312-85 Exam Dumps : Certified Threat Intelligence Analyst (CTIA)

Game theory is a mathematical framework designed for understanding strategic situations where individuals' or groups' outcomes depend on their choices and the choices of others. In the context of threat intelligence analysis, game theory can be used as a de-biasing strategy to help understand and predict the actions of adversaries and defenders. By considering the various strategies and potential outcomes in a 'game' where each player's payoff is affected by the actions of others, analysts can overcome their biases and evaluate hypotheses more objectively. This approach is particularly useful in scenarios involving multiple actors with different goals and incomplete information.

The "known unknowns" stage in cyber-threat intelligence refers to the phase where an analyst has identified threats but the specific details, implications, or full nature of these threats are not yet fully understood. Michael, in this scenario, has obtained information on threats and is in the process of analyzing this information to understand the nature of the threats better. This stage involves analyzing the known data to uncover additional insights and fill in the gaps in understanding, thereby transitioning the "unknowns" into "knowns." This phase is critical in threat intelligence as it helps in developing actionable intelligence by deepening the understanding of the threats faced.

In the Threat Hunting Maturity Model (HMM), Level 2: Procedural represents an organization that has developed a structured but partially manual threat-hunting capability.

At this stage, organizations:

Use threat intelligence from open and closed sources to guide hunts.

Search for anomalies or suspicious activity across their network.

Employ open-source tools and basic scripts for analysis.

Depend on analysts following documented procedures rather than automated systems.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

Level 1: Minimal: Organization relies solely on reactive security measures and lacks dedicated hunting capabilities.

Level 3: Innovative: Introduces automation and advanced analytics to support hunts.

Level 4: Leading: Represents full maturity with proactive, automated, intelligence-driven hunting integrated across all defenses.

Conclusion:

The organization described is operating at Level 2: Procedural in the Threat Hunting Maturity Model.

Final Answer: A. Level 2: Procedural

Explanation Reference (Based on CTIA Study Concepts):

According to CTIA’s framework on “Threat Hunting Maturity Levels,” Level 2 involves intelligence-driven, manual hunting using open-source tools and structured procedures.