AICP Exam Dumps : American Institute of Certified Planners Exam

InDolan v. City of Tigard(1994), the Supreme Court ruled that exactions (e.g., requiring land dedication for a bike path as a condition of development approval) must have a “rough proportionality” between the government’s demand and the development’s impact, building on the “nexus” test fromNollan v. California Coastal Commission(1987). Option A (rough proportionality) is correct. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under“Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “Dolan v. City of Tigardestablished the ‘rough proportionality’ test for exactions, ensuring they are proportional to the development’s impact.” Option B (cannot use public domain) is incorrect, as the case focused on exactions, not public domain. Option C (state-approved comprehensive plan) is unrelated. Option D (allowable use cannot be denied) misrepresents the ruling, which dealt with conditions, not outright denial. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Dolanintroduced the rough proportionality requirement for exactions,” supporting option A.

Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is a funding mechanism where the projected increase in property tax revenue generated by a development is used to finance public improvements in the designated area, such as infrastructure or redevelopment projects. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan Implementation,” defines TIF as “a method to fund public improvements by capturing the incremental tax revenue increase resulting from development within a defined district.” Option A (Impact Fee) is a one-time fee on developers to offset infrastructure costs, not based on future tax increases. Option B (Tax Abatement Program) reduces taxes to attract development, not to fund improvements. Option C (Tax Exemption Strategy) similarly involves tax relief, not revenue capture. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “TIF uses the projected increase in tax revenue from a development to finance public improvements in the area,” supporting option D.

In the early stages of presenting a development project, the focus should be on introducing the project’s purpose and gathering public input, not on detailed design elements. Option B (displaying a scale model) is least appropriate, as it presents a specific design solution before the public has had a chance to provide input, potentially alienating stakeholders. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Communication and Interaction,” advises that “early public engagement should focus on project goals, needs, and community input, avoiding detailed designs like models that may preempt feedback.” Options A (describing objectives), C (needs assessment), and D (comparing alternatives) are appropriate early steps to inform and engage the public. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “In early stages, avoid presenting specific designs like scale models, as they may limit public input—focus on objectives and needs instead,” supporting option B.