ISTQB CT-AI Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The syllabus states:

"Concept drift occurs when the operational environment changes without the trained model changing correspondingly. The outputs of the model become less accurate and less useful. Therefore, the operational model should be regularly evaluated against its acceptance criteria."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 7.6, Page 54 of 99)

Section5.3 – AI Support for Defect Predictionof the ISTQB CT-AI syllabus explains that AI-based defect prediction models rely onhistorical patterns, including past defects, code behavior, and similar system configurations. ML models trained on prior defect data can identifycomponents likely to contain defectswhen new changes resemble previous defect-inducing patterns. This directly supports OptionA, which states that defect prediction is most effective when based on previous similar constellations.

Option B is incorrect: ML can predictwhich componentsare likely to fail, not only whether defects exist. Option C is incomplete; code metrics help, but defect prediction relies onmanycontextual features (historical defects, code churn, commit frequency, etc.). Option D is wrong because defect prediction isnotbased on formal principles and typically requiresmany features, not just a few.

Thus,Option Ais the correct and syllabus-consistent answer.

The syllabus explicitly mentions challenges of handling personal data and ensuring privacy when testing AI-based systems:

"The management of personal data and sensitive data is often a concern during testing, as testing typically requires realistic data and it is difficult to fully anonymize data."

(Reference: ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus v1.0, Section 7.3, page 52 of 99)