Free and Premium SAP C_S4TM_2023 Dumps Questions Answers

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, automatic carrier assignment during the tendering process depends on specific conditions being met. According to the SAP documentation:

The carrier responded after the response time had expired (A)prevents automatic assignment because the tendering process only considers responses received within the defined time window. Late responses are ignored for automatic assignment.

The program to evaluate freight quotations was NOT executed (C)means that the system did not process the carrier’s response to assign it to the freight order. The evaluation program (e.g., a background job) is required to analyze quotations and assign the carrier based on criteria like cost or priority.

The other options are incorrect:

Direct Tendering - Send Freight Order Directly (B)bypasses the quotation process and assigns the freight order directly to a carrier, so it would not prevent automatic assignment.

The tendering profile contains a subsequent step (D)affects the sequence of tendering but does not inherently prevent automatic assignment if the response is valid and evaluated.

In an SAP S/4HANA Cloud Greenfield project, maintaining a clean core focuses on ensuring the system remains standard, extensible, and efficient with high-quality data. According to the SAP documentation, key aspects for clean core data quality include:

Stability (B): Ensuring data stability prevents inconsistencies and errors, supporting a reliable and maintainable system core.

Efficiency (D): Efficient data processes reduce redundancy and improve performance, aligning with clean core principles of streamlined operations.

The other options are incorrect:

Accuracy (A)is important for data quality but is not specifically emphasized as a clean core principle, which focuses more on system stability and efficiency.

Timeliness (C)relates to data availability but is less critical for clean core data quality compared to stability and efficiency.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, a business partner with the role Driver is defined in the master data with specific attributes. According to the SAP documentation:

Non-working times and absences (C): These attributes specify the driver’s availability, including holidays, vacations, or other non-working periods, critical for planning.

Validity period (D): The validity period defines the time frame during which the driver is active in the system, ensuring assignments are time-relevant.

The other options are incorrect:

Fixed assignment to a vehicle resource (A)is optional and managed in vehicle resource master data, not a mandatory driver attribute.

Planning profile (B)is used for planning settings, not for defining driver attributes.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, a schedule defines planned transportation activities, such as regular departures. According to the SAP documentation, the following attributes can be directly defined in a schedule:

Transportation lane (C): The schedule specifies the transportation lane (route between locations) it applies to, defining the path for the scheduled transport.

Carrier (D): The carrier responsible for the transport can be defined in the schedule, ensuring the correct partner is assigned.

The other options are incorrect:

Capacity (A)is defined in vehicle resources or transportation allocations, not directly in schedules.

Downtimes (B)are managed in vehicle resources or calendars, not schedules.

In SAP Business Network for Logistics, dispute management allows carriers to interact with freight settlement documents to resolve discrepancies. According to the SAP documentation:

Upload files (A)is a supported activity, as carriers can upload documents (e.g., proof of delivery or additional evidence) to support their dispute claims.

Add a detention charge (B)is allowed, as carriers can add assessorial charges, such as detention charges, to address additional costs incurred during transportation.

The other options are incorrect:

Change the document currency (C)is not typically allowed in dispute management, as the currency is defined in the freight agreement or settlement document.

Change a charge line's calculation base (D)is managed by the shipper or system configuration, not by the carrier during dispute management.

In a shipper-to-LSP B2B scenario where both parties use SAP Transportation Management, the LSP plans and executes transportation for the shipper. According to the SAP documentation, the key documents involved are:

LSP’s forwarding quotation (A): The LSP creates a forwarding quotation to provide a price estimate to the shipper, which forms the basis for the transportation agreement.

Shipper’s freight unit (D): The shipper creates freight units based on their transportation requirements (e.g., from sales orders), which are transferred to the LSP for planning and execution.

The other options are incorrect:

LSP’s service order (B)is used for internal services, not for shipper-LSP interactions.

Shipper’s freight order (C)is created by the shipper for direct carrier execution, not in a scenario where the LSP handles planning and execution.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, when using direct shipment options to convert a freight unit to a freight order, the freight order type is determined as follows:

Based on the default freight order type (B): According to the SAP documentation, a default freight order type can be defined in the system configuration (e.g., in Customizing for the transportation planning profile or freight order type settings). This default type is used when no specific rule or condition overrides it during the conversion process.

