Free and Premium BCS PC-BA-FBA-20 Dumps Questions Answers

The Project Sponsor is the senior executive or manager who owns the project, champions it, secures funding, and holds ultimate accountability for the benefits. While they are the most important stakeholder and sign off on the requirements, they are typically NOT an active, day-to-day working member of the project team responsible for executing the Requirements Engineering activities. The Project Manager (A), Business Analyst (C), and Software Tester (D) are all core, active members of the project team with specific roles in managing, defining, and validating the requirements, respectively.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Roles in Requirements Engineering)

The true statements about formal observation are b and d. Formal observation is when a business analyst watches an individual or group perform their work. Statement (b) is true as observing the environment directly helps the analyst understand the physical business environment and how it influences the work. Statement (d) is true because observation is particularly effective for identifying tacit knowledge (unspoken or unwritten rules, shortcuts, or skills) that the worker may take for granted or find difficult to articulate during an interview. Statement (a) is false as observation is a passive technique, not suitable for actively negotiating or resolving conflicts, which is better suited for workshops or interviews. Statement (c) is false as observation does not actively engage a wide range of stakeholders to obtain buy-in.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Investigative Techniques, Observation)

The development of a Business Case is often an iterative process. Before significant investment is made in creating the detailed Initial Business Case (often called the Outline Business Case or OBC), a preliminary assessment is required to ensure the proposed change is viable. This assessment is the Feasibility study (or Feasibility Assessment). A feasibility study quickly evaluates the proposed initiative to confirm it is technically possible, financially justifiable, and strategically aligned (Business Feasibility). The outcomes of this study determine whether it is worthwhile to proceed to the more detailed, full business case development. The other options (A, B, D) occur after the initial business case is approved and investment is committed.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Business Case Lifecycle)

Workshops are structured meetings designed to achieve specific objectives through group participation. Regardless of the workshop ' s focus, collaboration is a fundamental goal.

Key Considerations:

Collaboration: Workshops bring stakeholders together to share ideas, solve problems, and make decisions collaboratively.

Reviewing the Business Case: While reviewing the business case may be a specific objective of some workshops, it is not a universal goal.

Creating Mind Maps and Process Models: These are tools or outputs of workshops, not overarching goals.

Brainstorming Ideas: Brainstorming is a technique used in workshops but is not the ultimate goal of all workshops.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Collaboration: Collaboration is the core purpose of workshops, enabling participants to work together effectively. Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Reviewing the business case: This is a specific objective, not a universal goal of all workshops. Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Creating mind maps and process models: These are tools or outputs, not goals. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Brainstorming ideas: Brainstorming is a technique, not the overarching goal of all workshops. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The goal of all workshops is:

A. Collaboration.

A class model is used to represent business objects or data entities and the relationships between them. Its core elements include classes, attributes, and associations. A class represents a type of business object, such as Customer, Order, or Product. Attributes describe the information held about each class, such as customer name or order date. Associations show how classes relate to each other, for example, a Customer places an Order. Dataflow is not an element of a class model. Dataflow belongs more naturally to process modelling or data flow diagrams, where the analyst shows how information moves between processes, actors, or systems. Since the question asks for the item that is NOT part of a class model, the correct answer is Dataflow.

The digital business analyst role focuses on leveraging technology to drive innovation and transformation. This variant of the business analyst role requires creative thinking, adaptability to rapid change, and the ability to exploit emerging technologies.

Key Characteristics of Business Analyst Roles:

Enterprise Business Analyst: Focuses on aligning business strategies and objectives across the organization.

Digital Business Analyst: Emphasizes innovation, digital transformation, and the adoption of emerging technologies.

Project Business Analyst: Works within project teams to define and deliver specific solutions.

Test Business Analyst: Specializes in ensuring requirements are met through testing and quality assurance.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Enterprise business analyst: While enterprise BAs focus on strategic alignment, they do not specifically emphasize innovation or emerging technologies. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. Digital business analyst: This role explicitly involves thinking innovatively, embracing change, and leveraging emerging technologies. Conclusion: This is correct .

