Pearson CMMC-CCP New Attempt

In CMMC v2.0, Level 1 is explicitly the level that “focuses on the protection of FCI ” and is composed of the basic safeguarding requirements aligned to FAR 52.204-21 . This directly establishes Level 1 as meeting the standard for protecting FCI.

However, the question asks which levels meet the standard of protecting FCI—not which level is primarily intended for FCI. The official CMMC Model Overview (Version 2.0) states that the CMMC levels and associated sets of practices are cumulative , meaning that to achieve a higher level, an organization must also demonstrate achievement of the preceding lower levels. Because Level 2 and Level 3 certifications require meeting lower-level requirements as part of achieving the higher certification, an organization certified at Level 2 or Level 3 necessarily satisfies the Level 1 requirements that protect FCI.

In addition, the later Model Overview v2.13 reiterates the structure of the model: Level 1 requirements correspond to FAR 52.204-21 safeguards (FCI), while Level 2 and Level 3 focus on CUI protection at increasing rigor. Taken together, the official documents support that Levels 1, 2, and 3 all meet the standard for protecting FCI, with Level 1 being the foundational baseline and Levels 2/3 building on it.

===========

Understanding IA.L2-3.5.3: Multifactor Authentication (MFA) Requirement

TheIA.L2-3.5.3practice, derived fromNIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.5.3), requires thatmultifactor authentication (MFA) be implemented for both privileged and standard userswhen accessing:

✔Organizational endpoints(e.g., laptops, desktops, mobile devices).

✔Network resources(e.g., VPNs, internal systems).

✔Cloud services containing Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Key Requirement for a "MET" Rating

For IA.L2-3.5.3 to beMet, the organization must:

Require MFA for all privileged users(e.g., system administrators).

Require MFA for standard users accessing endpoints and network resources.

Implement MFA across all relevant systems.

Sincestandard users do not require MFA in the OSC’s current implementation, the practiceis not fully implementedand must be ratedNOT MET.

Why is the Correct Answer "D" (Practice is NOT MET since the objective was not implemented)?

A. The process is running correctly → Incorrect

MFA isonly applied to privileged users, but it isalso required for standard users. The process isnot fully implemented.

B. It is out of scope as this is a new acquisition → Incorrect

New acquisitionsmust still meet MFA requirementsif they handle CUI or network access.

C. The new acquisition is considered Specialized Assets → Incorrect

Specialized assets (e.g., IoT, legacy systems) may have alternative security controls, but standard users and endpointsmust still comply with MFA.

D. Practice is NOT MET since the objective was not implemented → Correct

MFA must be enabled for both privileged and standard usersaccessing endpoints and network resources. Since standard users are excluded, the practice isNOT MET.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (Advanced) Requirements

Specifies thatMFA must be applied to all users accessing CUI and network resources.

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.5.3 – MFA Implementation)

Requires MFA forall user types, including privileged and standard users.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

States that a practicemust be fully implemented to be considered MET. Partial implementation meansNOT MET.

Understanding Evidence Sufficiency in CMMC Level 2 Assessments

During aCMMC Level 2 Assessment, theLead Assessormust determine whether the evidence collected for each practice issufficientto support an assessment finding. This aligns with theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, which requires assessors to evaluate:

Examinations– Reviewing documents, configurations, and system records.

Interviews– Speaking with personnel to confirm implementation and understanding.

Testing– Observing security controls in action to validate effectiveness.

To determine whether evidence issufficient, the assessor ensures that it:

Directly supports the assessment objective.

Demonstrates that the practice is consistently implemented.

Can be independently verified.

Why Option B (Sufficiency) is Correct

Sufficiencyrefers to whetherenoughevidence has been collected to make an accurate determination about compliance.

Option A (Adequacy)is incorrect because adequacy relates tothe qualityof evidence, while sufficiency focuses on whetherenoughevidence exists.

Option C (Process Mapping)is incorrect because process mapping is used for understanding workflows but is not an assessment verification method.

Option D (Assessment Scope)is incorrect because defining the scope happensbeforeevidence collection, during the planning phase.

Official CMMC Documentation References

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide – Section 3.6 (Determining Sufficiency of Evidence)

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide – Evidence Collection and Evaluation

Final Verification

Since theLead Assessor is ensuring enough evidence is available to verify compliance, the correct answer isOption B: Sufficiency.

ThePhysical Protection (PE) domaininCMMC 2.0 Level 1includes the requirementPE.L1-3.10.3, which mandates that organizationsescort visitors and monitor their activity.

Breaking Down the Scenario:

TheCMMC Assessment Teamarrives at the OSC.

Thereceptionist acknowledges their arrival but does not verify credentials or escort themto the appropriate location.

Failing to verify visitor identity and failing to escort them is a violation of PE.L1-3.10.3.

Analysis of the Given Options:

A. PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity→✅Correct

This requirement ensures that visitorsdo not have unsupervised access to sensitive areas.

The receptionistshould have checked credentials and escorted the assessment team.

B. PE.L1-3.10.5: Control and manage physical access devices→❌Incorrect

This requirement refers to managingkeys, access badges, and security devices, which isnot the issue in this scenario.

C. PS.L2-3.9.1: Screen individuals prior to authorizing access to organizational systems containing CUI→❌Incorrect

This control applies to personnel screeningsbefore granting access to CUI systems, not physical visitor access.

D. PS.L2-3.9.2: Ensure that organizational systems containing CUI are protected during and after personnel actions such as terminations and transfers→❌Incorrect

This requirement deals withoffboarding employees and ensuring they no longer have system access. It isnot relevant to visitor escorting.

Official References Supporting the Correct Answer:

CMMC 2.0 Level 1 - PE.L1-3.10.3 (Physical Protection)

Requires organizations toescort visitors and monitor visitor activityat facilities containingFCI or CUI.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2, Control 3.10.3

States thatvisitors must be escorted and monitored at all timesto prevent unauthorized access.

Conclusion:

Since the receptionist failed to verify credentials and escort the visitors, this violatesPE.L1-3.10.3.

✅Correct Answer: A. PE.L1-3.10.3: Escort visitors and monitor visitor activity