ISTQB Related Exams
CTAL-TTA Exam
BestFor Incorporated is a rapidly growing online financial services company that offers guidance to its customers on a range of financial products. Its first website, BestForMortgages, was launched two years ago, shortly followed by BestForPensions. The popularity of both sites has driven the company to expand its offerings into other sectors and a third website, BestForFood, has recently been released.
The first two websites have proven to be functionally robust but suffered from performance issues due to:
Underestimation of concurrent user access at peak times in its original operational profiles
Data volumes rapidly growing beyond expectations on a single database shared by both sites.
All three websites share the same web server.
The BestForFood system has been running live for several months, however the following significant non-functional defects have been recorded:
A) The layout and navigation of the BestForFood website was not considered by the users as consistent with BestForPensions and BestForMortgages
B) Soon after delivering the BestForFood system the performance of both BestForPensions and BestForMortgages noticeably slowed
C) The time taken to diagnose, repair and re-test production defects did not meet BestForFood service level agreements
D) BestForFood performance was adversely impacted by unexpected growth in data volumes
E) The time taken to install monthly builds into the production system exceeded agreed timescales.
Which TWO of these defects might have been prevented had portability testing and compatibility testing been employed?
You are asked to provide a practical and pragmatic testing solution for a commercial system where the main user interface is via the Internet. It is critical that the company’s existing good name and market profile are not damaged in any way. Time to market is not a critical issue when appropriate testing solutions are identified to mitigate business risks.
A product risk assessment has revealed the following product risk:
• Abnormal application termination due to connection failure of the main interface.
Which of the following is the appropriate test type to address this risk?
Consider the simplified logic below for crediting money to a bank account.
Receive money and account number to be credited
IF account number is valid
IF customer account is active
Store current account balance as oldBalance
Credit money to account
IF oldBalance < zero
IF balance now >= zero
Set message "Overdraft cleared"
ELSE
Set message "A/c overdrawn"
ENDIF
ELSE
Set message = "You have more money"
ENDIF
IF account holder is VIP customer
Send message by email to customer
ENDIF
ELSE
Set message "A/c inactive"
Send message by email to supervisor
ENDIF
ELSE
Add 1 to count of invalid inputs
ENDIF
What is the minimum quantity of test cases that will give 100% statement coverage?