Fortinet NSE6_FSM_AN-7.4 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The Incident Status shows " Auto Cleared " , and the Cleared Reason states: " Rule has not been triggered for 20 minutes. " This indicates that the incident was automatically cleared by the rule logic after a defined period of inactivity.

The correct answer is C because the exhibit shows the incident status as Auto Cleared and the cleared reason indicates that the rule condition was no longer being triggered. The Study Guide explains that FortiSIEM supports clear conditions and auto-clearing behavior at the rule level. It states that if a time-based clear condition is configured, FortiSIEM can auto-clear the incident after the last occurrence if the trigger condition no longer exists. It also explains pattern-based clear behavior: FortiSIEM evaluates clear-condition subpatterns and compares attributes from the clear condition with the original incident attributes. If the configured attributes match, the incident status is set to auto cleared. In the exhibit, the cleared reason says the rule has not been triggered for a defined number of minutes. That is not a manual action by the analyst and not an endpoint-generated all-clear signal. It is FortiSIEM’s rule-based clearing logic. Option B is also wrong because the exhibit shows a specific rule inactivity period, not a generic 24-hour timeout.

To detect three failed login attempts within three minutes, you must set the aggregate count to 3 in the subpattern and the time window to 180 seconds in the rule condition. This ensures the rule triggers only if three or more failed logins occur in that timeframe.

The correct answer is A because three minutes equals 180 seconds, and the aggregate threshold must be set to three matching events. The FortiSIEM Study Guide explains that rule conditions specify event attributes and thresholds that trigger the rule and create an incident. It further states that the time window defines the period within which the subpattern must match for the rule condition to be satisfied. The Study Guide’s single-subpattern rule example shows the same principle: the condition has a configured time window, and the Aggregate section uses a function such as COUNT(Matched Events) to require a minimum number of matching events. In this question, the analyst wants the rule to trigger when three failed login attempts happen within three minutes . Therefore, the rule condition time window must be 180 seconds , and the aggregate count must be 3 . A 90-second window would detect only events inside one and a half minutes, not the required three minutes. An aggregate count of 2 would trigger too early because the requirement is three failed attempts.

The correct answer is C because the rule’s Group By attributes determine how events are grouped before the aggregate condition is evaluated. The Study Guide explains that rule conditions are built from subpatterns consisting of event attribute filters and aggregation functions. It also explains that a subpattern combines filters, aggregate, and group by fields to form the rule logic. In this case, the filters may return matching events in Analytics, but the rule still may not trigger because the aggregate condition is calculated separately for each unique Group By combination. The exhibit groups by Destination IP and User while applying COUNT(Source IP) > = 2. This means FortiSIEM does not count all matching events together. Instead, it counts only events that share the same Destination IP and User combination. If no single grouped combination reaches the aggregate threshold, no incident is created. The issue is not the event lookup, not the Destination Host Name format, and not necessarily the aggregate expression itself. The grouping logic is what restricts the counted event set.