Pearson CMMC-CCP New Attempt

Per the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP), when planning an assessment, the Lead Assessor must coordinate with the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) to select interview participants who can provide clarity and understanding of their practice activities. The intent is to interview individuals directly involved with and knowledgeable about the processes and practices under review, rather than selecting personnel based solely on rank, clearance, or formal expertise in CMMC.

This ensures the assessment is evidence-based and grounded in how practices are actually performed within the OSC.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP), v1.0

The Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) enters into a contractual relationship with the OSC. As part of that contract, the C3PAO maintains a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to protect sensitive and proprietary information reviewed during the assessment.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CAP v2.0, Roles and Responsibilities (§2.8): “The C3PAO maintains a non-disclosure agreement with the OSC to protect all sensitive information disclosed during the assessment.”

Why Option B is Correct:

Only the C3PAO contracts directly with the OSC and is bound to protect assessment data.

NIST, The Cyber AB (formerly CMMC-AB), and OUSD A & S do not enter NDAs directly with OSCs.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0, Section on OSC–C3PAO agreements.

===========

Understanding SI.L2-3.14.6: Monitor Communications for Attacks

The practiceSI.L2-3.14.6fromNIST SP 800-171(aligned with CMMC Level 2) requires an organization tomonitor organizational communications for indicators of attack. This typically includes:

✅Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)andIntrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)

✅Log analysis and network monitoring

✅Incident response planningfor detected threats

As part of aCMMC Level 2 assessment, theCertified CMMC Assessor (CCA)must ensure that theOSC (Organization Seeking Certification)hasproperly implemented and documenteditsmonitoring capabilities.

Why " Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS " is Correct?

TheCCA must collect sufficient objective evidenceto determine compliance.

Reviewing anartifact(such as system configurations, IDS/IPS logs, or security policies)helps validatethat intrusion detection is properly implemented.

Configuration settings providedirect evidenceof whethermonitoring for attacksis effectively applied.

Breakdown of Answer Choices

Option

Description

Correct?

A. Conduct a penetration test

❌Incorrect–Penetration testing isnot requiredfor CMMC Level 2 assessments and falls outside an assessor ' s responsibilities.

B. Interview the intrusion detection system ' s supplier.

❌Incorrect–Thesupplier does not determine compliance; the assessor needs evidence from theOSC’s implementation.

C. Upload known malicious code and observe the system response.

❌Incorrect–This would beinvasive testing, which isnot part of a CMMC assessment.

D. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

✅Correct – Reviewing system artifacts provides direct evidence of compliance with SI.L2-3.14.6.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 Documentation

NIST SP 800-171 SI.L2-3.14.6– Requires monitoring communications for attack indicators.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– Describesartifact reviewas an essential assessment method.

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isD. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

This aligns withCMMC 2.0 Level 2 assessment requirementsandSI.L2-3.14.6 compliance verification.

The correct answer isA. CMMC Assessment Reporting Requirementsbecause this document specifically outlines thestructured processthat Certified Third-Party Assessment Organizations (C3PAOs) must follow when conducting and reporting CMMC assessments.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

Understanding the CMMC Assessment Process

TheLead Assessorbriefs the team on theassessment requirementsand theevaluation criteriabefore the assessment begins.

Throughout the assessment,findings summaries, practice ratings, and level recommendationsare documented and reported.

These findings are internally reviewed by theC3PAObefore they are formally submitted forquality review and final rating approval.

Key Document Stipulating Reporting Requirements: CMMC Assessment Reporting Requirements

This documentspecifically details how assessments must be reportedwithin theCMMC ecosystem.

It describes the structured process for assessment submission, internalC3PAO reviews, andquality checks by the CMMC-ABbefore an organization can receive a final certification decision.

It ensures thatresults are consistent, transparent, and aligned with DoD cybersecurity compliance expectations.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. DFARS 52.204-21 Assessment Reporting Requirements

This clause only specifiesbasic safeguardingof Federal Contract Information (FCI) but doesnotdictate the reporting process for CMMC assessments.

C. NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2 Assessment Reporting Requirements

WhileNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2outlines security controls, it doesnotdefine how CMMC assessments must be conducted and reported.

D. DFARS Clause 252.204-7012 Assessment Reporting Requirements

This DFARS clause focuses onincident reportingandcyber incident response requirementsbut does not detail theCMMC assessment reporting process.

Official Reference:

CMMC Assessment Reporting Requirements, issued byThe Cyber ABandDoD, governs how C3PAOs must report assessment results.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP)also outlines reporting workflows for certification.

Thus, theCMMC Assessment Reporting Requirementsdocument is the authoritative source that dictates the reporting procedures for CMMC assessments.