IIA IIA-CIA-Part1 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

In the scenario where an internal auditor assisted with management's design of controls over the procurement function, the chief audit executive should plan an assurance engagement on the adequacy of the internal control system by assigning the engagement to another internal auditor on staff. This approach ensures that the evaluation of the controls is conducted with objectivity and independence, as the auditor who helped design the controls may have an inherent bias.

IIA Standards regarding objectivity and independence in assurance engagements.

To prevent situations where an internal auditor’s impartiality could be questioned, it is essential to have a process in place that requires auditors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest. This helps to identify and address any relationships or circumstances that might compromise, or appear to compromise, the auditor’s objectivity and independence. Ensuring that such disclosures are made before assignments are accepted can prevent conflicts of interest from affecting the audit process.

IIA Code of Ethics: Objectivity Principle

IIA Standard 1120: Individual Objectivity

The statement that best describes the difference between risk appetite and risk tolerance is that risk appetite refers to an organization's general level of acceptance of risk, while risk tolerance is a more specific and subordinate concept. Risk appetite is the broad-based amount of risk an organization is willing to accept in pursuit of its mission, while risk tolerance defines the acceptable level of variation that management is willing to allow for any particular risk as it pursues its objectives.

The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) - International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal AuditingQUESTION NO: 76

An internal auditor discovered fraud while performing an audit of an organization’s procurement process. Which of the following describes the greatest benefit of using forensic auditing techniques in this scenario?

A. Enhanced capability to prevent frauds from occurring.

B. Greater assurance that procurement frauds will be detected in a timely manner

C. Improved capability of evaluating fraud risks within the organization.

D. Greater understanding of fraud through better evidence collection

Answer: D

The greatest benefit of using forensic auditing techniques when fraud is discovered in an organization's procurement process is achieving a greater understanding of fraud through better evidence collection. Forensic auditing techniques are specialized procedures designed to collect, analyze, and evaluate evidence in a way that meets the standards of a legal process, which is crucial for understanding the mechanisms of fraud and potentially pursuing legal actions.References: Forensic auditing practices and literature on fraud investigation techniques.