Data-Architect Exam Dumps : Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201)

According to the exam guide, one of the objectives is to "describe the use cases and considerations for using AppExchange apps and Wave Analytics"1. This implies that options A and B are both valid approaches to provide more analytical insights. Option C is not correct because weekly snapshots are used to track changes over time, not to provide advanced analytics3. Option D is not correct because setup audit trails are used to monitor changes in the setup menu, not to provide analytical insights.

 Changing the master-detail relationship to a lookup relationship is the best solution for allowing the creation of generic discount requests without the custom product object as its master record. A lookup relationship allows you to create child records without requiring a parent record. It also gives you more flexibility in defining the sharing and security settings for each object

Changing Opportunity Amount field access to Read Only for sales users field-level security (option C) is the best way to address the overwriting issue, as it prevents sales users from updating the field that is controlled by PPS, and ensures data consistency and accuracy. Creating a custom field for Opportunity amount that PSS updates separating the field sales user updates (option A) or creating a custom field for Opportunity amount that sales users update separating the field that PPS updates (option D) are not good solutions, as they may create confusion and inconsistency with the Opportunity Forecast feature. Changing PSS integration to update only Opportunity Amount field when the value is null (option B) is also not a good solution, as it may cause data loss or conflicts with the sales users’ inputs.