirements of the company with the least operationaloverhead, as it does not require any manual backup creation, scheduling, or maintenance. It also provides per-second granularity for restoring the table to any point within the last 24 hours.

These options are the most suitable ways to design a shared storage solution for a web application that is deployed across multiple Availability Zones and requires strong consistency. Option B uses Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) as a shared file system that can be mounted on multiple EC2 instances in different Availability Zones. Amazon EFS provides high availability, durability, scalability, and performance for file-based workloads. It also supports strong consistency, which means that any changes made to the file system are immediately visible to all clients. Option E uses Amazon S3 as a shared object store that can store the web content and serve it through Amazon CloudFront, a content delivery network (CDN). Amazon S3 provides high availability, durability, scalability, and performance for object-based workloads. It also supports strong consistency for read-after-write and list operations, which means that any changes made to the objects are immediately visible to all clients. By setting the metadata for the Cache-Control header to no-cache, the web content can be prevented from being cached by the browsers or the CDN edge locations, ensuring that the latest content is always delivered to the users.

Option A is not suitable because using AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway as a shared storage solution for a web application is not efficient or scalable. AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides block storage volumes that can be mounted on-premises or on EC2 instances as iSCSI devices. It is useful for migrating or backing up data to AWS, but it is not designed for serving web content or providing strong consistency. Moreover, using Volume Gateway would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the native AWS storage services.

Option C is not suitable because creating a shared Amazon EBS volume and mounting it on multiple EC2 instances is not possible or reliable. Amazon EBS is a block storage service that provides persistent and high-performance volumes for EC2 instances. However, EBS volumescan only be attached to one EC2 instance at a time, and they are constrained to a single Availability Zone. Therefore, creating a shared EBS volume for a web application that is deployed across multiple Availability Zones is not feasible. Moreover, EBS volumes do not support strong consistency, which means that any changes made to the volume may not be immediately visible to other clients.

Option D is not suitable because using AWS DataSync to perform continuous synchronization of data between EC2 hosts in the Auto Scaling group is not efficient or scalable. AWS DataSync is a data transfer service that helps you move large amounts of data to and from AWS storage services. It is useful for migrating or archiving data, but it is not designed for serving web content or providing strong consistency. Moreover, using DataSync would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the native AWS storage services. References:

What Is Amazon Elastic File System?

What Is Amazon Simple Storage Service?

What Is Amazon CloudFront?

What Is AWS Storage Gateway?

What Is Amazon Elastic Block Store?

What Is AWS DataSync?

The most suitable solution for optimizing the user experience by providing the lowest latency for content uploads is to upload and store content in Amazon S3 and use S3 Transfer Acceleration for the uploads. This solution will enable the company to leverage the AWS global network and edge locations to speed up the data transfer between the users and the S3 buckets.

Amazon S3 is a storage service that provides scalable, durable, and highly available object storage for any type of data.Amazon S3 allows users to store and retrieve datafrom anywhere on the web, and offers various features such as encryption, versioning, lifecycle management, and replication1.

S3 Transfer Acceleration is a feature of Amazon S3 that helps users transfer data to and from S3 buckets more quickly. S3 Transfer Acceleration works by using optimized network paths and Amazon’s backbone network to accelerate data transfer speeds.Userscan enable S3 Transfer Acceleration for their buckets and use a distinct URL to access them, such as .s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com2.

The other options are not correct because they either do not provide the lowest latency or are not suitable for the use case. Uploading and storing content in Amazon S3 and using Amazon CloudFront for the uploads is not correct because this solution is not designed for optimizing uploads, but rather for optimizing downloads. Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that helps users distribute their content globally with low latency and high transfer speeds.CloudFront works by caching the content at edge locations around the world, so that users can access it quickly and easily from anywhere3. Uploading content to Amazon EC2 instances in the Region that is closest to the user and copying the data to Amazon S3 is not correct because this solution adds unnecessary complexity and cost to the process. Amazon EC2 is a computing service that provides scalable and secure virtual servers in the cloud.Users can launch, stop, or terminate EC2 instances as needed, and choose from various instance types, operating systems, and configurations4. Uploading and storing content in Amazon S3 in the Region that is closest to the user and using multiple distributions of Amazon CloudFront is not correct because this solution is not cost-effective or efficient for the use case. As mentioned above, Amazon CloudFront is a CDN that helps users distribute their content globally with low latency and high transfer speeds.However, creating multiple CloudFront distributions for each Region would incur additional charges and management overhead, and would not be necessary since 90% of the content is consumed within the same Region where it is uploaded3.

Amazon Aurora Serverless v2 is a cost-effective solution that can automatically scale the database capacity up and down based on the application’s needs. It can handle unpredictable traffic spikes without requiring any provisioning or management of database instances. It is compatible with PostgreSQL and offers high performance, availability, and durability1. References: 1: AWS Ramp-Up Guide: Architect2, page 312: AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Associate exam guide3, page 9.

The most cost-effective solution for the online video game company is to configure a Network Load Balancer with the required protocol and ports for the internet traffic and specify the EC2 instances as the targets. This solution will enable the company to handle millions of UDP requests per second with ultra-low latency and high performance.

A Network Load Balancer is a type of Elastic Load Balancing that operates at the connection level (Layer 4) and routes traffic to targets (EC2 instances, microservices, or containers) within Amazon VPC based on IP protocol data. A Network Load Balancer is ideal for load balancing of both TCP and UDP traffic, as it is capable of handling millions of requests per second while maintaining high throughput at ultra-low latency. A Network Load Balancer also preserves the source IP address of the clients to the back-end applications, which can be useful for logging or security purposes1.

