IIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The Just-in-Time (JIT) method is a managerial accounting and inventory management strategy that focuses on reducing or eliminating excess inventory by receiving goods only as needed.

(A) Theory of constraints.

Incorrect: The theory of constraints focuses on identifying and managing bottlenecks in production, not reducing inventory levels.

(B) Just-in-time method. (Correct Answer)

JIT aims to reduce waste, lower storage costs, and improve efficiency by ensuring that materials and products arrive only when needed.

IIA GTAG 3 – Continuous Auditing suggests monitoring inventory controls to align with JIT principles.

(C) Activity-based costing.

Incorrect: Activity-based costing allocates costs to activities based on usage, not inventory reduction.

(D) Break-even analysis.

Incorrect: Break-even analysis calculates the level of sales needed to cover costs but does not focus on inventory management.

IIA Standard 2120 – Risk Management: Encourages auditors to assess cost-management strategies like JIT.

IIA GTAG 3 – Continuous Auditing: Supports real-time monitoring of inventory to minimize excess stock.

Analysis of Each Option:IIA References Supporting the Answer:Thus, the correct answer is (B) Just-in-Time (JIT) method, as it focuses on achieving low or no inventory to optimize efficiency and reduce costs.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

Prioritizing the restoration of business systems requires input from multiple departments because different teams depend on various systems for operations.

Option A (Backup frequency) – Typically an IT decision, with minimal department-wide input.

Option C (Assigning IT personnel) – An internal IT function.

Option D (Assessing recovery resources) – Primarily handled by IT and finance, but restoration priorities require broader input.

Since business continuity planning involves multiple stakeholders, Option B is correct.

Ineffective change management is indicated by poor impact analysis, increased production issues, and frequent emergency changes. If IT management cannot predict how changes affect interdependent systems or business processes, change risk assessment is weak. Increased trouble calls or programmer support hours suggest changes are causing defects, instability, or user disruption. Frequent emergency changes that bypass normal controls indicate inadequate planning, testing, or release management. A lack of turnover in systems support and business analyst groups is not a negative indicator; stability may actually support institutional knowledge. Internal auditors reviewing change management should evaluate authorization, testing, segregation of duties, migration controls, emergency change approval, backout plans, and post-implementation review. Therefore, items 1, 2, and 4 are correct, making Option C the answer.