Based on the freight order type defined in the freight unit type (C): The freight unit type, configured in Customizing, can specify a default freight order type to be used when the freight unit is converted to a freight order, ensuring consistency with the transportation requirements of the freight unit.

The other options are incorrect:

Based on the freight order type in the freight unit building rule (A): Freight unit building rules determine how freight units are created (e.g., consolidation logic) but do not directly specify the freight order type for conversion.

Based on the freight order type maintained in a condition in the planning profile (D): While conditions in the planning profile can influence planning decisions, they are not typically used to determine the freight order type during direct shipment conversion.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, incompatibilities are used to define restrictions during automatic and manual planning to prevent certain combinations of objects. According to the SAP documentation, the following incompatibility types are valid in the Automatic and Manual Planning incompatibility area:

Vehicle resource - Location (stay level) (A): This incompatibility type restricts a vehicle resource from staying at a specific location (e.g., due to regulatory or operational constraints).

Freight unit - Freight booking (C): This type prevents specific freight units from being assigned to certain freight bookings (e.g., for ocean or air transport) due to incompatibilities like cargo type or equipment restrictions.

The other options are incorrect:

Transportation request header - Transportation request header (B)is not a standard incompatibility type for planning; it is more relevant to freight unit building or other processes.

Carrier - Transportation order (D)is used in carrier selection or tendering, not in the Automatic and Manual Planning incompatibility area.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, track and trace functionality is supported by documents that represent the transportation process and contain relevant tracking information. According to the SAP documentation:

Freight order (A)is a key document used for road or rail transport, containing details about the transportation process, including stages, carriers, and tracking events, making it suitable for track and trace.

Forwarding order (D)is used in logistics service provider scenarios and represents the customer’s transportation requirements, including tracking information across multiple stages.

The other options are incorrect:

Resource (B)refers to vehicles, drivers, or other assets used in transportation, not a document for tracking goods.

Service order (C)is used for internal service-related activities and does not support track and trace functionality for goods transportation.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, the Package Builder is used to estimate freight volume by assigning package types to goods for more accurate capacity planning. According to the SAP documentation, the package type assignment can be based on:

Business partner (B): Package types can be assigned based on the business partner (e.g., shipper or consignee), as different partners may have specific packaging requirements.

Shipping location (D): The location from which goods are shipped (e.g., warehouse or plant) can influence package type assignments, as different locations may use distinct packaging standards.

The other options are incorrect:

Handling unit type (A)is managed in SAP Extended Warehouse Management (EWM) or during execution, not directly in the Package Builder for planning purposes.

Shipping type (C)refers to the mode of transport (e.g., road, rail) but is not a criterion for package type assignment in the Package Builder.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, forwarding orders in LSP scenarios contain item hierarchies with categories like passive vehicle, package, service, and product. According to the SAP documentation, theservice (C)item category is not considered in subsequent execution documents (e.g., freight orders or freight bookings). Service items represent non-physical services (e.g., customs clearance) and are used for costing or documentation in the forwarding order but are not relevant to execution documents, which focus on physical goods and equipment.

The other options are incorrect:

Passive vehicle (A)represents equipment like trailers and is included in execution documents for transport planning.

Package (B)represents packaging units and is considered in execution documents for load planning.

Product (D)represents the goods being transported and is critical in execution documents.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, the number of columns displayed in a forwarding order worklist can be customized by defining anew page layout (B). According to the SAP documentation, the page layout in SAP Fiori or the transportation cockpit allows users to configure which columns are displayed in worklists, tailoring the interface to show only relevant information. This is done in the configuration settings for the worklist or cockpit interface.

The other options are incorrect:

Define a new view (A)is not a standard term in SAP TM for worklist customization; views are more relevant in other SAP modules.

Define a new query (C)is used for data retrieval but does not control column display.

Apply a filter (D)reduces the data rows displayed but does not limit the number of columns.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, theconsignment order (C)is a logical grouping document used to facilitate communication between shippers and consignees. According to the SAP documentation, consignment orders group transportation requirements (e.g., freight units) and are used to manage the interaction between the shipper (who sends the goods) and the consignee (who receives them), providing a consolidated view of the transportation process for both parties.

The other options are incorrect:

Freight order (A)is an execution document for assigning carriers and managing transport, not primarily for shipper-consignee communication.

Service order (B)is used for internal service-related activities, not for external communication.