A read replica is a copy of the primary database that supports read-only queries. By creating a read replica, you can offload the read workload from the primary database and improve its performance. The script can query the read replica without affecting the critical application that uses the primary database. This solution also has the least operational overhead, as you do not need to modify the script, export the data manually, or manage a cache cluster. References:

Working with PostgreSQL, MySQL, and MariaDB Read Replicas

Amazon RDS Performance Insights

The least outstanding requests (LOR) algorithm is a load balancing algorithm that distributes incoming requests to the target with the fewest outstanding requests. This helps to avoid overloading any single target and improves the overall performance and availability of the web application. The LOR algorithmcan use the RequestCount and TargetResponseTime CloudWatch metrics to determine the number of outstanding requests and the response time of each target. These metrics measure the number of requests processed by each target and the time elapsed after the request leaves the load balancer until a response from the target is received by the load balancer, respectively. By using these metrics, the LOR algorithm can route new requests to the targets that are less busy and more responsive, and avoid sending requests to the targets that are already overloaded or slow. This solution meets the requirements of the company.

AWS Systems Manager Session Manager is a service that enables you to securely connect to your EC2 instances without using SSH keys or bastion hosts. You can use Session Manager to access your instances through the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the AWS SDKs. Session Manager uses IAM policies and roles to control who can access which instances. By attaching the AmazonSSMManagedlnstanceCore IAM policy to an IAM role that is associated with the EC2 instances, you grant the Session Manager service the necessary permissions to perform actions on your instances. You also need to attachanother IAM policy to the developers’ IAM users or roles that allows them to start sessions to the instances. Session Manager uses the AWS Systems Manager Agent (SSM Agent) that is installed by default on Amazon Linux 2 and other supported Linux distributions. Session Manager also encrypts all session data between your client and your instances, and streams session logs to Amazon S3, Amazon CloudWatch Logs, or both for auditing purposes. This solution is the most cost-effective, as it does not require any additional resources or services, such as bastion hosts, VPN connections, or NAT gateways. It also simplifies the security and management of SSH access, as it eliminates the need for SSH keys, port opening, or firewall rules. References:

What is AWS Systems Manager?

Setting up Session Manager

Getting started with Session Manager

Controlling access to Session Manager

Logging Session Manager activity

This solution meets the requirements because it allows the monitoring account to query and visualize observability data across the accounts by using CloudWatch. CloudWatch cross-account observability is a feature that enables a central monitoring account to view and interact with observability data shared by other accounts. To enable cross-account observability, the monitoring account needs to configure the types of data to be shared (metrics, logs, and traces) and the source accounts to be linked. The source accounts can be specified by account IDs, organization IDs, or organization paths. To share the data with the monitoring account, the source accounts need to deploy an AWS CloudFormation template provided by the monitoring account. This template creates an observability link resource that represents the link between the source account and the monitoring account. The template also creates a sink resource that represents an attachment point in the monitoring account. The source accounts can share theirobservability data with the sink in the monitoring account. The monitoring account can then use the CloudWatch console, API, or CLI to search, analyze, and correlate the observability data across the accounts. References: CloudWatch cross-account observability, Setting up CloudWatch cross-account observability, [Observability Access Manager API Reference]

The most suitable solution for the company’s compliance policy is to enable the restricted-ssh AWS Config managed rule and generate an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) notification when a noncompliant rule is created. This solution has the least operational overheadbecause it uses a predefined rule that is already available in AWS Config, which is a service that enables users to assess, audit, and evaluate the configurations of their AWS resources. The restricted-ssh rule checks whether security groups that are in use have inbound rules that allow SSH from 0.0.0.0/0 addresses, and reports them as noncompliant1. Users can configure the rule to send notifications to an Amazon SNS topic when a noncompliant change occurs, and subscribe to the topic to receive alerts via email, SMS, or other methods2.

The other options are not correct because they either have more operational overhead or do not meet the requirements. Writing an AWS Lambda script that monitors security groups for SSH being open to 0.0.0.0/0 addresses and creates a notification every time it finds one is not correct because it requires custom code development and maintenance, which adds complexity and cost to the solution. Creating an IAM role with permissions to globally open security groups and network ACLs, and creating an Amazon SNS topic to generate a notification every time the role is assumed by a user is not correct because it does not prevent or detect the creation of noncompliant rules by other users or roles, and it does not address the existing rules that may violate the policy. Configuring a service control policy (SCP) that prevents non-administrative users from creating or editing security groups, and creating a notification in the ticketing system when a user requests a rule that needs administrator permissions is not correct because it does not provide an automated solution for the policy enforcement and notification, and it may limit the flexibility and productivity of the users.

To design a resilient solution that can improve the recovery time for the system, a solutions architect should recommend creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to recover the EC2 instance in case of failure. This solution has the following benefits:

It allows the EC2 instance to be automatically recovered when a system status check failure occurs, such as loss of network connectivity, loss of system power, software issues on the physical host, or hardware issues on the physical host that impact network reachability1.

It preserves the instance ID, private IP addresses, Elastic IP addresses, and all instance metadata of the original instance. A recovered instance is identical to the original instance, except for any data that is in-memory, which is lost during the recovery process1.

It does not require any modification of the application code or the EC2 instance configuration. The solutions architect can create a CloudWatch alarm using the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the CloudWatch API2.

This combination of actions will provide high availability and minimum latency for global users by using AWS Global Accelerator and Application Load Balancers. AWS GlobalAccelerator is a networking service that helps you improve the availability, performance, and security of your internet-facing applications by using the AWS global network. It provides two global static public IPs that act as a fixed entry point to your application endpoints, such as Application Load Balancers, in multiple Regions1. Global Accelerator uses the AWS backbone network to route traffic to the optimal regional endpoint based on health, client location, and policies that you configure. It also offers TCP and UDP support, traffic encryption, and DDoS protection2. Application Load Balancers are external load balancers that distribute incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, in multiple Availability Zones. They support both HTTP and HTTPS (SSL/TLS) protocols, and offer advanced features such as content-based routing, health checks, and integration with other AWS services3. By creatingexternal Application Load Balancers in front of the application in each Region, you can ensure that the application can handle varying load patterns and scale on demand. By creating an AWS Global Accelerator accelerator to route traffic to the load balancers in each Region, you can leverage the performance, security, and availability of the AWS global network to deliver the best possible user experience.

