ECCouncil 312-85 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

In the Threat Intelligence Sharing Model, the Public Tier is used when information is of low sensitivity and can be shared widely across communities, industry groups, or the public domain.

This tier is ideal for sharing generalized threat data, advisories, or non-sensitive indicators that do not pose risks to the organization if disclosed.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

Private tier: Used for highly sensitive intelligence shared only within a small internal group or trusted partners.

Targeted tier: Shared with specific, predefined organizations or partners with a need-to-know basis.

Multitier: Involves multiple sharing levels but is not a standard individual tier type.

Conclusion:

Henry should use the Public Tier, suitable for broader sharing of low-sensitivity information.

Final Answer: B. Public tier

Explanation Reference (Based on CTIA Study Concepts):

As per CTIA’s “Threat Intelligence Sharing Framework,” the public tier enables dissemination of low-sensitivity threat intelligence to trusted communities for collaborative defense.

The correct sequence for scheduling a threat intelligence program involves starting with the foundational steps of defining the project scope and objectives, followed by detailed planning and scheduling of tasks. The sequence starts with reviewing the project charter (1) to understand the project's scope, objectives, and constraints. Next, building a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) (9) helps in organizing the team's work into manageable sections. Identifying all deliverables (2) clarifies the project's outcomes. Defining all activities (8) involves listing the tasks required to produce the deliverables. Identifying the sequence of activities (3) and estimating resources (7) and task dependencies (4) sets the groundwork for scheduling. Estimating the duration of each activity (6) is critical before developing the final schedule (5), which combines all these elements into a comprehensive plan. This approach ensures a structured and methodical progression from project initiation to execution.

Passive DNS monitoring involves collecting data about DNS queries and responses without actively querying DNS servers, thereby not altering or interfering with DNS traffic. This technique allows analysts to track changes in DNS records and observe patterns that may indicate malicious activity. In the scenario described, Enrique is employing passive DNS monitoring by using a recursive DNS server to log the responses received from name servers, storing these logs in a central database for analysis. This approach is effective for identifying malicious domains, mapping malware campaigns, and understanding threat actors' infrastructure without alerting them to the fact that they are being monitored. This method is distinct from active techniques such as DNS interrogation or zone transfers, which involve sending queries to DNS servers, and dynamic DNS, which refers to the automatic updating of DNS records.