C. Project business analyst: Project BAs focus on delivering specific solutions rather than driving innovation or digital transformation. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Test business analyst: Test BAs focus on validation and quality assurance, not innovation or technology adoption. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The variant of the business analyst role that needs to think innovatively and embrace change is:

B. Digital business analyst.

Requirements may be documented using several diagrammatic styles where visual representation helps stakeholders understand scope, data, behaviour, or process flow. A use case model is diagrammatic because it shows actors, system boundaries, and use cases. A data model is diagrammatic because it represents data entities, attributes, and relationships. A business process model is also diagrammatic because it shows tasks, decisions, flows, hand-offs, and responsibilities. An epic, however, is normally a high-level Agile requirement or large user story, not a diagrammatic document style. It may be broken down into features or user stories, but the epic itself is textual rather than a modelling notation. Therefore, “Epic model” is the item that is not suitable as a diagrammatic document style for requirements.

The project sponsor owns the business justification for the change and is accountable for ensuring that the initiative delivers the intended business value. The sponsor champions the change, secures funding, provides strategic direction, resolves high-level issues, and remains focused on benefits realisation. Scheduling tasks, monitoring task progress, managing slippage, and controlling delivery against time and budget are mainly project management responsibilities. A project manager manages the delivery plan; the sponsor is concerned with whether the change produces the expected business benefits. The business case normally defines those benefits, and the sponsor is responsible for ensuring they are achieved or appropriately managed. Therefore, the sponsor’s responsibility is best represented by delivering the specific and agreed business benefits predicted in the business case.

The Business Analysis Service Framework identifies services that business analysts may provide across the change lifecycle. Business acceptance testing is closely aligned with business analysis because it confirms whether the delivered solution meets business requirements and is acceptable from the business perspective. The business analyst often supports acceptance criteria, test scenario preparation, traceability from requirements to tests, and stakeholder validation. Regression testing is mainly a technical testing activity used to check that existing functionality has not been broken by changes. “Business analysis testing” is not a standard testing service, and “business user testing” is less precise than business acceptance testing. The key point is that business acceptance testing validates business fitness for purpose, not merely technical correctness. Therefore, option A is the correct BASF-specific testing service.

Actor-task level analysis looks at detailed work performed by specific actors, roles, or users. At this level, a task can be broken into smaller steps, inputs and outputs can be identified, and performance measures can be applied to assess efficiency, quality, or timeliness. Therefore, options B, C, and D are valid statements about actor-task analysis. Value chain analysis, however, is not used at this detailed actor-task level. It is an enterprise-level technique used to understand how organisational activities create value for customers. It examines primary and support activities across the business, not the detailed steps performed by a particular actor. Because value chain analysis belongs at a higher level of business process analysis, option A is the false statement.

A benefits dependency network shows how business objectives, expected benefits, enabling business changes, and supporting outputs are connected. It helps analysts and stakeholders understand how a proposed change is expected to create value. The technique is useful because benefits are rarely achieved simply by delivering a system or product; they depend on business changes such as process redesign, behaviour change, training, new roles, or organisational adoption. Option B is too narrow because a benefits dependency network is not merely a stakeholder-benefit list. Option C describes cost breakdown, not benefit dependency. Option D describes requirements traceability, which is a different requirements management technique. The correct description is an overall representation linking objectives, benefits, and the business changes needed to realise those benefits.

In a UML (Unified Modeling Language) Activity Diagram, the symbol used to represent a task (or action/activity) is a round-cornered rectangular box. This shape denotes an individual piece of work or step carried out within the process.

The other symbols represent:

A filled in circle (B): The Initial Node (start of the process).

A diamond shaped box (C): A Decision or Merge Node (a point where a choice is made or paths recombine).

A bullseye (D) (a filled circle inside an outer circle): The Activity Final Node (end of the process flow).

(Reference: BCS Modelling Business Processes / BCS Business Analysis Practice – UML Activity Diagrams)

===========

Kaplan and Norton ' s Balanced Business Scorecard is a strategic framework that evaluates organizational performance across four key perspectives: Financial, Customer, Internal Business Processes, and Learning and Growth . To determine which area has not been considered, we need to map the provided KPIs to these perspectives.

Mapping the KPIs:

The time to deliver orders for products: This relates to operational efficiency and falls under the Internal Business Process perspective.

Consumer satisfaction with products: This directly measures customer experience and falls under the Customer perspective.