CloudWatch cross-account observability is a feature that allows you to monitor and troubleshoot applications that span multiple accounts within a Region. You canseamlessly search, visualize, and analyze your metrics, logs, traces, and Application Insights applications in any of the linked accounts without account boundaries1. To enable CloudWatch cross-account observability, you need to set up one or more AWS accounts as monitoring accounts and link them with multiple source accounts. A monitoring account is a central AWS account that can view and interact with observability data shared by other accounts. A source account is an individual AWS account that shares observability data and resources with one or more monitoring accounts1. To create links between monitoring accounts and source accounts, you can use the CloudWatch console, the AWS CLI, or the AWS API. You can also use AWS Organizations to link accounts in an organization or organizational unit to the monitoring account1. CloudWatch provides a CloudFormation template that you can deploy in each source account to share observability data with the monitoring account. The template creates a sink resource in the monitoring account and an observability link resource in the source account. The template also creates the necessary IAM roles and policies to allow cross-account access to the observability data2. Therefore, the solution that meets the requirements of the question is to enable CloudWatch cross-account observability for the monitoring account and deploy the CloudFormation template provided by the monitoring account in each AWS account to share the data with the monitoring account.

The other options are not valid because:

Service control policies (SCPs) are a type of organization policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization, allowing youto ensure your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines3. SCPs do not provide access to CloudWatch in the monitoring account, but rather restrict the actions that users and roles can perform in the source accounts. SCPs are not required toenable CloudWatch cross-account observability, as the CloudFormation template creates the necessary IAM roles and policies for cross-account access2.

IAM users are entities that you create in AWS to represent the people or applications that use them to interact with AWS. IAM users can have permissions to access the resources in your AWS account4. Configuring a new IAM user in the monitoring account and an IAM policy in each AWS account to have access to query and visualize the CloudWatch data in the account is not a valid solution, as it does not enable CloudWatch cross-account observability. This solution would require the IAM user to switch between different accounts to view the observability data, which is not seamless and efficient. Moreover, this solution would not allow the IAM user to search, visualize, and analyze metrics, logs, traces, and Application Insights applications across multiple accounts in a single place1.

Cross-account IAM policies are policies that allow you to delegate access to resources that are in different AWS accounts that you own. You attach a cross-account policy to a user or group in one account, and then specify which accounts theuser or group can access5. Creating a new IAM user in the monitoring account and cross-account IAM policies in each AWS account is not avalid solution, as it does not enable CloudWatch cross-account observability. This solution would also require the IAM user to switch between different accounts to view the observability data, which is not seamless and efficient. Moreover, this solution would not allow the IAM user to search, visualize, and analyze metrics, logs, traces, and Application Insights applications across multiple accounts in a single place1.

AWS CloudFormationallows for the automated, repeatable setup of infrastructure, reducing human error and ensuring consistency.AWS Configprovides the ability to track changes in the infrastructure, ensuring that all changes are logged and auditable, which satisfies the requirement for tracking incremental changes.

Option A and C (AWS Organizations): AWS Organizations manage multiple accounts, but they are not designed for infrastructure setup or change tracking.

Option D (Service Catalog): Service Catalog is used for deploying products, not for setting up infrastructure or tracking changes.

AWS References:

AWS Config

AWS CloudFormation

AWSDirect Connectis the best solution for establishing a consistent, low-latency connection from an on-premises data center to AWS without using the public internet. Direct Connect offers dedicated, high-throughput, and low-latency network connections, which are ideal for performance-sensitive applications like a trading platform that processes high volumes of market data and stock trades.

Direct Connect provides a private connection to your AWS VPC, ensuring that data doesn't traverse the public internet, which enhances both security and performance consistency.

AWS References:

AWS Direct Connectprovides a dedicated network connection to AWS services with consistent, low-latency performance.

Best Practices for High Performance on AWSfor performance-sensitive workloads like trading platforms.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. AWS Client VPN: While this offers secure connectivity, it's over the public internet and is not designed for the low-latency, high-performance needs of a trading platform.

C. AWS PrivateLink: PrivateLink is used for connecting VPCs and services within AWS, but it is not designed for connecting on-premises data centers to AWS.

D. AWS Site-to-Site VPN: Although this provides secure connectivity, it uses the public internet, which can introduce latency and doesn't meet the low-latency requirements of the use case.

This solution is the most cost-effective and efficient way to break down costs per application.

Tagging Resources: By tagging all AWS resources with a specific key (e.g., "cost") and a value representing the application's name, you can easily identify and categorize costs associated with each application. This tagging strategy allows for granular tracking of costs within AWS.

Activating Cost Allocation Tags: Once tags are applied to resources, you need to activate cost allocation tags in the AWS Billing and Cost Management console. This ensures that the costs associated with each tag are included in your billing reports and can be used for cost analysis.

AWS Cost Explorer: Cost Explorer is a powerful tool that allows you to visualize, understand, and manage your AWS costs and usage over time. You can filter and group your cost data by the tags you’ve applied to resources, enabling you to easily see the cost breakdown for each application. Cost Explorer also supports generating regular reports, which can be scheduled and emailed to stakeholders.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (AWS Budgets): AWS Budgets is more focused on setting cost and usage thresholds and monitoring them, rather than providing detailed cost breakdowns by application.

Option B (Load Cost and Usage Reports into RDS): This approach is less cost-effective and involves more operational overhead, as it requires setting up and maintaining an RDS instance and running SQL queries.

Option D (AWS Billing and Cost Management Console): While you can download bills, this method is more manual and less dynamic compared to using Cost Explorer with activated tags.

AWS References:

AWS Tagging Strategies- Overview of how to use tagging to organize and track AWS resources.

AWS Cost Explorer- Details on how to use Cost Explorer to analyze costs.

To improve the performance of the primary RDS PostgreSQL database during business hours and reduce the load, the best solution is to create aread replicain the same region (us-east-1). This will offload the read-heavy operations (like generating reports) to the replica, reducing the burden on the primary instance, which improves overall performance. Additionally, read replicas provide near real-time replication, making them ideal for real-time reporting use cases.

