Pass Using 1z0-1046-24 Exam Dumps

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, BPM Worklist manages approval workflows. When an approver (e.g., the same manager as both line and HR) appears multiple times, duplicate notifications can occur unless aggregation is configured.

Option A: Routing to other participants doesn’t address duplicate notifications for the same approver.

Option B: Correct. Setting Task Aggregation to "Once Per Task" in BPM ensures that if the same approver appears multiple times in the chain, they receive only one notification to approve the task once, fulfilling the requirement.

Option C: Immediate completion affects task closure timing, not notification frequency.

Option D: Editing future participants doesn’t control notification aggregation.

Option E: Allowing edits to future participants is unrelated to duplicate notifications.

The correct answer isB, as per "Using Global Human Resources" on BPM approval configuration.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

When configuring approval rules for the "Promote" transaction in Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the supported Approval Types are defined in the "Securing HCM" guide under "Approval Management." The correct types are: Application Role (e.g., HR Specialist), Approval Groups (predefined groups), Management Hierarchy (supervisory levels), Position Hierarchy (position-based levels), Representative (a delegate), Self Auto Approve (automatic approval for the initiator), and User (specific individual). Option B lists all these accurately. Option A includes "Data Role," which is a security concept, not an approval type. Option C uses "Parent Position" (not a standard term), and Option D includes "Enterprise Role" (not applicable here). Thus, Option B is correct.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the Person Name Format configuration within the "Manage Workforce Information" task allows customization of how names are displayed across the application. This is distinct from defining name fields or their required status, which is handled elsewhere (e.g., via flexfields or page composer).

Option A: You can configure the display format of a worker’s name (e.g., "First Last" or "Last, First") at the top of employee-level pages, such as the Employment Info page. This is a key feature of the Person Name Format task, making it correct.

Option B: The name fields shown in the Person Details section during hiring are predefinedby the system or customized via page composer/flexfields, not directly through the Person Name Format task, which focuses on display format rather than field visibility.

Option C: The format of a worker’s name in search results (e.g., Directory or Person Search) can be configured here, allowing consistency in name presentation across the application. This is a supported feature, making it correct.

Option D: Defining required name fields (e.g., First Name as mandatory) is managed through the Person Details setup or flexfield configuration, not the Person Name Format task, which is about display rather than data entry rules.

The correct answers areAandC, as confirmed in "Implementing Global Human Resources" under Workforce Information setup.

Full Detailed In-Depth Explanation:

In Oracle Global Human Resources Cloud, the "effective start date" for an employee typically refers to the start date of their person record or a specific change, depending on context. Here, the question involves a name change backdated to the marriage date, and we need the effective start date displayed as of August 15, 2015.

Option A: July 11, 2015, is the date the change was requested and processed. However, the name change was applied retroactively to the marriage date, not this transaction date.

Option B: Correct. June 12, 2015, is the marriage date, and the request was to update the last name effective from that date. In Oracle HCM, when you update a person’s name with an effective date (via Manage Person or a similar task), the system records this as the effective start date of the name change. As of August 15, 2015, the system displays the name change effective from June 12, 2015, reflecting the backdated update.

Option C: January 1, 2015, is the hire date and the initial effective start date of the person record. However, the name change overrides this for the specific attribute (last name), and the question implies the effective date tied to the update.

Option D: August 15, 2015, is the "as of" date, not an effective start date for any change or the employee’s record.

The correct answer isB, as the effective start date of the name change is June 12, 2015, per "Using Global Human Resources" on managing person data with effective dating.