Salesforce Data-Architect Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

According to Trailhead2, one of the best practices to increase Salesforce adoption is to migrate existing data from legacy systems or spreadsheets into Salesforce, so that users can access all their data in one place and leverage the features and functionality of Salesforce. Option B is the correct answer because it suggests defining a standard mapping and training sales users to import opportunity data from Excel files into Salesforce, which can help them transition from their old process and increase their confidence and satisfaction with Salesforce. Option A is incorrect because using the Excel connector to Salesforce does not migrate the data into Salesforce, but only syncs it between Excel and Salesforce, which can cause data inconsistency and duplication issues. Option C is incorrect because loading data in an external database and providing access to it does not increase Salesforce adoption, but rather creates another system for users to manage and switch between. Option D is incorrect because creating a chatter group and uploading all Excel files to it does not migrate the data into Salesforce, but only stores it as attachments, which cannot be used for reporting or analysis purposes.

 Patients as Person Accounts, Payment providers as Accounts, & Doctors as Person Accounts is the optimal selection by the data architect to map the actor to Salesforce objects. This is because Person Accounts are a special type of accounts that can store both business and personal information for individual customers. Payment providers are organizations that pay for the care of patients, so they can be modeled as Accounts. Doctors are also individuals who provide care plans for patients and need access to patient information, so they can also be modeled as Person Accounts.

The recommended course of action to appropriately integrate the new Opportunity engagement system with Salesforce is to bring the stakeholders together to discuss the appropriate data strategy moving forward. This is because there may be valuable data in both systems that need to be reconciled and harmonized, and the Master Data Management (MDM) strategy may need to be revised or updated to accommodate the new system. The other options are not recommended, as they may result in data loss, inconsistency, or duplication