Option A (cross-Region read replica): This adds unnecessary latency for real-time reporting and increased costs due to cross-region data transfer.

Option B (Multi-AZ): Multi-AZ deployments are for high availability and disaster recovery but won’t offload the read traffic, as the standby database cannot serve read requests.

Option C (AWS DMS replication): This adds complexity and is not as cost-effective as using an RDS read replica for the same region.

AWS References:

Amazon RDS Read Replicas

Amazon RDS Performance Best Practices

To meet the requirements for tagging and preventing instance creation or deletion without proper tags, the company can use a combination of AWS Organizations tag policies and service control policies (SCPs).

Tag Policies: These enforce specific tag values across resources. Creating a tag policy with required values (e.g., sensitive, non-sensitive) and attaching it to the appropriate organizational unit (OU) ensures consistency in tagging.

SCPs: SCPs can be used to enforce compliance by preventing instance creation without a tag and preventing tag deletion. These policies control actions at the account level across the organization.

Key AWS features:

Tag Policieshelp standardize tags across accounts, andSCPsenforce governance by restricting actions that violate the policies.

AWS Documentation: AWS best practices recommend using tag policies and SCPs to enforce compliance across multiple accounts within AWS Organizations​.

Amazon API Gatewayprovides a scalable and reusable solution for interacting with DynamoDB without requiring direct access by developers. By setting up a REST API with a POST methodthat integrates with DynamoDB'sPutItemaction, developers can submit data (such as user ratings) to the DynamoDB table through API Gateway, without having to directly interact with the database. This solution is serverless and minimizes operational overhead.

Option A: Using ALB with Lambda adds complexity and is less efficient for this use case.

Option B: While using Lambda is possible, API Gateway provides a more scalable, reusable interface.

Option C: SQS with Lambda introduces unnecessary components for a simple put operation.

AWS References:

Amazon API Gateway with DynamoDB

Option B: FSx for Lustre is designed for HPC workloads with high IOPS.

Option E: A cluster placement group ensures low-latency networking for HPC analytics workloads.

Option A: Amazon EFS is not optimized for HPC.

Option D: Mountpoint for S3 does not meet high IOPS needs.

This solution provides the most secure access for external support engineers with the least exposure to potential security risks.

AWS Systems Manager (SSM) and Session Manager: Systems Manager Session Manager allows secure and auditable access to EC2 instances without the need to open inbound SSH ports or manage SSH keys. This reduces the attack surface significantly. The SSM Agent must be installed and configured on all instances, and the instances must have an instance profile with the necessary IAM permissions to connect to Systems Manager.

IAM Identity Center: IAM Identity Center provides centralized management of access to the AWS Management Console for external support engineers. By using IAM Identity Center, youcan control console access securely and ensure that external engineers have the appropriate permissions based on their roles.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option B (Local IAM user credentials): This approach is less secure because it involves managing local IAM user credentials and does not leverage the centralized management and security benefits of IAM Identity Center.

Option C (Security group with SSH access): Allowing SSH access opens up the infrastructure to potential security risks, even when restricted by IP addresses. It also requires managing SSH keys, which can be cumbersome and less secure.

Option D (Bastion host): While a bastion host can secure SSH access, it still requires managing SSH keys and opening ports. This approach is less secure and more operationally intensive compared to using Session Manager.

AWS References:

AWS Systems Manager Session Manager- Documentation on using Session Manager for secure instance access.

AWS IAM Identity Center- Overview of IAM Identity Center and its capabilities for managing user access.

Creating aVPC endpointfor S3 and configuring abucket policyto allow access only from the endpoint ensures that only EC2 instances within the VPC can access the S3 bucket. This solutionimproves security by restricting access at the network level without the need for public internet access.

Option A (IAM policies): IAM policies alone cannot restrict access based on the network location.

Option B and D (Encryption): Encryption secures data at rest but does not restrict network access to the bucket.

AWS References:

Amazon S3 VPC Endpoints

AmazonEventBridgeAPI destinations allow you to send data from AWS to external systems, like Salesforce, using HTTP APIs, including those secured with OAuth. This provides a secure and scalable solution for sending messages from the order processing application to Salesforce.

Option A and B (SNS): SNS is not ideal for OAuth-secured external APIs and lacks the necessary OAuth integration.

Option D (MSK): Amazon MSK is a Kafka-based streaming solution, which is overkill for simple message forwarding to Salesforce.

AWS References:

Amazon EventBridge API Destinations

For processing thousands of images and generating large files while minimizing manual tasks and operational overhead, usingAWS Batchis the best solution. AWS Batch allows you to run large-scale, parallel, and managed batch computing jobs without needing to manage the underlying infrastructure.

AWS Batch: Automates the image processing jobs, dynamically allocating the necessary resources based on the job requirements, which reduces operational overhead.

AWS Step Functions: Orchestrates the entire image processing workflow, ensuring that tasks are executed in the correct sequence, improving manageability.

Amazon S3: Stores the processed files, providing scalable and cost-effective storage.

Option A (ECS with EC2 Spot Instances): While cost-effective, managing ECS and Spot Instances involves more operational effort.

Option C (Lambda with EC2 Spot): Lambda functions have size and duration limitations, making them less suited for large image processing tasks.

Option D (EC2 with Step Functions): Managing EC2 instances involves more overhead than using AWS Batch.

AWS References:

AWS Batch

AWS Step Functions

Option Auses an IAM role attached to the EC2 instance profile, enabling secure and automated access to Secrets Manager. This is the recommended approach.

Option Buses IAM users, which is less secure and harder to manage.

Option Cis not practical for accessing secrets programmatically.

Option Dviolates best practices by granting direct access to the EC2 instance.

Amazon Aurora Serverless is a cost-effective, on-demand, autoscaling configuration for Amazon Aurora. It automatically adjusts the database's capacity based on the current demand, which is ideal for workloads with variable and unpredictable usage patterns. Since the application is expected to be read-heavy with occasional writes and steady growth, Aurora Serverless can provide the necessary performance without requiring the management of database instances.