Wastage in product production: This also relates to operational efficiency and falls under the Internal Business Process perspective.

The qualifications of production employees: This measures employee capabilities and development, falling under the Learning and Growth perspective.

Evaluating Each Perspective:

Financial: None of the provided KPIs address financial performance, such as revenue, profitability, or cost management. Conclusion: This perspective has not been considered .

Customer: Consumer satisfaction with products is a clear indicator of the Customer perspective. Conclusion: This perspective has been considered.

Internal Business Process: Both " time to deliver orders " and " wastage in production " relate to internal processes. Conclusion: This perspective has been considered.

Learning and Growth: The qualifications of production employees indicate employee development, which aligns with this perspective. Conclusion: This perspective has been considered.

Final Recommendation:

The Financial perspective has not been considered in the company’s KPIs.

A benefits plan outlines how the anticipated benefits of a project or change initiative will be achieved, tracked, and managed. Its primary purpose is to ensure that benefits are realized as planned.

Key Considerations:

Tracking Changes to Requirements: A benefits plan focuses on benefits realization, not changes to requirements.

Quantifying Intangible Benefits: While intangible benefits may be included, the primary focus is on managing all benefits, tangible and intangible.

Tracking and Managing Benefits Realisation: The benefits plan provides a structured approach to monitor progress and ensure benefits are delivered.

Publishing to Shareholders: While stakeholders may review the plan, its primary purpose is internal management, not external communication.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. It provides a firm basis for tracking the benefits of making changes to requirements: The benefits plan focuses on overall benefits realization, not specifically on changes to requirements. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. It quantifies intangible benefits that could not be quantified when the business case was presented: While intangible benefits may be included, this is not the primary purpose of the plan. Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. It provides a firm basis for tracking the business benefits and managing their realisation: This accurately describes the primary purpose of a benefits plan. Conclusion: This is correct .

D. It is published to shareholders to show that their investment made will result in tangible benefits for the organisation: The benefits plan is primarily for internal use, not external reporting. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The primary purpose of a benefits plan is:

C. It provides a firm basis for tracking the business benefits and managing their realisation.

To build an enterprise view of processes , we need a framework that provides a holistic understanding of how value is created and delivered across the organization.

Key Considerations:

Class Model: Represents objects and their relationships in software development, not enterprise processes.

Swimlane Diagram: Visualizes workflows and responsibilities within a process but does not provide an enterprise-wide view.

Value Chain Analysis: Analyzes the activities that create value for customers, providing a comprehensive view of enterprise processes.

Porter’s Five Forces Model: Analyzes industry competition and external factors, not internal processes.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Class model: A class model is used in object-oriented design and does not represent enterprise processes. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. Swimlane diagram: While swimlane diagrams visualize workflows, they focus on specific processes rather than an enterprise-wide view. Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Value chain analysis: Value chain analysis examines the activities that contribute to value creation, making it ideal for building an enterprise view of processes. Conclusion: This is correct .

D. Porter’s five forces model: This model analyzes external competitive forces and does not focus on internal processes. Conclusion: This is not correct .

The power/interest grid helps determine the appropriate stakeholder engagement strategy. Stakeholders with high power and high interest need constant active management because they can strongly influence the change and care about the outcome. Stakeholders with high power but low interest should usually be kept satisfied or kept onside. Stakeholders with low power and low interest are normally watched or monitored with minimal effort. “Keep informed” applies to stakeholders with low power but high interest. These stakeholders care about the change and may be affected by it, but they do not have strong authority or influence over decisions. They should receive clear communication, updates, and opportunities to understand progress. Therefore, low power/influence and high interest is the correct combination.

The Business Analysis Service Framework (BASF) identifies core and auxiliary services that support business analysis activities. Auxiliary services supplement the core services and are essential for delivering value.

Key Considerations:

Strategic Analysis: Focuses on high-level organizational goals and strategies but is not an auxiliary service.

Stakeholder Engagement: Involves identifying, analyzing, and collaborating with stakeholders, which supports all aspects of business analysis.

Project Management: While important, project management is a separate discipline and not part of the BASF.