Sales order (D)originates in sales and distribution and triggers transportation requirements but is not used for shipper-consignee communication.

In a side-by-side scenario integrating SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management with sales orders and outbound deliveries, the process is as follows:

Initially, 30 freight units are created from one sales order (1 freight unit per item).

During planning, these are assigned to 3 trucks (10 freight units per truck).

Delivery creation is triggered based on the planning result, and during packaging, up to 3 items can be packed into 1 case. Since each freight unit corresponds to one sales order item, 3 items per case means 3 freight units can be consolidated into 1 freight unit (representing the case).

With 30 freight units, consolidating 3 freight units per case results in:

30 ÷ 3 = 10 freight units (each representing one case).

Thus, the minimum number of freight units in transportation management after packaging is10. According to the SAP documentation, freight units can be consolidated during the packaging process in integration scenarios, reducing the number of freight units while maintaining the planning result (assignment to trucks).

The other options are incorrect:

A (12)andD (6)do not align with the consolidation math (30 ÷ 3 = 10).

C (3)assumes one freight unit per truck, which ignores the packaging consolidation.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, when no agreement determination condition is used, the system relies on thecarrierandpurchasing organizationto determine the correct freight agreement for charge calculation in a freight order. According to the SAP documentation, the carrier (the party providing transportation services) and the purchasing organization (the organizational unit responsible for procurement) are key involved parties in the freight agreement. The freight agreement is selected based on the carrier assigned to the freight order and the purchasing organization defined in the document, ensuring that the correct rates and conditions are applied.

The other options are incorrect:

Ordering party (B)is typically the customer or shipper requesting transportation but is not directly used to determine the freight agreement unless specified via conditions.

Executing carrier (D)is redundant with the carrier (A), as the carrier assigned to the freight order is considered the executing carrier.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, incompatibilities can be defined with different system reactions for automatic and manual planning to enforce restrictions, such as preventing the hazardous product POISON from being transported on a TRUCK unless authorized by user A. According to the SAP documentation:

Automatic Violation: Incompatibility Must Not Be Violated; Manual Violation: Incompatibility is Ignored (B): This setting ensures that automatic planning strictly enforces the incompatibility (no POISON on TRUCK), but user A can manually override it during planning, allowing flexibility for authorized users.

Automatic Violation: Incompatibility Must Not Be Violated; Manual Violation: Warning If Incompatibility Is Violated (C): This setting also enforces the incompatibility in automatic planning but issues a warning during manual planning, allowing user A to proceed with authorization while being alerted to the violation.

The other options are incorrect:

Ais too restrictive, as it prevents both automatic and manual violations, not allowing user A to authorize the transport.

Dis too permissive, as it ignores the incompatibility in automatic planning, which violates the company policy.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, the logistics integration profile defines how stages are created based on Incoterms and Incoterm locations specified in a sales order. When the setting is "Source location to Incoterm location - type 1," the system creates stages as follows:

Anactive stage from the Incoterm location to the destination location, which is planning-relevant and managed in transportation management.

Anon-planning-relevant stage from the source location to the Incoterm location, which is created for documentation purposes but not actively planned in SAP TM.

According to the SAP documentation, this configuration reflects the Incoterm responsibility split, where the Incoterm location marks the point where responsibility shifts (e.g., from seller to buyer). Thus,two stages are created (B): one active stage for the transport leg after the Incoterm location and one non-planning-relevant stage before it.

The other options are incorrect:

AandDonly account for one stage, ignoring the additional non-planning-relevant stage.

Creverses the active and non-planning-relevant stages, which does not align with the "type 1" setting.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, carrier selection for a freight order is based on specific decision criteria defined in the system. According to the SAP documentation:

Priority from transportation lane (B): Transportation lanes define carrier priorities (e.g., ranking carriers based on preference or agreements), which are used as a criterion during carrier selection.

Priority from carrier selection settings (C): Carrier selection settings in the planning profile or SAP Fiori app allow users to define priorities for carriers, influencing the selection process.

The other options are incorrect:

Costs from charge management (A): While costs are considered, they are derived from freight agreements or rate tables, not directly from charge management during carrier selection.

Costs from shipment cost document (D): Shipment cost documents are used in SAP ERP (LE-TRA), not in SAP S/4HANA TM, where freight settlement documents are used instead.