Cost-Optimization: Aurora Serverless only charges for the database capacity you use, making it a more cost-effective solution compared to always running provisioned database instances, especially for workloads with fluctuating demand.

Scalability: It automatically scales database capacity up or down based on actual usage, ensuring that you always have the right amount of resources available.

Performance: Aurora Serverless is built on the same underlying storage as Amazon Aurora, providing high performance and availability.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (RDS with Provisioned IOPS SSD): While Provisioned IOPS SSD ensures consistent performance, it is generally more expensive and less flexible compared to the autoscaling nature of Aurora Serverless.

Option C (DynamoDB with On-Demand Capacity): DynamoDB is a NoSQL database and may not be the best fit for applications requiring relational database features.

Option D (RDS with Magnetic Storage and Read Replicas): Magnetic storage is outdated and generally slower. While read replicas help with read-heavy workloads, the overall performance might not be optimal, and magnetic storage doesn’t provide the necessary performance.

AWS References:

Amazon Aurora Serverless- Information on how Aurora Serverless works and its use cases.

Amazon Aurora Pricing- Details on the cost-effectiveness of Aurora Serverless.

Amazon Macieis purpose-built for detecting PII in S3.

Option Auses EventBridge to filter SensitiveData findings and notify via SNS, meeting the requirements.

Options B and Dinvolve GuardDuty, which is not designed for PII detection.

Option Cuses SQS, which is less suitable for immediate notifications.

Requirement Analysis: Need secure, direct connectivity from an on-premises client to an RDS cluster, accessible only when in the office.

VPC with Private Subnets: Ensures the RDS cluster is not publicly accessible, enhancing security.

Site-to-Site VPN: Provides secure, encrypted connection between on-premises office and AWS VPC.

Implementation:

Create a VPC with two private subnets.

Launch the RDS cluster in the private subnets.

Set up a Site-to-Site VPN connection with a customer gateway in the office.

Conclusion: This setup ensures secure and direct connectivity with minimal exposure, meeting the requirement for secure access from the office.

References

AWS Site-to-Site VPN:AWS Site-to-Site VPN Documentation

Amazon RDS:Amazon RDS Documentation

Amazon QLDB is the most cost-effective and suitable service for maintainingimmutable, cryptographically verifiable logsof data changes. QLDB provides a fully managed ledgerdatabase with a built-in cryptographic hash chain, making it ideal for recording changes to accounting records, ensuring data integrity and security.

QLDB reduces operational overhead by offering fully managed services, so there’s no need for server management, and it’s built specifically to ensure immutability and verifiability, making it the best fit for the given requirements.

Option A (Redshift): Redshift is designed for analytics and not for immutable, cryptographically verifiable logs.

Option B (Neptune): Neptune is a graph database, which is not suitable for this use case.

Option C (Timestream): Timestream is a time series database optimized for time-stamped data, but it does not provide immutable or cryptographically verifiable logs.

AWS References:

Amazon QLDB

How QLDB Works

For improving availability and performance of the hybrid application, the following solutions are optimal:

AWS Global Accelerator (Option A): Global Accelerator provides high availability and improves performance by using the AWS global network to route user traffic to the nearest healthy endpoint (across AWS Regions). By adding the Network Load Balancers as endpoints, Global Accelerator ensures that traffic is routed efficiently to the closest endpoint, improving both availability and performance.

Network Load Balancer (Option D): Thestateful TCP-based workloadhosted on Amazon EC2 instances and thestateless UDP-based workloadhosted on-premises are best served by Network Load Balancers (NLBs). NLBs are designed to handle TCP and UDP traffic with ultra-low latency and can route traffic to both EC2 and on-premises endpoints.

Option B (CloudFront and Route 53): CloudFront is better suited for HTTP/HTTPS workloads, not for TCP/UDP-based applications.

Option C (ALB): Application Load Balancers do not support the stateless UDP-based workload, making NLBs the better choice for both TCP and UDP.

AWS References:

AWS Global Accelerator

Network Load Balancer

The company needs a cloud-based storage solution for frequently accessed data with low latency, while retaining their current on-premises infrastructure for some data storage. AWS Storage Gateway'sVolume Gateway with cached volumesis the most appropriate solution for this scenario.

AWS Storage Gateway - Volume Gateway (Cached Volumes):

Volume Gateway with cached volumesallows you to store frequently accessed data in the AWS Cloud while keeping the most recently accessed data cached locally on-premises. This ensures low-latency access to active data while providing scalability for the rest of the data in the cloud.

The cached volume option stores the primary data in Amazon S3 but caches frequently accessed data locally, ensuring fast access. This configuration is well-suited for applications that require fast access to frequently used data but can tolerate cloud-based storage for the rest.

Since the company is facing limited on-premises storage, cached volumes provide an ideal solution, as they reduce the need for additional on-premises storage infrastructure.

Why Not the Other Options?:

Option A (S3 File Gateway): S3 File Gateway provides a file-based interface (SMB/NFS) for storing data directly in S3. While it is great for file storage, the company’s need for block-level storage with iSCSI targets makes Volume Gateway a better fit.

Option C (Volume Gateway - Stored Volumes): Stored volumes keep all the data on-premises and asynchronously back up to AWS. This would not address the company's storage limitations since they would still need substantial on-premises storage.

Option D (Tape Gateway): Tape Gateway is designed for archiving and backup, not for frequently accessed low-latency data.

AWS References:

AWS Storage Gateway - Volume Gateway

To analyze the performance of the web application with granularity of no more than 2 minutes, enablingdetailed monitoringon EC2 instances is the best solution. By default, CloudWatch provides metrics at a 5-minute interval. Enabling detailed monitoring allows you to collect metrics at 1-minute intervals, which will give you the level of granularity you need to analyze performance during peak traffic.

Amazon CloudWatch metrics can then be used to analyze CPU utilization, memory usage, disk I/O, and network throughput, among other performance-related metrics, at the desired granularity.

