MSP-Practitioner Exam Dumps : MSP Practitioner, 5th edition Exam

The Sponsoring Group, not the SRO, is accountable for confirming the Programme Mandate. The MSP Practitioner clearly states:"The Sponsoring Group is accountable for confirming the mandate,"which means the SRO oversees delivery but does not hold responsibility for initial mandate confirmation. Meanwhile, the Programme Manager has ownership of the Vision Statement and Blueprint, aligning with delivery responsibilities.

The Senior Responsible Owner (SRO) is accountable for confirming programme closure. This responsibility involves assessing whether the programme’s Business Case objectives and benefits have been satisfactorily met or if the programme is no longer viable.

The MSP Practitioner states:“SRO will confirm programme closure if business case is satisfied or unviable.”The SRO ensures that all closure criteria, including benefit realization, risk mitigation, and stakeholder expectations, are addressed before formally closing the programme.

While the Programme Manager manages the operational closure tasks and the Sponsoring Group provides governance oversight, ultimate closure accountability rests with the SRO to ensure a controlled and successful programme conclusion aligned to strategic goals.

The Business Change Manager (BCM) supports by confirming benefits status but does not hold closure authority.

This clarity in accountability prevents premature or inappropriate programme termination and ensures a thorough and accountable close-out process.

Among the options, "Remaining aligned with corporate strategy" is identified as a core MSP programme management principle. The principles underpin the mindset and behaviors needed for successful programmes. Other options, like Quality and assurance management and Leadership and stakeholder management, fall under governance themes or transformational flow rather than principles.