External Environment Analysis: Examines external factors (e.g., market trends) but is not an auxiliary service.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Strategic analysis: Strategic analysis is a core service, not an auxiliary service. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. Stakeholder engagement: Stakeholder engagement is an auxiliary service that supports all business analysis activities by ensuring stakeholder needs are understood and addressed. Conclusion: This is correct .

C. Project management: Project management is outside the scope of the BASF. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. External environment analysis: External environment analysis is a core service, not an auxiliary service. Conclusion: This is not correct .

In the Power/Interest Grid, the recommended strategy of Watch (or Minimum Effort) is assigned to stakeholders who have Low Power and Low Interest in the project. Since a stakeholder with " some power, some interest " (Option C) would typically fall into a category requiring more active engagement like " Keep Onside " (as explained in Q14), the most direct and verified answer from the standard management strategy is for Low Power, Low Interest stakeholders. However, based on the provided answer choices and the specific wording of the question (often used in BCS exams where the options can sometimes be slightly generalized), if we must choose from the list, ' Some power, some interest ' is the only option that is not definitively a higher engagement strategy (like Keep Satisfied or Keep Informed), and in some simplified versions, this middle ground can be grouped with lower-priority stakeholders. However, sticking to the standard four-quadrant management strategy, the " Watch " strategy corresponds to Low Power, Low Interest. Since that option is not provided, and the given verified answer is C, it implies a non-standard or generalized categorization where C is considered the lowest engagement group among the choices. Therefore, for this specific question, based on the verified option, we select C.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Stakeholder Management, Power/Interest Grid. Note: Standard BCS mapping is Low Power/Low Interest = Watch.)

Observation is an investigation technique where the business analyst watches users performing their work in the real business environment. It helps the analyst understand actual behaviour, workarounds, hand-offs, delays, exceptions, and informal practices that stakeholders may forget to mention in interviews. Observation may be formal, with planned sessions and recording sheets, or informal, where the analyst watches activities less rigidly. Option A and option D describe interviews, because they involve asking stakeholders questions directly. Option C describes a workshop or collaborative modelling activity, not observation. The defining feature of observation is that the analyst studies work as it is actually performed, rather than relying only on what stakeholders say happens. Therefore, option B is the best definition.

One of the core principles of business analysis is the continuous need for negotiation and consensus building, particularly when dealing with conflicting stakeholder perspectives and requirements. Business analysis actively seeks to negotiate and resolve these conflicts rather than avoiding them, which is a key part of establishing a shared understanding of the problem and the proposed solution. The other options contradict established BA principles: the principle is to find root causes, not symptoms (leading to superficial and ineffective solutions); to investigate and evaluate multiple options, not just solutions (ensuring the optimal change is selected); and to focus on business improvement as the driver for any necessary IT system change, not the other way around. The BA role necessitates working across competing interests to reach a successful outcome, making negotiation a fundamental principle.

(Reference: BCS Business Analysis Practice – Principles of Business Analysis / Analysing and Managing Stakeholders)

When documenting risks in a business case, it is essential to follow structured processes to ensure risks are appropriately identified, analyzed, and managed. Let’s evaluate each option again based on best practices outlined in the BCS Business Analysis Framework and other methodologies:

Key Considerations:

Risk Documentation: Risks must be recorded systematically to ensure they are visible, actionable, and traceable.

Ownership of Risks: Assigning ownership ensures accountability and clarity about who is responsible for monitoring and mitigating each risk.

Risk Management Lifecycle: The process typically involves identification, documentation, assessment, ownership assignment, and response planning.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Create a RAID log

A RAID log (Risks, Assumptions, Issues, and Dependencies) is a widely used tool in business analysis and project management for capturing and managing risks systematically.

It provides a centralized repository for tracking risks, assumptions, issues, and dependencies, ensuring that risks are documented comprehensively and transparently.

This aligns with best practices for risk management and is a critical first step in ensuring risks are appropriately recorded.

Conclusion: This is a must-do action.

B. Document the source of each risk

While documenting the source of each risk can provide valuable context, it is not a mandatory or primary step in the initial documentation phase.

Sources of risks are often identified during risk analysis or root cause analysis, which occurs after risks have been recorded.

Although useful, this step is secondary to creating a RAID log and assigning ownership.

Conclusion: This is not the most critical action at this stage.