Option A: Sending CloudWatch logs to Redshift for analysis is unnecessary and overcomplicated for simple performance analysis, which can be done using CloudWatch metrics alone.

Option C: Fetching EC2 logs via Lambda adds complexity, and CloudWatch metrics already provide the required data for performance analysis.

Option D: Sending logs to S3 and using Redshift for analysis is also more complex than necessary for simple performance monitoring.

AWS References:

Monitoring Amazon EC2 with CloudWatch

Amazon CloudWatch Detailed Monitoring

Given the large size (180 TB) of the database and the time constraint,AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimizedis the best solution. Snowball Edge allows for the physical transfer of large datasets to AWS efficiently without relying on slow internet connections.AWS DMSandSCTcan be used to perform ongoing replication of any changes made during the migration, ensuring minimal downtime.

Option B (VPN): Using a 100 Mbps internet connection would take far too long to transfer 180 TB.

Option C (Direct Connect): Establishing a 10 Gbps Direct Connect link might not be feasible within the 2-week timeframe.

Option D (DataSync over internet): With the existing internet connection, DataSync would also take too long.

AWS References:

AWS Snowball Edge

AWS DMS

This solution usesCloudFrontto serve the website securely over HTTPS usingAWS Certificate Manager (ACM)for SSL certificates.Origin Access Control (OAC)ensures that only CloudFront can access the S3 bucket directly.AWS WAFwith an IP set rule restricts access to the website, allowing only the on-premises IP address.Route 53is used to create an alias record pointing to the CloudFront distribution. This setup ensures secure, private access to the website with low administrative overhead.

Option A and B: S3 bucket policies and access points do not provide HTTPS support, nor do they offer the same level of security as CloudFront with WAF.

Option D: Signed URLs are more suitable for temporary, expiring access rather than a permanent solution for on-premises employees.

AWS References:

Amazon CloudFront with Origin Access Control

Option Aintroduces complexity and does not scale well.

Option Bcreates a read replica, offloading read traffic from the primary RDS instance without impacting the critical application.

Option Cis manual and inefficient.

Option Dmight help for caching frequently queried data but is not ideal for ad-hoc reporting.Therefore, Option B is the best choice.

This solution meets the requirements of providing encryption at both the network and session layers while also allowing for controlled access between on-premises systems and AWS resources.

AWS Site-to-Site VPN: This service allows you to establish a secure and encrypted connection between your on-premises network and AWS VPC over the internet or via AWS Direct Connect. The VPN encrypts data at the network layer (IPsec) as it travels between the corporate network and AWS.

Routing and Security Controls: By configuring route table entries, you can ensure that only the traffic intended for AWS resources is directed to the VPC. Additionally, by setting up security groups and network ACLs, you can further restrict and control which traffic is allowed to communicate with the instances within your VPC. This approach provides the necessary security to prevent unrestricted access, aligning with the company’s security policies.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (AWS Direct Connect): While Direct Connect provides a private connection, it does not inherently provide encryption. Additional steps would be required to encrypt traffic, and it doesn’t address the session layer encryption.

Option B (IAM policies for Console access): This option does not meet the requirement for network-level encryption and security between the corporate network and the VPC.

Option D (AWS Transit Gateway): Although Transit Gateway can help in managing multiple connections, it doesn’t directly provide encryption at the network layer. You would still need to configure a VPN or use other methods for encryption.

AWS References:

AWS Site-to-Site VPN- Overview of AWS Site-to-Site VPN capabilities, including encryption.

Security Groups and Network ACLs- Information on configuring security groups and network ACLs to control traffic.

SSE-KMS: Server-side encryption with AWS Key Management Service (SSE-KMS) provides robust encryption of data at rest, integrated with AWS KMS for key management and auditing.

Automatic Key Rotation: By enabling automatic rotation for the KMS keys, the system ensures that keys are rotated annually without manual intervention, meeting compliance requirements.

Logging and Auditing: AWS KMS automatically logs all key usage and management actions in AWS CloudTrail, providing the necessary audit logs.

Implementation:

Create a KMS key with automatic rotation enabled.

Configure the S3 bucket to use SSE-KMS with the created KMS key.

Ensure CloudTrail is enabled for logging KMS key usage.

Operational Efficiency: This solution provides encryption, automatic key management, and auditing in a seamless, fully managed way, reducing operational overhead.

Amazon API Gateway supportsresource policies, which allow you to control access to your API by specifying the IP addresses or ranges that can access the API. By creating a resource policythat explicitly denies access to any IP address outside the allowed set, you can ensure that only trusted IP addresses (such as those from your internal network) can access the critical information in your API. This approach provides fine-grained access control without the need for additional infrastructure or complex configurations.

Option A (Private integration): API Gateway private integrations are for creating private APIs that are only accessible within a VPC, but this solution is about restricting access to certain IP addresses.

Option C (Private subnet and ACLs): Deploying the API in a private subnet and using network ACLs adds unnecessary complexity and isn't the best fit for HTTP APIs.

Option D (Security group): API Gateway doesn't have a security group because it isn't a resource inside a VPC. Instead, resource policies are the correct mechanism for controlling IP-based access.

AWS References:

Controlling Access to API Gateway with Resource Policies

This solution meets the company's requirements with minimal administrative overhead and ensures security and ease of management.

AWS AppConfig: AWS AppConfig is a service designed to manage application configuration in a secure and validated way. It allows you to deploy configurations safely and quickly without affecting the application's performance or availability.

AWS Secrets Manager: AWS Secrets Manager is specifically designed to manage, retrieve, and rotate credentials for databases and other services. It integrates seamlessly with AWS services like Amazon RDS, making it an ideal solution for securely storing and retrieving database credentials. Secrets Manager also provides automatic rotation of credentials, reducing the operational burden.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option B (AWS Lambda + Parameter Store): While AWS Lambda can be used for managing configurations and AWS Systems Manager Parameter Store can store credentials, this approach involves more manual setup and does not offer the same level of integrated management and security as AppConfig and Secrets Manager.

Option C (Encrypted S3 Configuration File): Storing configuration and credentials in S3 files involves more manual management and security considerations, increasing the administrative overhead.

