CIPS L4M3 Online Access

Liquidated damages are an amount of money, agreed upon by the parties at the time of the contract signing, that establishes the damages that can be recovered in the event a party breaches the contract. The amount is supposed to reflect the best estimate of actual damages when theparties sign the contract. These usually apply to a specific type of breach, and in construction, it is frequently the failure to complete work on time.

Liquidated damages clauses are usually written as some sort of formula, for example:

Total Contract Price – [(X amount of $ per day) x (number of days late)]

Including a liquidated damages clause can provide many benefits, the most important of which ispredictability. When setting a predetermined amount of damages, it allows both parties a chance to negotiate and settle on a number they both feel is fair and reasonable.

From the owner’s perspective, this acts like a cheap form of insurance against your contractors. In the event of a breach, the owner can immediately calculate the damages without going through the trouble of proving actual damages. Proving actual damages can be a complicated, lengthy, and costly process.

From a contractor perspective, this allows them to analyze the level of risk involved, and schedule appropriately. It also allows them the opportunity to limit the damage claims of the owner.

When a buyer accepts a supplier’s standard terms and conditions, the risk is that those terms are drafted to protect the supplier, not the buyer.

Supplier terms typically limit liability, restrict warranties, and include supplier-favourable payment conditions.

Therefore, the buying organisation risks being bound by contract conditions that are favourable to the supplier (D).

Express terms are the terms of the agreement which are expressly agreed between the parties. Ideally, they will be written down in a contract between the parties but where the contract is agreed verbally, they will be the terms discussed and agreed between the parties.

Implied terms are terms implied into the contract by the courts. They are not expressly set out in the contract but are taken to be as effective as if they were and as if they had been included from day one of the contract. The express terms and any implied terms together create the legally binding obligations on the parties.

The types of express terms to be found in a contract are many and varied and will depend on the type of contract. Any term written into the contract is an express term and may refer to price, time scales, warranties and indemnities, limitations on liability, conditions precedent and so on.

An implied term is a term which the courts imply into a contract because it has not been expressly included by the parties. This may be because the parties did not consider it, did not think that any problem would arise in relation to it or simply omitted to include it.

The courts are very reluctant to imply terms into contracts and will only do so in the following circumstances:

1. terms implied under statute

2. terms implied under common law

3. terms implied because of custom or usage

4. terms implied due to previous dealings

5. terms implied ‘in fact’ or to reflect the parties’ intentions

An ITT specifies what the buyer requires — including delivery milestones, scope, and evaluation criteria.

Supplier rates and BAFOs are part of supplier responses, not ITT content.