ECCouncil 312-38 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 In the context of incident response methodology, the last step is typically referred to as ‘Post-Incident Activity’ or ‘Lessons Learned’. This step involves reviewing the incident to understand what happened, how it was handled, and how similar incidents can be prevented or mitigated in the future. It’s a critical phase where the organization can improve its security posture and response strategies. The follow-up step ensures that any residual risk is addressed, and that all documentation is completed. It also provides an opportunity for the incident response team to reflect on their actions and improve the incident handling plan for future responses.

References: The importance of the follow-up step as the last phase in the incident response methodology is supported by well-respected frameworks developed by NIST and SANS, which outline ‘Post-Incident Activity’ or ‘Lessons Learned’ as the final step123. These steps align with the objectives and documents of the EC-Council’s Certified Network Defender (CND) program.

 The phase of vulnerability management that deals with the actions taken for correcting the discovered vulnerability is known as Remediation. This phase involves the actual fixing or patching of the vulnerabilities to reduce the risk of exploitation. Remediation can include applying patches, making configuration changes, or implementing compensating controls. It is a critical step in the vulnerability management lifecycle, which ensures that the identified vulnerabilities are addressed to protect the network from potential attacks.

References: The concept of remediation as a phase in vulnerability management is supported by various cybersecurity frameworks and is a standard practice in the industry. It is also a part of the vulnerability management lifecycle which typically includes identifying, assessing, prioritizing, remediating, and verifying vulnerabilities1.

 In the context of cloud security, the responsibility is shared between the cloud provider and the cloud consumer. This is known as the shared responsibility model. The cloud provider is responsible for securing the infrastructure that runs all of the services offered in the cloud. On the other hand, the cloud consumer is responsible for managing the security of their data, applications, and operating systems that they run on the cloud infrastructure. The specific responsibilities can vary depending on the service model being used (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS), but the underlying principle is that both parties have a role to play in ensuring the security of cloud services.

References: The concept of shared responsibility in cloud security is widely acknowledged and documented by various cloud service providers and security organizations, including Microsoft Azure1 and the Center for Internet Security (CIS)2. These sources provide detailed explanations of the shared responsibility model and outline the security tasks handled by the cloud provider and those that fall under the cloud consumer’s purview.