Option D (AppConfig + RDS for credentials): RDS is not designed for storing application credentials; it's better suited for managing database instances and their configurations.

AWS References:

AWS AppConfig- Describes how to use AWS AppConfig for managing application configurations.

AWS Secrets Manager- Provides details on securely storing and retrieving credentials using AWS Secrets Manager.

The combination of these solutions provides an efficient and automated way to migrate data while preserving metadata and ensuring cleanup:

Create a new S3 bucket with versioning enabled(Option A) to preserve object metadata like version IDs during migration.

UseS3 batch operations(Option B) to efficiently copy data from specific prefixes in the source bucket to the destination bucket, ensuring minimal overhead.

Use an S3 Lifecycle policy(Option F) to automatically delete the data from the source bucket after it has been migrated, reducing manual intervention.

Option C (CopyObject API): This approach would require more manual scripting and effort.

Option D (Same-Region Replication): SRR is designed for ongoing replication, not for one-time migrations.

Option E (DataSync): DataSync adds more complexity than necessary for this task.

AWS References:

S3 Batch Operations

S3 Lifecycle Policies

AWS Service Catalogallows organizations to centrally manage commonly deployed IT services and offers self-service deployment capabilities to customers. By creatingService Catalog products, the consulting company can package their solutions and tools for easy reuse by customers while maintaining central control over configuration and access. This provides a standardized and automated solution with the least operational overhead for managing and deploying solutions across different customers.

Option A (CloudFormation): CloudFormation templates are useful but don't provide the same level of management and user-friendly self-service capabilities as Service Catalog.

Option C (Systems Manager): Systems Manager is more focused on managing infrastructure and doesn't offer the same self-service capabilities.

Option D (AWS Config): AWS Config is used for tracking resource configurations, not for deploying solutions.

AWS References:

AWS Service Catalog

To address the high CPU utilization on the EC2 instance and the degraded performance of Amazon RDS for read requests, the solution involves two key actions: resizing the EC2 instance and leveraging Amazon RDS read replicas.

Resizing the EC2 Instance: The first step is to resize the EC2 instance to a type with more CPU capacity to handle the higher computational demands during peak usage times. This helps to alleviate the immediate pressure on the CPU.

Auto Scaling Group with a Size of 1: Although the application can only run on a single EC2 instance due to its monolithic nature, creating an Auto Scaling group with a minimum and maximum size of 1 ensures that the instance is automatically restarted or replaced in case of failure, maintaining high availability.

RDS Read Replica: Configuring an RDS read replica allows the application to offload read requests to a separate instance, thus reducing the load on the primary RDS instance. This improves the performance of read operations, which were previously bottlenecked due to the high CPU usage on the EC2 instance.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option B: Redirecting all traffic to the RDS read replica is not recommended because replicas are meant for read traffic only, not for write operations. This could lead to data consistency issues.

Option C: Increasing the RDS instance type capacity helps, but it doesn’t address the high CPU usage on the EC2 instance, nor does it provide a solution for scaling reads.

Option D: While resizing both the EC2 and RDS instances increases their capacities, it doesn’t address the specific need to offload read traffic from the primary RDS instance.

AWS References:

Amazon RDS Read Replicas- Explains how to create and use read replicas to offload read traffic from the primary database instance.

Resizing Your EC2 Instance- Guidance on resizing EC2 instances to meet workload demands.

AWS Application Migration Service (AWS MGN) is the recommended tool for a lift-and-shift strategy, especially for time-sensitive migrations. It automates the replication of on-premises VMs to AWS, minimizing the effort required for migration and testing.

Key steps:

Replication with AWS MGN: The AWS Replication Agent is installed on the VMs to continuously replicate data to AWS, allowing you to manage migration easily.

Testing and Cutover: Initial replication allows for testing in AWS before performing the final cutover, ensuring that the migration process is smooth and data integrity is maintained.

AWS Documentation: AWS MGN is recommended for migrating virtual machines to the cloud with minimal downtime and disruption​​.

This solution allows for secure and least-privilege access with minimal operational overhead.

IAM Identity Center: AWS IAM Identity Center (formerly AWS SSO) enables you to centrally manage access to multiple AWS accounts and applications. By using IAM Identity Center, you can assign permission sets that define what users or groups can access, ensuring that only necessary permissions are granted.

Permission Sets: Permission sets in IAM Identity Center allow you to define granular access controls for specific services, such as Amazon RDS and S3. You can tailor these permissions to meet the needs of different teams, adhering to the principle of least privilege.

Group Management: By assigning users to groups and associating those groups with specific permission sets, you reduce the complexity and overhead of managing individual IAM roles and policies. This method also simplifies compliance and audit processes.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (IAM roles): While IAM roles can provide least-privilege access, managing multiple roles and policies across teams increases operational overhead compared to using IAM Identity Center.

Option C (Individual IAM users): Managing individual IAM users and roles can be cumbersome and does not scale well compared to group-based management in IAM Identity Center.

Option D (AWS Organizations with cross-account roles): Creating separate accounts and cross-account roles adds unnecessary complexity and overhead for this use case, where IAM Identity Center provides a more straightforward solution.

AWS References:

AWS IAM Identity Center- Overview and best practices for using IAM Identity Center.

Managing Access Permissions Using IAM Identity Center- Guide on creating and managing permission sets for secure access.

This solution addresses the scalability needs of the workload while preventing failed processing attempts due to resource constraints.

Amazon S3 event notificationscan be used to trigger a message to an SQS queue whenever a new video is uploaded.

The existing Auto Scaling group of EC2 instances can poll the SQS queue, ensuring that the EC2 instances only process videos when there is a job in the queue.

SQS decouplesthe video upload and processing steps, allowing the system to handle sudden spikes in video uploads without overloading EC2 instances.

The use ofAuto Scalingensures that the EC2 instances can scale in or out based on the demand, maintaining cost efficiency while avoiding processing failures due to insufficient resources.

AWS References:

S3 Event Notificationsdetails how to configure notifications for S3 events.

