Complete SAA-C03 Amazon Web Services Materials

The most suitable solution for optimizing the user experience by providing the lowest latency for content uploads is to upload and store content in Amazon S3 and use S3 Transfer Acceleration for the uploads. This solution will enable the company to leverage the AWS global network and edge locations to speed up the data transfer between the users and the S3 buckets.

Amazon S3 is a storage service that provides scalable, durable, and highly available object storage for any type of data.Amazon S3 allows users to store and retrieve datafrom anywhere on the web, and offers various features such as encryption, versioning, lifecycle management, and replication1.

S3 Transfer Acceleration is a feature of Amazon S3 that helps users transfer data to and from S3 buckets more quickly. S3 Transfer Acceleration works by using optimized network paths and Amazon’s backbone network to accelerate data transfer speeds.Userscan enable S3 Transfer Acceleration for their buckets and use a distinct URL to access them, such as .s3-accelerate.amazonaws.com2.

The other options are not correct because they either do not provide the lowest latency or are not suitable for the use case. Uploading and storing content in Amazon S3 and using Amazon CloudFront for the uploads is not correct because this solution is not designed for optimizing uploads, but rather for optimizing downloads. Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) that helps users distribute their content globally with low latency and high transfer speeds.CloudFront works by caching the content at edge locations around the world, so that users can access it quickly and easily from anywhere3. Uploading content to Amazon EC2 instances in the Region that is closest to the user and copying the data to Amazon S3 is not correct because this solution adds unnecessary complexity and cost to the process. Amazon EC2 is a computing service that provides scalable and secure virtual servers in the cloud.Users can launch, stop, or terminate EC2 instances as needed, and choose from various instance types, operating systems, and configurations4. Uploading and storing content in Amazon S3 in the Region that is closest to the user and using multiple distributions of Amazon CloudFront is not correct because this solution is not cost-effective or efficient for the use case. As mentioned above, Amazon CloudFront is a CDN that helps users distribute their content globally with low latency and high transfer speeds.However, creating multiple CloudFront distributions for each Region would incur additional charges and management overhead, and would not be necessary since 90% of the content is consumed within the same Region where it is uploaded3.

To use AWS Budgets to create and manage budgets for different AWS accounts, the company needs to do the following steps:

Use AWS Budgets to create a budget for each AWS account that needs a different budget amount. The budget can be based on cost or usage metrics, and can have different time periods, filters, and thresholds. The company can set the budget amount under the Billing dashboards of the required AWS accounts1.

Create an IAM role for AWS Budgets to run budget actions with the required permissions. A budget action is a response that AWS Budgets initiates when a budget exceeds a specified threshold. The IAM role allows AWS Budgets to perform actions on behalf of the company, such as applying an IAM policy or a service control policy (SCP) to restrict the provisioning of additional resources2.

Add an alert to notify the company when each account meets its budget threshold. The alert can be sent via email or Amazon SNS. The company can also add a budget action that selects the IAM role created and the appropriate SCP to prevent provisioning of additional resources. An SCP is a type of policy that can be applied to an AWS account or an organizational unit (OU) within AWS Organizations. An SCP can limit the actions that users and roles can perform in the account or OU3.

To ensure that the shopping cart data is preserved at all times, a solutions architect should configure Amazon ElastiCache for Redis to cache catalog data from Amazon DynamoDB and shopping cart data from the user’s session. This solution has the following benefits:

It offers the lowest possible latency from the application, as ElastiCache for Redis is a blazing fast in-memory data store that provides sub-millisecond latency to power internet-scale real-time applications1.

It scales with traffic volume, as ElastiCache for Redis supports horizontal scaling by adding more nodes or shards to the cluster, and vertical scaling by changing the node type2.

It ishighly available, as ElastiCache for Redis supports replication across multiple Availability Zones and automatic failover in case of a primary node failure3.

It preserves user session data even if the user is disconnected and reconnects, as ElastiCache for Redis can store session data, such as user login information and shopping cart contents, in a persistent and durable manner using snapshots or AOF (append-only file) persistence4.

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF allows users to create rules that block, allow, or count web requests based on customizable web security rules. One of the types of rules that can be created is an IP match rule, which allows users to specify a list of IP addresses or IP address ranges that they want to allow or block. By modifying the configuration of AWS WAF to add an IP match condition to block the malicious IP address, the solution architect can prevent the attacker from accessing the website through the CloudFront distribution and the ALB.

The other options are not correct because they do not effectively block the malicious IP address from accessing the website. Modifying the network ACL on the CloudFront distribution or the EC2 instances in the target groups behind the ALB will not work because network ACLs are stateless and do not evaluate traffic at the application layer. Modifying the security groups for the EC2 instances in the target groups behind the ALB will not work because security groups are stateful and only evaluate traffic at the instance level, not at the load balancer level.