AWS Certified Professional DOP-C02 Amazon Web Services Study Notes

To allow only creation/configuration of service-linked roles , you need a way to tightly scope what IAM actions the developer can perform. The most AWS-appropriate mechanism for “delegate limited IAM admin” is a role with a permissions boundary :

A permissions boundary sets the maximum permissions the role (and any roles it creates, depending on design) can ever have. This is a standard pattern to safely delegate IAM tasks without granting broad IAM administration.

You can define the role’s policy + boundary so the developer can call only the APIs required for service-linked roles (for example actions like creating service-linked roles and passing only allowed AWS service principals), while preventing general role/policy creation outside that scope.

Why the others don’t meet “service-linked roles only”:

A is vague (“common services”) and cross-account access doesn’t inherently restrict to only service-linked roles. It’s also more operational overhead than needed for a single dev account use case.

B PowerUserAccess is far too broad and does not restrict to service-linked roles.

C An SCP with Deny iam:* would block IAM entirely (including what the developer needs). Even if refined, SCPs set account-wide guardrails and are not the right tool to grant a single developer the precise ability to create only service-linked roles.

C. Create new ALB and Auto Scaling group resources in the new Region and configure the new ALB to direct traffic to the new Auto Scaling group. This will allow users in the new Region to access the application with lower latency by reducing the network hops between the user and the application servers.

D. Create Amazon Route 53 records, health checks, and latency-based routing policies to route to the ALB. This will enable Route 53 to route user traffic to the nearest healthy ALB, based on the latency between the user and the ALBs.

F. Convert the DynamoDB table to a global table. This will enable reads and writes to the table in both Regions with low latency, improving the overall response time of the application

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of DevOps Engineer documents only:

The requirement is to log and analyze Kubernetes control plane activity, including API requests, and to monitor container performance on the worker nodes with the least operational overhead.

Option B is correct because:

Amazon EKS control plane logging can send control plane logs, including API server logs, to Amazon CloudWatch.

CloudWatch Container Insights provides monitoring and performance visibility for containers, pods, nodes, and clusters.

CloudWatch Logs Insights can be used to query and analyze both control plane and node-related logs.

This is the most managed and lowest-overhead solution among the options.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. CloudTrail is not the primary solution for Kubernetes control plane logs such as API server logs, and deploying Logstash increases operational overhead significantly.

C. Sending logs to Amazon S3 and analyzing them with Athena and QuickSight is more operationally complex and less direct than using native CloudWatch integrations.

D. AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry with Firehose and Redshift adds substantial complexity and operational overhead compared to native EKS and CloudWatch capabilities.

The following are the steps that the DevOps engineer should take to reduce the latency of the Lambda function at all times of the day:

Configure provisioned concurrency on the Lambda function.

Configure AWS Application Auto Scaling on the Lambda function with provisioned concurrency values set to a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 100.

The provisioned concurrency setting ensures that there is always a minimum number of Lambda function instances available to handle requests. The Application Auto Scaling setting will automatically scale the number of Lambda function instances up or down based on the demand for the application.

This solution will ensure that the Lambda function is able to handle the increased load during the middle of the day, while also keeping the cold-start latency low.

The following are the reasons why the other options are not correct:

Option A is incorrect because it will not reduce the cold-start latency of the Lambda function.

Option B is incorrect because it will not scale the number of Lambda function instances up or down based on demand.

Option D is incorrect because it will only configure reserved concurrency on the API Gateway API, which will not affect the Lambda function.