Architect Registration Examination PDD NCARB Study Notes

With outdoor below freezing and indoor RH ~40% continuously, interior vapor will migrate outward. If a proper interior-side vapor barrier/retarder is missing, moisture moves through the wall and can condense and freeze at the cold exterior stone, forming visible ice. Insulation, air spaces, or rain screens help heat/moisture management, but the symptom (ice due to vapor diffusion) points specifically to the lack of an interior vapor barrier in a cold-climate assembly.

PDD references: Moisture control & vapor retarder strategy in cold climates; condensation diagnostics (ASHRAE Fundamentals; ARE 5.0 PDD—Envelope moisture control).

Understanding the Diagram

The detail shows a fan coil unit suspended from the structure, with:

Vibration isolators at the hanging rods to limit mechanical vibration transfer to the structure.

Flexible duct connections between the fan coil unit and the rigid ductwork.

Purpose of Flexible Duct Connections

Flexible connections in HVAC duct systems are designed to:

Prevent transmission of vibration and sound from the mechanical equipment (fan coil unit) into the rigid ductwork and building.

Compensate for small misalignments between the ductwork and equipment.

Accommodate minor thermal expansion/contraction movements.

Key Function in This Context:

Fan coil units contain fans that create vibration and noise. Without a flexible connection, this vibration would travel directly through the rigid ductwork into occupied spaces, increasing noise levels.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. To provide a field point of connection — While the flexible connector does connect ducts, its purpose is not just convenience; it is specifically for vibration/sound isolation.

B. To insulate against heat transfer — This is done with thermal duct insulation, not flexible connectors.

D. To transition from flange to desired duct size — Transitions are made using sheet metal fittings, not flexible connectors.

NCARB ARE 5.0 PDD Study Guide References:

Content Area: Integration of Building Materials & Systems — Mechanical Systems and Acoustics

Sources:

Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings (MEEB) — Vibration Control in Mechanical Systems

Architectural Graphic Standards — Flexible Duct Connections for Noise and Vibration Isolation

ASHRAE Handbook — HVAC Applications, Chapter on Sound and Vibration Control

Key Point:

Flexible connectors in ductwork break the direct mechanical path for vibration and sound, reducing noise transfer from fans to occupied areas.

Step-by-Step Reasoning

1. Mezzanine Area Limitations — IBC Section 505.2.1

From the exhibit:

The aggregate area of a mezzanine within a room shall be not greater than one-third of the floor area of that room/space.

Given:

Main floor = 9,000 SF

Maximum mezzanine size = 1/3 × 9,000 SF = 3,000 SF

2. Openness Requirements — IBC Section 505.2.3

From the exhibit:

A mezzanine must be open to the room below unless it qualifies for one of the listed exceptions.

3. Relevant Exception for Enclosed Mezzanine

Exception 1:

Mezzanines (or portions thereof) are not required to be open to the room if the occupant load of the enclosed space is not greater than 10.

Exception 3:

Mezzanines (or portions thereof) are not required to be open to the room if the aggregate floor area of the enclosed space is ≤ 10% of the mezzanine area.

However — the scenario says:

The mezzanine will have one exit (so it’s not an open floor requiring multiple exits)

The architect notes there are adequate exits on the main floor to handle additional occupant load from the mezzanine → This means it could be enclosed if allowed by exceptions.

4. Evaluate Each Option:

A. 2,500 SF open lounge for 20 people

Size < 3,000 SF → OK on area.

Open mezzanine → Complies without needing an exception.

But 20 occupants means more than 10 occupant load, so it can’t be enclosed unless open — this one is already open, so fine.

This works, but the question asks for which method should the architect design, and the key is the one-exit enclosed scenario.

B. 2,750 SF enclosed business center for 15 people

Size < 3,000 SF → OK.

It is enclosed, and occupant load is 15, which is greater than 10. That means Exception 1 doesn’t apply.

But Exception 3 says: enclosed space can be allowed if enclosed area ≤ 10% of mezzanine area. Here:

10% of 2,750 SF = 275 SF.

If the enclosed portion is the business center itself (full area enclosed), then it fails Exception 3.

Wait: This would only be code-compliant as enclosed if the occupant load is ≤ 10 (Exception 1) OR enclosed area ≤ 10% of mezzanine (Exception 3).

This option might work only if the mezzanine is considered enclosed but the occupant load doesn’t require multiple exits and is allowed due to adequate exit capacity on the main floor — this appears to be the intended IBC Exception 1 scenario, but since OL = 15 > 10, it technically fails Exception 1.

The problem statement says “adequate exits available on main floor to pick up additional occupant load” — which would allow designing an enclosed mezzanine as long as total egress capacity is fine.

C. 3,250 SF open dining for 30 people

Size exceeds 3,000 SF → FAILS area limitation. Not allowed.

5. Conclusion

Given the constraints:

Must fit within 1/3 floor area rule (≤ 3,000 SF)

Must work with one exit and available exit capacity on main floor

Option C fails on size

Option A is possible but doesn’t use the enclosed condition in the prompt

Option B meets area limit, occupant load works with available exit capacity, and provides an enclosed use that matches the problem’s “program requirement” scenario