Cyber AB CMMC-CCP Questions Answers

In aCMMC Level 2 assessment, theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)is responsible for identifying theassessment scopebased on theCMMC Scoping Guidanceprovided by theCyber AB (Cyber Accreditation Body) and DoD.

The OSC must determine which assets and systems handleControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)and categorize them accordingly.

Understanding CMMC Assessment ProceduresACMMC assessment procedureconsists of:

Assessment Objective– Defines what is being evaluated and the expected outcome.

Assessment Methods– Specifies how the evaluation is conducted (e.g.,examination, interviews, testing).

Assessment Objects– Identifies what is being evaluated, such as policies, systems, or people.

Assessment Objectivesincludedetermination statementsthat describe the expected outcome for each CMMC security practice.

These statements define whether a practice has beenadequately implementedbased ondocumented evidence and assessment findings.

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) GuideandNIST SP 800-171Aspecify that each practice has a determination statement guiding assessment decisions.

A. Specifications and mechanisms→Incorrect

These belong toassessment objects, which refer to the systems, policies, and mechanisms being evaluated.

B. Examination, interviews, and testing→Incorrect

These areassessment methods, which describe how assessorsverifycompliance (e.g., through interviews or testing).

D. Exercising assessment objects under specified conditions→Incorrect

This refers toassessment testing, which is a method, not an assessment objective.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– Describes determination statements as the core of assessment objectives.

NIST SP 800-171A– Defines determination statements as a key element of evaluating security controls.

Why the Correct Answer is "C"?Why Not the Other Options?Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:Final Justification:Since anassessment objectiveincludes adetermination statementthat describes whether a practice is implemented properly, the correct answer isC.

Understanding SI.L2-3.14.6: Monitor Communications for AttacksThe practiceSI.L2-3.14.6fromNIST SP 800-171(aligned with CMMC Level 2) requires an organization tomonitor organizational communications for indicators of attack. This typically includes:

✅Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS)andIntrusion Prevention Systems (IPS)

✅Log analysis and network monitoring

✅Incident response planningfor detected threats

As part of aCMMC Level 2 assessment, theCertified CMMC Assessor (CCA)must ensure that theOSC (Organization Seeking Certification)hasproperly implemented and documenteditsmonitoring capabilities.

TheCCA must collect sufficient objective evidenceto determine compliance.

Reviewing anartifact(such as system configurations, IDS/IPS logs, or security policies)helps validatethat intrusion detection is properly implemented.

Configuration settings providedirect evidenceof whethermonitoring for attacksis effectively applied.

Why "Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS" is Correct?Breakdown of Answer ChoicesOption

Description

Correct?

A. Conduct a penetration test

❌Incorrect–Penetration testing isnot requiredfor CMMC Level 2 assessments and falls outside an assessor's responsibilities.

B. Interview the intrusion detection system's supplier.

❌Incorrect–Thesupplier does not determine compliance; the assessor needs evidence from theOSC’s implementation.

C. Upload known malicious code and observe the system response.

❌Incorrect–This would beinvasive testing, which isnot part of a CMMC assessment.

D. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

✅Correct – Reviewing system artifacts provides direct evidence of compliance with SI.L2-3.14.6.

NIST SP 800-171 SI.L2-3.14.6– Requires monitoring communications for attack indicators.

CMMC Assessment Process Guide (CAP)– Describesartifact reviewas an essential assessment method.

Official References from CMMC 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 DocumentationFinal Verification and ConclusionThe correct answer isD. Review an artifact to check key references for the configuration of the IDS or IPS practice for additional guidance on intrusion detection and prevention systems.

This aligns withCMMC 2.0 Level 2 assessment requirementsandSI.L2-3.14.6 compliance verification.

Understanding the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) PhasesTheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)consists ofthree primary phases:

Phase 1 - Planning(Pre-assessment activities)

Phase 2 - Conducting the Assessment(Evidence collection and analysis)

Phase 3 - Reporting and Finalizing Results

DuringPhase 3, the Assessment Teamreviews evidenceto confirm if anyLimited Practice Deficiency Correctionshave been successfully implemented.

Scoring Practices in Phase 3The CAP document specifies that a practice can bescored as METif:

✅The deficiency identified in Phase 2 has been fully corrected before final scoring.

✅Sufficient evidence is provided to demonstrate compliance with the CMMC requirement.

✅The correction is notmerely plannedbutfully implemented and validatedby the assessors.

Since the evidence shows thatdeficiencies have been corrected, the correct score isMET.

B. POA&M (Plan of Action & Milestones)❌Incorrect. APOA&M (Plan of Action and Milestones)is usedonly when a deficiency remains unresolved. Since the deficiency is already corrected, this option does not apply.

C. NOT MET❌Incorrect. A practice is scoredNOT METonly if the deficiency hasnotbeen corrected by the end of the assessment.

D. NOT APPLICABLE❌Incorrect. A practice is markedNOT APPLICABLE (N/A)only if it doesnot apply to the organization’s environment, which is not the case here.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document– Defines scoring criteria for MET, NOT MET, and POA&M.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option A (MET) is the correct answer, as the deficiencies have been corrected before final scoring.