JavaScript-Developer-I Leak Questions

Evaluate each test:

A. sum3([1, ' 2 ' ])

Array length is 2 → line 4: arr[0] + arr[1] → 1 + ' 2 ' → ' 12 ' (string).

Assertion: ' 12 ' == 12 is true (type coercion). However, this “test” is not logically correct: a numeric sum function should not be expected to return ' 12 ' as a string. It passes only because of weak equality coercion, so it is not a good/valid test of correct behavior.

B. sum3([ ' hello ' , 2, 3, 4])

Length ≥ 3 → line 5: ' hello ' + 2 + 3 → ' hello2 ' + 3 → ' hello23 ' .

' hello23 ' === NaN is always false because NaN is never equal to anything, not even itself. This assertion fails and also misunderstands how NaN comparisons work.

C. sum3([-3, 2])

Length 2 → -3 + 2 = -1.

Assertion: -1 === -1 → true. This is a correct and meaningful test.

D. sum3([0])

Length 1 → returns arr[0] → 0.

Assertion: 0 === 0 → true. Also a correct and meaningful test.

Therefore, the valid and logically correct tests here are C and D.

The correct answer is A .

This object uses a getter :

get fullName() {

return this.firstName + ' ' + this.lastName;

}

A getter looks like a method when it is defined, but it is accessed like a normal property.

So the correct access syntax is:

dog.fullName

That returns:

" Beau Boo "

The important distinction is:

dog.fullName

not:

dog.fullName()

Because fullName is a getter property, not a regular function property.

Option B is incorrect because calling dog.fullName() tries to call the returned string as a function. Since " Beau Boo " is not a function, that would cause a TypeError.

Option C is incorrect because there is no get object inside dog.

Option D is incorrect because there is no function object inside dog, and getters are not accessed that way.

Therefore, the verified answer is A .

This question focuses on the typeof operator and how JavaScript represents the type of the value null.

Declaration on line 1:

let x = null;

Here:

x is explicitly assigned the value null.

In JavaScript, null is a special primitive value that represents “no value” or “empty value”.

Line 2:

console.log(typeof x);

The typeof operator returns a string indicating the type of the operand. For example:

typeof 1 returns " number "

typeof " hello " returns " string "

typeof true returns " boolean "

typeof undefined returns " undefined "

typeof {} returns " object "

typeof [] returns " object " (arrays are objects)

typeof function() {} returns " function "

For null, due to an early design decision in JavaScript, the result is:

typeof null === " object "

This is a known historical quirk of the language:

Although null is a primitive and conceptually means “no object”, typeof null returns the string " object " .

Therefore, typeof x when x is null evaluates to " object " .

So on line 2, the value printed is:

" object "

This matches option A.

The incorrect options are:

B. " undefined " : would be typeof x if x were undefined, not null.

C. " x " : typeof returns a string describing the type of the value, not the variable name.

D. " null " : although intuitive, JavaScript does not return " null " for typeof null; it returns " object " instead.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

Answer: A

JavaScript knowledge / study guide reference concepts:

typeof operator and its return values

Primitive types in JavaScript (null, undefined, number, string, boolean, symbol, bigint)

Historical behavior: typeof null returning " object "

Difference between null and undefined in JavaScript

We have a ternary:

account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString)

? /* if true */

/* if false */;

Requirement:

If the account matches the search string → show it.

If it does not match → hide it.

For display:

Show: ' block ' (or similar visible value).

Hide: ' none ' .

So we want:

account.style.display = accountName.includes(parsedSearchString)

? ' block '

' none ' ;

That corresponds to option A.

Why others are wrong:

B, C use values suitable for visibility, not display.

D ( ' none ' : ' block ' ) inverts the logic, hiding matches and showing non-matches.