AICP Exam Dumps : American Institute of Certified Planners Exam

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) is a voluntary, market-driven tool that allows landowners in “sending areas” (where preservation is desired, e.g., farmland) to sell development rights to developers in “receiving areas” (where higher density is allowed), promoting preservation while directing growth. Option B accurately describes this mechanism. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” defines TDR as “a voluntary program that transfers development rights from sending areas to receiving areas to encourage preservation and manage growth.” Option A incorrectly states that development is eliminated in sending areas—TDR preserves, not eliminates, development potential. Option C is too narrow, focusing only on limiting growth without mentioning the transfer mechanism. Option D (federal mandate with compensation) is incorrect, as TDR is typically local or state-driven and voluntary. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “TDR is a market-driven tool allowing higher density in receiving areas in exchange for preservation in sending areas,” supporting option B.

Implementing a Geographic Information System (GIS) requires a clear understanding of the department’s needs to ensure the system meets specific planning goals. Option A (survey and detail the needs of the department) is the appropriate initial step, as it identifies requirements for data, functionality, and user access. The APA’s AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), under “Administration and Management,” states, “The first step in GIS implementation is to assess the department’s needs to ensure the system aligns with planning objectives.” Option B (survey other jurisdictions) is a later step for benchmarking. Option C (contact city manager) and D (budget requests) come after needs are defined. The CPC Study Manual (2024) confirms, “GIS implementation begins with a needs assessment to define the department’s requirements,” supporting option A.

Evaluating a historic preservation district focuses on preservation outcomes. Option I (increase in square footage of rehabilitated properties) measures physical preservation efforts, a direct indicator of success. Option III (increase in property values) reflects economic benefits, often tied to preservation’s impact on desirability. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam ContentOutline(2022), under “Plan Implementation,” states, “Success of historic preservation districts is often measured by the extent of rehabilitated properties and increases in property values.” Option II (low- and moderate-income housing) is unrelated to preservation goals. Option IV (traffic flow) is not a primary measure of preservation success. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Key metrics for historic preservation districts include rehabilitated square footage and property value increases,” supporting option B (I and III).