PC-BA-FBA-20 Exam Dumps : BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis V4.0

Critical Success Factors (CSFs) are the few areas in which an organisation must achieve consistently high performance to meet its mission and strategic goals. To monitor whether a CSF is being achieved, a BA defines quantitative measures of performance, which are known as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). KPIs are the specific, measurable metrics used to track and assess the success of an activity or the progress towards an objective. For example, if a CSF is "Excellent Customer Service," a corresponding KPI might be "Average Call Waiting Time (less than 60 seconds)"—a clear, quantitative measure. While the Balanced Business Scorecard (D) is a framework that uses CSFs and KPIs, the specific quantitative measures themselves are the KPIs. Objectives (B) are the desired outcomes, not the measure of the outcome.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Strategic Context, CSFs and KPIs)

Here are the next five questions:

The concern of consumers about unnecessary packaging is an external factor that influences the organisation. The appropriate technique for systematically analysing these external macro-environmental factors is PESTLE analysis. PESTLE stands for Political, Economic, Sociological, Technological, Legal, and Environmental factors. The increasing consumer concern about packaging falls clearly under the Sociological or Environmental categories of the PESTLE framework. This technique helps the business analyst identify trends and issues arising from outside the organisation that may create a business need or risk, which then drives strategic change. The other options are incorrect: a Power/Interest grid is for stakeholder management; Boston Box (BCG Matrix) is for product portfolio management; and a Resource Audit is for internal analysis of resources.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Strategic Analysis, External Environment Analysis)

The MoSCoW prioritization technique categorises requirements based on their importance to the current timebox or delivery. The categories are defined as follows:

MUST Have: Non-negotiable; essential for the solution to be viable. If missed, the project fails.

SHOULD Have: Important but not vital; the solution is still viable if these are deferred, but it will be a loss or require a workaround.

COULD Have: Desirable; can be deferred until the next timebox, with a minor impact on value.

WON'T Have this time (or WANT): Agreed not to be delivered now.

The description "essential but which may be deferred in the short term" aligns perfectly with SHOULD Have. This category implies high importance, but the risk of non-delivery is managed through a temporary workaround, making them the first requirements considered for deferral if the schedule is threatened.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Prioritisation Techniques, MoSCoW)

===========