Basic Shipping in SAP S/4HANA Supply Chain for Transportation Management provides limited transportation management functionality compared to Advanced Shipping. According to the SAP documentation, the following features are available:

Transportation execution without event management (A): Basic Shipping supports execution processes like freight order creation and carrier assignment but does not include event management capabilities.

Transportation planning based on inbound deliveries (B): Basic Shipping allows planning for inbound deliveries, enabling transportation requirements to be managed for goods receipt.

Transportation planning based on outbound deliveries (C): Basic Shipping supports planning for outbound deliveries, covering the shipping process from warehouses to customers.

The other options are incorrect:

Transportation planning based on forwarding orders (D)is part of Advanced Shipping, typically used in logistics service provider scenarios.

Transportation planning based on sales orders (E)is not directly supported in Basic Shipping, as sales orders trigger order-based transportation requirements in Advanced Shipping.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, forward and backward scheduling in the transportation cockpit is supported for thefreight order (A). According to the SAP documentation, freight orders, which represent the execution of transportation, allow planners to perform forward scheduling (calculating end dates based on start dates) and backward scheduling (calculating start dates based on required delivery dates) to optimize transport timelines. This functionality is available in the transportation cockpit to ensure alignment with transportation requirements and constraints.

The other options are incorrect:

Forwarding order (B)is used for logistics service provider scenarios and does not typically support forward and backward scheduling in the transportation cockpit.

Sales order (C)originates in sales and distribution and is not directly scheduled in the transportation cockpit.

Freight unit (D)represents goods for planning but does not support scheduling at this level.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, the load planning function optimizes the assignment of freight units to vehicles to maximize capacity utilization. According to the SAP documentation, load planning can be initiated from:

Freight order (A): Load planning can be started directly from a freight order, allowing planners to optimize the load for the specific transport assigned to a truck.

Transportation cockpit (D): The transportation cockpit provides a centralized interface for planning activities, including initiating load planning for one or more trucks.

The other options are incorrect:

Vehicle resource (B)represents the truck itself but is not a direct entry point for starting load planning.

Freight booking (C)is used for ocean or air transport and does not typically support load planning for trucks.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, adimensional weight profileis used to calculate the dimensional weight of goods, which is often used for charge calculations in scenarios where volume impacts costs (e.g., air freight). According to the SAP documentation, the dimensional weight profile is assigned to thecalculation profile, which defines the rules and settings for charge calculation, including how dimensional weight is factored into the cost. This allows the system to apply the dimensional weight logic consistently across relevant freight orders or agreements.

The other options are incorrect:

Charge type (A)defines specific charge categories (e.g., base freight, fuel surcharge) but does not directly support dimensional weight profiles.

Charges profile (B)structures the charges but is not used for dimensional weight assignments.

Calculation base (D)refers to the basis for charge calculations (e.g., weight, distance) but does not hold dimensional weight profiles.

In SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, freight settlement documents (FSDs) are created based on freight orders to settle charges with carriers. According to the SAP documentation, there isno limitto the number of FSDs that can be created from a freight order during its lifecycle, as additional FSDs can be generated for changes, such as additional charges, corrections, or disputes, provided the charge elements have non-zero values. For a freight order with two deliveries, multiple FSDs can be created to account for initial settlements, amendments, or additional charges (e.g., detention or assessorial charges) throughout the lifecycle.

The other options are incorrect:

A (3), B (1), and C (2)assume a fixed number of FSDs, which is not accurate since the system allows multiple FSDs based on changes or additional requirements.

To use destination-based distance costs when planning freight orders with the VSR (Vehicle Scheduling and Routing) optimizer in SAP S/4HANA Transportation Management, you must definecosts for distance in the transportation lane (A). According to the SAP documentation, the transportation lane contains cost-related data, such as distance-based costs, which the VSR optimizer uses to calculate the optimal plan based on the distance between source and destination locations. This ensures that the optimizer considers the cost implications of the route.

The other options are incorrect:

Planning strategy VSR_DEF (B)is a default strategy for the VSR optimizer but does not specifically address destination-based distance costs.

Costs for distance in the constraints and cost settings (C)are not a standard configuration area; costs are defined in transportation lanes or freight agreements.

A freight unit building rule that does NOT use default routes (D)affects freight unit creation, not the optimizer’s cost calculations.