Salesforce MuleSoft-Integration-Architect-I Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To minimize the risk of exposing sensitive data such as credit card information while still allowing it to be converted back to its original value when necessary, tokenization is the most effective approach. Tokenization replaces sensitive data with a non-sensitive equivalent, called a token, which has no exploitable value. This method ensures that the original sensitive data is stored securely and only accessible through a secure tokenization system.

In this scenario, applying a tokenization policy at the API Gateway ensures that sensitive information is replaced with tokens before the data leaves the trusted boundary. This minimizes the risk of matching sensitive data to the original. When the original data is needed, the tokenization system can detokenize the token back to its original value securely.

References:

• MuleSoft Documentation on Tokenization

When deploying to Runtime Fabric, there are several tools available within the Anypoint Platform ecosystem that facilitate the deployment process. These include:

• AnypointCLI: This command-line interface tool provides comprehensive capabilities for deploying applications to Runtime Fabric. Using AnypointCLI, you can script and automate deployments, which is useful for integrating into CI/CD pipelines.
• Anypoint Platform REST APIs: These APIs allow for programmatic deployment and management of applications on Runtime Fabric. They provide flexibility for integrating deployment processes with other systems and tools.
• Mule Maven Plugin: This plugin can be used within a Maven project to package and deploy Mule applications to Runtime Fabric as part of a build process.

However, directly uploading a JAR file from the Runtime Manager is not a supported method for deploying to Runtime Fabric.

References:

• Anypoint CLI Documentation
• Mule Maven Plugin Documentation

Explanation

* If you need to scale a JMS provider/ message broker, - add nodes to scale it horizontally or - add memory to scale it vertically * Cons of adding another JMS provider/ message broker: - adds cost. - adds complexity to use two JMS brokers - adds Operational overhead if we use two brokers, say, ActiveMQ and IBM MQ * So Two options that mention to use two brokers are not best choice. * It's mentioned that "The Fulfillment microservice consumes Order messages, fulfills the order described therein, and then publishes an OrderFulfilled message. Each OrderFulfilled message can be consumed by any interested Mule application." - When you publish a message on a topic, it goes to all the subscribers who are interested - so zero to many subscribers will receive a copy of the message. - When you send a message on a queue, it will be received by exactly one consumer. * As we need multiple consumers to consume the message below option is not valid choice: "Order messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ exchange. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to an Anypoint MQ queue. Both microservices interact with Anypoint MQ as the message broker, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices" * Order messages are only consumed by one Mule application, the Fulfillment microservice, so we will publish it on queue and OrderFulfilled message can be consumed by any interested Mule application so it need to be published on Topic using same broker. * Correct Answer: Best choice in this scenario is: "Order messages are sent to a JMS queue. OrderFulfilled messages are sent to a JMS topic. Both microservices interact with the same JMS provider (message broker) instance, which must therefore scale to support the load of both microservices" Tried to depict scenario in diagram:

Diagram Description automatically generated