PDPF Exam Dumps : Privacy and Data Protection Foundation

As stated in the statement, Article 9 concerns the treatment of special categories of personal data, also called sensitive data.

This is a type of question that is often asked by EXIN. Important to remember which types of data are categorized as sensitive.

Article 9: Processing of special categories of personal data

1. Processing of personal data revealing racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or trade union membership, and the processing of genetic data, biometric data for the purpose of uniquely identifying a natural person, data concerning health or data concerning a natural person’s sex life or sexual orientation shall be prohibited.

Examples of sensitive data: Race, skin color, family tree, political party, political party affiliation, religious beliefs, illness, test results, digital, facial recognition and sexual preference. These are just a few examples.

The organization minimizes the risk of costly adjustments in processes or the redesign of systems in a later stage. Incorrect. This aspect may strengthen the confidence of management, but not of customers or citizens.

The organization prevents non-compliance with the GDPR and minimizes the risk of fines. Incorrect. Preventing fines may strengthen the confidence of management, but not of customers or citizens.

The organization proves that it takes privacy seriously and aims for compliance with the GDPR. Correct. Doing a DPIA shows customers or citizens that the company is serious about data protection. (Literature: A, Chapter 8)

This is an issue that addresses two very important points – sensitive data and data from minors.

As these are, it is necessary to inform the Supervisory Authority and those responsible for the data subjects. Article 34 mentions:

1. When the personal data breach is likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons, the controller shall communicate the personal data breach to the data subject without undue delay.

Recital 38 says:

Children merit specific protection regarding their personal data, as they may be less aware of the risks, consequences and safeguards concerned and their rights in relation to the processing of personal data. Such specific protection should, in particular, apply to the use of personal data of children for the purposes of marketing or creating personality or user profiles and the collection of personal data with regard to children when using services offered directly to a child. The consent of the holder of parental responsibility should not be necessary in the context of preventive or counselling services offered directly to a child.