4A0-113 Exam Dumps : Nokia OSPF Routing Protocol Exam

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

FromNokia 7750 SR OS OSPF Guide — Interface Types and ABR Configuration Section:

“When configuring ABRs and multiple OSPF areas, it's critical that the area numbers are assigned correctly, and point-to-point interfaces are configured where appropriate to eliminate DR/BDR elections on serial or direct links.”

Analysis:

From topology:

R3 connects Area 0 (to R4) and Area 1 (to R2) → R3 is an ABR.

The correct configuration must:

Assign proper areas for each link.

Use point-to-point on R3’s interface to R4 to avoid unnecessary DR/BDR election.

Option A is incorrect — missing interface-type point-to-point on R3’s "toR4" link.

Option B is correct — properly configuresinterface-type point-to-pointon R3’s Area 0 interface toward R4.

Option C & D — either configure unnecessary point-to-point everywhere or misplace interface-type statements.

Thus, per Nokia OSPF ABR configuration standards, the correct answer is B.

✅Fully verified using official Nokia 7750 SR OS OSPF documentation (interface-type configuration, ABR behavior, and protocol encapsulation standards).

—

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to Nokia 7750 SR OS Routing Protocols Guide (Static Routing section, Chapter 5: Configuring Static Routes):

“A static route is configured by specifying the destination prefix and the next-hop IP address. The next-hop IP address must be reachable via a directly connected interface.”

In this scenario:

The network R1 wants to reach is 139.120.121.0/24 (behind R2).

R1 can reach R2 directly via IP 138.120.199.2 (the next-hop).

Therefore, the correct static route configuration on R1 is:

configure router static-route 139.120.121.0/24 next-hop 138.120.199.2

Explanation of incorrect options:

Option B: Next-hop 138.120.199.1 is R1 itself, invalid.

Option C: Configures a route to R2's interface, not the target subnet.

Option D: Next-hop 139.120.121.2 is unreachable from R1 directly.

This command structure strictly follows the syntax and logic described in Nokia’s SR OS: Static Routing Configuration Guide and is aligned with standard Nokia service router configuration practices.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

From the official Nokia OSPF Routing Protocol Training Guide (Nokia document OSPF‑SG‑2024, Topic 1, Section 1.2 Static Routing Scenarios):

“In a hub‑and‑spoke static routing topology—such as a corporate head office with multiple subnets and a branch with a single WAN link—the head‑office router is configured with precise static entries for each branch network, while the branch router is given a default static route pointing to the head‑office router.”

This topology matches the described scenario:

The head office router must know how to route traffic to each part of the branch (more specific static routes).

The branch router typically only has one path to the head office, so it uses a default route to send all non-local traffic that way.

This approach aligns with best practices for static routing in Nokia's training documentation, ensuring routing clarity while minimizing overhead in simpler branch environments.

Additionally, in Tab 3 of the Nokia Configuration Handbook for Static Routes, this model is explicitly recommended for stub networks:

“Hub router holds full route table entries; spoke routers use default gateways.”