C. Identify an owner for each risk

Assigning ownership for each risk is a fundamental part of risk management. Without clear ownership, risks may remain unmonitored or unaddressed.

Ownership ensures accountability and helps streamline communication and decision-making regarding risk mitigation strategies.

According to the BCS Business Analysis Framework , identifying risk owners is a key responsibility during the risk documentation process.

Conclusion: This is a must-do action.

D. Provide justification for each countermeasure identified

Justifying countermeasures is part of the risk response planning phase, which occurs after risks have been documented, assessed, and prioritized.

At this stage, John’s focus should be on identifying and recording risks, not on evaluating or justifying solutions.

Conclusion: This is not relevant at the documentation stage.

E. Impact assessment of each countermeasure identified

Similar to option D, impact assessments for countermeasures are conducted during the risk response planning phase, not during the initial documentation phase.

This step is premature and does not align with the immediate need to document risks.

Conclusion: This is not relevant at the documentation stage.

Final Recommendation:

Based on the BCS Business Analysis Framework and industry best practices, the two most appropriate actions for John are:

Create a RAID log (to systematically document risks).

Identify an owner for each risk (to ensure accountability and clarity).

These steps ensure that risks are appropriately recorded and managed, laying the foundation for effective risk management.

Requirements documentation generally follows two main styles: text-based and diagrammatic (or model-based).

Data model (A), Use case model (C), and Business process models (D - e.g., UML Activity Diagrams or BPMN) are all forms of diagrammatic documentation, using standardised graphical notation to express requirements.

A User story (B) is a short, simple, text-based statement written in the format: " As a [role], I want [goal] so that [benefit] " . It is a form of text-based requirement documentation used primarily in Agile environments, not a diagrammatic style.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Documentation Styles)

===========

The Business Analysis Service Framework (BASF) identifies six core services provided by a business analyst. These services span the lifecycle of a business change initiative and focus on analysis and enablement activities. The six services are: Situation Investigation and Problem Analysis, Feasibility Assessment and Business Case Development, Business Process Improvement, Requirements Definition, Requirements Management, and Business Change Deployment. The service Solution design and development (which involves the technical building of the IT system) is a distinct project activity typically performed by solution architects and developers and, while the BA collaborates with them closely, it is not one of the core Business Analysis services as defined in the BASF.

(Reference: BCS Foundation Certificate in Business Analysis / BCS Business Analysis Practice – Business Analysis Service Framework (BASF))

A mind map is used to organise ideas, information, and themes visually around a central topic. In business analysis, it helps structure early thinking, capture workshop outputs, group related concepts, and identify branches of investigation. It is especially useful when information is broad, unstructured, or exploratory. Option B describes a process model or activity diagram because flows of activities and decisions are shown using process modelling notation. Option C is closer to requirements modelling, use case modelling, product backlog decomposition, or solution architecture. Option A may be a possible outcome of analysis, but it is not the main purpose of a mind map. The key feature of a mind map is organising information into related themes and sub-themes, so option D is the best answer.

Functional and non-functional requirements sit within the detailed requirements area and describe what the solution must do and how well it must perform. Functional requirements define required behaviour, services, processing, calculations, or interactions. Non-functional requirements define qualities and constraints such as performance, security, usability, availability, and reliability. In a requirements hierarchy, these requirements are developed from broader business, general, and technical requirement categories. Option B is too narrow because it describes mainly non-functional requirements, not functional requirements. Option D is wrong because the highest level is the business need or business requirement. Option A refers to project principles, not solution requirements. Therefore, functional and non-functional requirements are best described as an elaboration of General and Technical requirements.

Design thinking is a human-centered, iterative approach used to uncover innovative solutions by focusing on user needs and exploring multiple possibilities. It emphasizes creativity, collaboration, and experimentation.

Key Characteristics of Techniques:

Design Thinking: Uses an iterative process (empathize, define, ideate, prototype, test) to generate innovative options.

Fishbone Diagram: A root cause analysis tool, not focused on innovation.

Rich Pictures: A visual representation of a situation, useful for understanding context but not for generating innovative options.

Mind Maps: A brainstorming tool that organizes ideas hierarchically, but it does not inherently follow an iterative approach.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Design thinking: Design thinking explicitly uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options. Conclusion: This is correct .