Amazon SQSis a fully managed message queuing service that decouples components of the system.

Auto Scaling EC2explains how to manage automatic scaling of EC2 instances based on demand.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. AWS Lambda functions: While Lambda can handle some workloads, video processing is often resource-intensive and long-running, making EC2 a more suitable solution.

B. Using SNS with Lambda: Similar to A, Lambda is not ideal for large-scale video processing due to its time and memory limitations.

D. AWS Step Functions: While a valid orchestration solution, this introduces more complexity and overhead compared to the simpler SQS-based solution.

The most cost-effective and scalable solution for generating thumbnails when photos are uploaded to an S3 bucket is to useS3 event notificationsto trigger anAWS Lambda function. This approach avoids the need for a long-running EC2 instance or EMR cluster, making it highly cost-effective because Lambda only charges for the time it takes to process each event.

S3 Event Notifications: Automatically triggers the Lambda function when a new photo is uploaded to the S3 bucket.

AWS Lambda: A serverless compute service that scales automatically and only charges for execution time, which makes it the most economical choice when dealing with periodic events like photo uploads.

The Lambda function can generate the thumbnail and upload it to a second S3 bucket, fulfilling the requirement efficiently.

Option AandOption B(EMR or EC2 with scheduled scripts)**: These are less cost-effective as they involve continuously running infrastructure, which incurs unnecessary costs.

Option D (S3 Storage Lens): S3 Storage Lens is a tool for storage analytics and is not designed for event-based photo processing.

AWS References:

Amazon S3 Event Notifications

AWS Lambda Pricing

This solution meets the requirement of encrypting each customer’s data separately with the least operational overhead by leveraging AWS Key Management Service (KMS).

Separate AWS KMS Keys: By creating separate KMS keys for each customer, you can ensure that each customer’s data is encrypted with a unique key. This approach satisfies the compliance requirement for separate encryption and provides fine-grained control over access to the keys.

Granular Access Control: AWS KMS allows you to define key policies and use IAM policies to grant specific permissions to the keys. This ensures that only authorized users or services can access the keys, thereby maintaining the principle of least privilege.

Logging and Monitoring: AWS KMS integrates with AWS CloudTrail, which logs all key usage and management activities. This provides an audit trail that is essential for meeting compliance requirements.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (Store keys in S3): Storing keys in S3 is not recommended because it does not provide the same level of security, access control, or integration with AWS services as KMS does.

Option B (Hardware security appliance): Deploying a hardware security appliance adds significant operational overhead and complexity, which is unnecessary given that KMS already provides a secure and centralized key management solution.

Option C (Single KMS key for all data): Using a single KMS key does not meet the requirement of encrypting each customer's data separately.

AWS References:

AWS Key Management Service (KMS)- Overview of KMS, its features, and best practices for key management.

Using AWS KMS for Multi-Tenant Applications- Guidance on how to design applications using KMS for multi-tenancy.

Amazon Timestreamis purpose-built for storing and analyzing time-series data like telemetry.

Option Aleverages Timestream, SageMaker for ML, and QuickSight for visualization, meeting all requirements with minimal complexity.

Option Binvolves more complex DynamoDB-EMR integration.

Option Cuses Neptune, which is designed for graph databases, not telemetry data.

Option Dincorrectly uses Athena for visualization instead of QuickSight.

Amazon FSx for Lustreis a high-performance, fully managed file system that is ideal for applications requiring low-latency access to shared storage, especially in use cases like gaming where high throughput and low latency are essential. It integrates easily with EC2 instances, providing fast and scalable shared storage, and supports custom protocols for specific application needs.

Option A (FSx File Gateway): FSx File Gateway is designed for hybrid cloud storage and is not suited for high-performance gaming workloads.

Option B (EC2 Windows instance): Setting up a file share on a Windows instance would introduce additional administrative overhead and would not provide the necessary performance.

Option C (EFS with Lustre): While Lustre is integrated with FSx, EFS does not natively support Lustre.

AWS References:

Amazon FSx for Lustre

This solution is the most cost-effective and scalable for analyzing large amounts of web traffic logs.

Amazon S3: Storing the logs in Amazon S3 is highly scalable, durable, and cost-effective. S3 is designed to handle large-scale data storage, which is ideal for storing tens of gigabytes of log data generated daily by multiple websites.

Amazon Athena: Athena is a serverless, interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in S3 using standard SQL. It works directly with the data stored in S3, so there’s no need to load the data into a database, which saves on costs and reduces complexity. Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned by queries, making it a cost-effective solution for on-demand analysis that only occurs once a week.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option B (Amazon RDS): Storing logs in a relational database like Amazon RDS would be more expensive due to the storage and I/O costs associated with RDS. Additionally, it would require more management overhead.

Option C (Amazon OpenSearch Service): OpenSearch is a good option for full-text search and analytics on log data, but it might be more costly and complex to manage compared to the simplicity and cost-effectiveness of Athena for periodic SQL-based queries.

Option D (Amazon EMR): While EMR can handle large-scale data processing, it involves more operational overhead and might be overkill for the type of ad-hoc, SQL-based analysis required here. Additionally, EMR costs can be higher due to the need to maintain a cluster.

AWS References:

Amazon S3- Information on how to store and manage data in Amazon S3.

Amazon Athena- Documentation on using Amazon Athena for querying data stored in S3 using SQL.

Amazon EFSwithMax I/O performance modeis designed for workloads that require high levels of parallelism, such as video processing across multiple EC2 instances. EFS provides shared file storage that can be mounted on both Windows and Linux EC2 instances, and the Max I/O mode ensures the best performance for handling large files and concurrent access across multiple instances.

Option A and B (FSx for Windows File Server): FSx for Windows File Server is optimized for Windows workloads and would not be ideal for Linux instances or high-throughput, parallel workloads.

Option D (EFS General Purpose mode): General Purpose mode offers lower latency but doesn't support the high throughput needed for large, concurrent workloads.

AWS References:

Amazon EFS Performance Modes