AICP Exam Dumps : American Institute of Certified Planners Exam

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) is a voluntary, market-driven tool that allows landowners in “sending areas” (where preservation is desired, e.g., farmland) to sell development rights to developers in “receiving areas” (where higher density is allowed), promoting preservation while directing growth. Option B accurately describes this mechanism. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” defines TDR as “a voluntary program that transfers development rights from sending areas to receiving areas to encourage preservation and manage growth.” Option A incorrectly states that development is eliminated in sending areas—TDR preserves, not eliminates, development potential. Option C is too narrow, focusing only on limiting growth without mentioning the transfer mechanism. Option D (federal mandate with compensation) is incorrect, as TDR is typically local or state-driven and voluntary. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “TDR is a market-driven tool allowing higher density in receiving areas in exchange for preservation in sending areas,” supporting option B.

A green portfolio in a revolving loan fund supports businesses with environmentally sustainable practices. Option I (bicycle manufacturer) promotes sustainable transportation, reducing emissions. Option II (compost bin distributor) supports waste reduction and sustainability. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” states, “Green portfolio funds typically support businesses like bicycle manufacturers and compost distributors, which align with environmental sustainability goals.” Option III (affordable housing builder) focuses on social equity, not necessarily green practices unless specified. Option IV (computer manufacturer) is not inherently green without specific sustainability practices. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Green portfolio loans are available to businesses like bicycle manufacturers and compost distributors for their environmental benefits,” supporting option A (I and II).

Regional governance systems that bridge city-suburb boundaries manage shared resources like transit and housing. Minneapolis/St. Paul (I) has the Metropolitan Council, established in 1967, which oversees transit, wastewater, and housing across the Twin Cities region. Portland (III) has Metro, a directly elected regional government since 1979, managing urban growth boundaries, transit, and parks. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” identifies “Minneapolis/St. Paul’s Metropolitan Council and Portland’s Metro as leading examples of regional governance systems managing city-suburb issues.” Orlando (II) and Phoenix (IV) lack similar comprehensive regional bodies—Orlando has some transit coordination, and Phoenix has the Maricopa Association of Governments, but neither has the broad authority of Metro or the Metropolitan Council. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Minneapolis/St. Paul and Portland have formal regional governance systems bridging city-suburb boundaries,” supporting option B (I and III).