HP HPE7-A02 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Rogue AP Containment Methods:

HPE Aruba Networking recommends using wireless deauthentication as the preferred method for rogue AP containment.

Deauthentication sends deauth frames to clients connected to rogue APs, causing them to disconnect. This method is effective without introducing unnecessary disruptions to the wired infrastructure.

Key Points:

Wireless Deauthentication is simple, efficient, and widely supported across client devices.

Tarpit Containment is more aggressive and may cause unintentional disruptions to legitimate clients.

Wired Containment involves blocking traffic at the switch level but is complex and may impact legitimate infrastructure traffic.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correct. Wireless deauthentication is the recommended method as it targets rogue AP clients without excessive network impact.

Option B: Incorrect. Combining wireless tarpit and wired containment is overkill and not typically recommended.

Option C: Incorrect. Wireless tarpit can be effective but is generally not the first choice due to its aggressive nature.

Option D: Incorrect. Wired containment is more complex and reserved for specific use cases, not general recommendations.

To better interpret the packets shown in the Wireshark capture, you should choose to decode UDP port 5555 packets as ARUBA_ERM and set the Aruba ERM Type to 0. This configuration will allow Wireshark to properly decode and display the Aruba-specific encapsulated remote mirroring (ERM) packets, providing a clearer understanding of the traffic.

1.Decoding Protocols: Selecting the correct protocol decoding in Wireshark ensures that the captured packets are interpreted correctly, displaying the relevant information.

2.Aruba ERM: The packets in the capture are likely encapsulated remote mirroring (ERM) packets specific to Aruba, which require proper decoding settings in Wireshark.

3.Clear Interpretation: By setting the Aruba ERM Type to 0 and decoding the packets as ARUBA_ERM, you can view the encapsulated data accurately.

Installing Agents for SSE (Secure Service Edge):

Agents installed on remote users' devices allow posture checks (e.g., antivirus status, OS version) to ensure compliance.

Based on the results of the posture checks, different permissions and security policies can be applied dynamically.

This improves the security posture of remote users before granting access to resources.

Option A: Correct. Agents enable posture checks and enforce conditional access based on compliance.

Option B: Incorrect. Admins manage SSE policies centrally, not via agents.

Option C: Incorrect. Access to private servers via SSH does not require agents; it relies on policies and tunnels.

Option D: Incorrect. Local sandboxing is generally a function of endpoint protection solutions, not SSE agents.