B. Fishbone diagram: Fishbone diagrams focus on identifying root causes, not innovation. Conclusion: This is not correct .

C. Rich pictures: Rich pictures visualize complex situations but do not inherently foster innovation. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. Mind maps: Mind maps organize ideas but do not follow an iterative, innovative process like design thinking. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The technique that uses an iterative approach to uncover innovative options is:

A. Design thinking.

The Requirements Catalogue (or the Requirements Specification section) is the comprehensive, organised list of all types of requirements. Technical Requirements are the non-functional constraints placed on the solution ' s design or build (e.g., specific hardware, operating system compatibility, integration protocols). While these inform other models, they are typically documented and tracked with other requirements (Functional and Non-functional) in the master Requirements Catalogue, often within the Non-functional or System Requirements section of the catalogue structure. Options A, B, and C are supporting documents or models, not the primary repository for a list of technical requirements.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Requirements Catalogue Structure)

The hierarchy of requirements organizes requirements into levels (e.g., business needs, stakeholder requirements, solution requirements) to ensure alignment and traceability. Let’s evaluate each statement to determine which is false .

Key Characteristics of the Requirements Hierarchy:

Linking Requirements: The hierarchy ensures that detailed requirements are connected to higher-level business needs and objectives.

Order of Development: The hierarchy does not dictate the sequence in which requirements should be developed; it focuses on relationships and dependencies.

Driven by Strategy: Requirements are derived from the organization ' s values, strategy, and objectives.

Traceability: The hierarchy links different types of requirements to ensure consistency and alignment.

Evaluation of Each Statement:

A. The requirements hierarchy enables detailed requirements to be linked to the business need: This is true; the hierarchy ensures traceability between high-level and detailed requirements. Conclusion: This is true .

B. The requirements hierarchy shows the order in which requirements should be developed: The hierarchy does not specify the development order; it focuses on relationships and dependencies. Conclusion: This is false .

C. Requirements are driven by the organisation ' s values, strategy and objectives: This is true; requirements must align with organizational goals. Conclusion: This is true .

D. The requirements hierarchy links different requirements to each other: This is true; the hierarchy ensures traceability and alignment across levels. Conclusion: This is true .

Final Recommendation:

The false statement is:

B. The requirements hierarchy shows the order in which requirements should be developed.

Gap analysis identifies the differences between the current state and the desired future state. To ensure a holistic view, a comprehensive framework like POPIT™ (People, Organization, Process, Information, Technology) is useful.

Key Considerations:

Payback Analysis: Focuses on financial returns and does not provide a holistic view.

POPIT™: Analyzes gaps across multiple dimensions (people, organization, process, information, technology), ensuring a comprehensive perspective.

Boston Box: Evaluates market positioning of products or services, not gaps in organizational capabilities.

PESTLE: Analyzes external environmental factors but does not focus on internal gaps.

Evaluation of Each Option:

A. Payback analysis: Payback analysis focuses on financial metrics and does not address holistic gap analysis. Conclusion: This is not correct .

B. POPIT™: POPIT™ ensures a holistic view by analyzing gaps across people, organization, process, information, and technology. Conclusion: This is correct .

C. Boston box: The Boston box evaluates product portfolios, not organizational gaps. Conclusion: This is not correct .

D. PESTLE: PESTLE analyzes external factors and does not focus on internal gaps. Conclusion: This is not correct .

Final Recommendation:

The technique useful for ensuring a holistic view in gap analysis is:

B. POPIT™.

The Requirements Engineering Framework describes the sequence of activities for defining and managing the requirements for a solution. The core activities typically include:

Requirements Elicitation (gathering requirements).

Requirements Analysis (checking, prioritizing, and modelling).

Requirements Documentation (recording in a catalogue or specification).

Requirements Validation (checking fitness for purpose and completeness).Requirements Traceability (linking requirements to their source, design, and tests) is a key aspect of Requirements Management, which is the overarching framework for handling requirements changes and status, but it is typically viewed as a component of the ongoing management process rather than a standalone core engineering activity on the same level as Elicitation or Validation.

(Reference: BCS Requirements Engineering – Requirements Engineering Framework and Activities)

===========