Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To support the company's goals of unlocking key systems and data, quickly deploying scalable APIs, and connecting to on-premises systems, while also preparing for future migrations, the best runtime deployment option is using Runtime Fabric on self-managed Kubernetes. Here's why:

Scalability: Kubernetes is designed to scale applications easily and efficiently. By deploying Mule runtimes on a self-managed Kubernetes cluster, the company can dynamically scale its APIs based on demand, ensuring performance and reliability.

Flexibility: Running on self-managed Kubernetes allows the company to have control over the infrastructure. They can customize the environment to meet their specific needs, integrate with existing on-premises systems, and support their microservices architecture running in Docker containers.

Future-Proofing: Kubernetes supports hybrid and multi-cloud deployments, making it easier to migrate workloads between different environments as needed. This aligns with the company's goal of being able to migrate their systems as part of their strategic approach.

Efficiency: By leveraging Kubernetes, the company can automate deployment, scaling, and management of containerized applications, reducing the burden on IT and DevOps teams.

MuleSoft Documentation on Runtime Fabric:

Kubernetes Documentation:

Parallel Execution:

In a Scatter-Gather scope, all routes are executed in parallel. This allows multiple operations to be performed simultaneously, which can improve performance and efficiency when dealing with independent tasks.

Transaction Management:

When Scatter-Gather operates within a local transaction, all database operations performed in parallel routes are part of the same transaction context.

Error Handling and Rollback:

If any error occurs within any of the parallel routes inside the Scatter-Gather scope, it triggers a rollback of all the database operations performed within the transaction. This ensures data consistency and integrity.

Explanation

Before we answer this question , we need to understand what median (50th percentile) and 80th percentile means. If the 50th percentile (median) of a response time is 500ms that means that 50% of my transactions are either as fast or faster than 500ms.

If the 90th percentile of the same transaction is at 1000ms it means that 90% are as fast or faster and only 10% are slower. Now as per upstream SLA , 99th percentile is 800 ms which means 99% of the incoming requests should have response time less than or equal to 800 ms. But as per one of the backend API , their 95th percentile is 1000 ms which means that backend API will take 1000 ms or less than that for 95% of. requests. As there are three API invocation from upstream API , we can not conclude a timeout that can be set to meet the desired SLA as backend SLA's do not support it.

Let see why other answers are not correct.

1) Do not set a timeout --> This can potentially violate SLA's of upstream API

2) Set a timeout of 100 ms; ---> This will not work as backend API has 100 ms as median meaning only 50% requests will be answered in this time and we will get timeout for 50% of the requests. Important thing to note here is, All APIs need to be executed sequentially, so if you get timeout in first API, there is no use of going to second and third API. As a service provider you wouldn't want to keep 50% of your consumers dissatisfied. So not the best option to go with.

*To quote an example: Let's assume you have built an API to update customer contact details.

- First API is fetching customer number based on login credentials

- Second API is fetching Info in 1 table and returning unique key

- Third API, using unique key provided in second API as primary key, updating remaining details

* Now consider, if API times out in first API and can't fetch customer number, in this case, it's useless to call API 2 and 3 and that is why question mentions specifically that all APIs need to be executed sequentially.

3) Set a timeout of 50 ms --> Again not possible due to the same reason as above Hence correct answer is No timeout is possible to meet the upstream API's desired SLA; a different SLA must be negotiated with the first downstream API or invoke an alternative API