CESP Exam Dumps : Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP)

 The LEAST appropriate way to proceed is to coach her how to quit the job in a professional manner. This would imply that she is not capable of working in that environment and that there are no other options to help her succeed. It would also undermine her self-confidence and career goals. A better approach would be to explore the possible accommodations and supports that could make her job more manageable and enjoyable. You could also visit her office and identify how she can create more order in her workload, such as prioritizing tasks, using a planner, or delegating responsibilities. You could also talk to her support team about ways to cope with her anxiety, such as relaxation techniques, counseling, or medication. References:

• CESP Candidate Handbook, page 13, Domain 4: Workplace and Related Supports, Task 4.1: Identify and implement accommodations and supports to meet the needs of the individual and employer, Knowledge of 4.1.1: Types of accommodations and supports
• CESP Practice Exam, question 2, answer C: The job seeker’s strengths, interests, needs and conditions for employment.

The least appropriate statement to use in negotiating a position with a potential employer is option A. This statement does not follow the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, empowerment, and dignity. It focuses on the job-seeker’s disability rather than his abilities, and it suggests that the employer should create a position for him out of charity or pity, rather than based on his skills and the employer’s needs. This statement can also create a negative impression of the job-seeker as someone who needs special treatment or accommodation, rather than someone who can add value to the company.

The other statements are more appropriate than option A, for the following reasons:

• Option B: This statement follows the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, career development, and quality outcomes. It identifies the job-seeker’s skills and the employer’s needs, and it proposes a mutually beneficial solution that can increase the productivity and efficiency of the business. It also implies that the job-seeker can perform the basic office work without requiring significant modifications or supports.
• Option C: This statement follows the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, empowerment, and respect. It highlights the job-seeker’s work experience and education, and it expresses interest in exploring possible job opportunities in the business. It also shows professionalism and courtesy by asking for a scheduled time to discuss the matter, rather than imposing or demanding a meeting.
• Option D: This statement follows the core values and principles of employment support, such as individualization, career development, and quality outcomes. It identifies the job-seeker’s skills and the employer’s needs, and it offers a cost-effective solution that can reduce the overtime expenses and workload of the current workers. It also indicates that the job-seeker can perform the data entry tasks without requiring significant modifications or supports.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide

The CESP certification is based on the principles of individualized, integrated, and competitive employment for people with disabilities1. One of the core values of this approach is to promote the self-determination and empowerment of the individuals being supported2. This means that the employment support professionals should respect the preferences, choices, and goals of the individuals, and help them develop the skills and confidence to achieve their desired outcomes2.

The options A, B, and C are examples of reasonable supports that align with these principles. They provide Susan with visual, auditory, or human cues that can help her remember the sequence of her tasks, without interfering with her autonomy or productivity. They also allow her to use the tools or strategies that work best for her learning style and preferences. These supports can be faded over time as Susan becomes more familiar and comfortable with her job3.

The option D, however, is an example of an unreasonable support that violates these principles. It implies that the store manager does not trust Susan to perform her tasks correctly, and that he or she needs to monitor and control her every hour. This can undermine Susan’s self-esteem, motivation, and satisfaction with her job. It can also create a negative or hostile relationship between Susan and her manager, and affect her integration and inclusion in the workplace. Moreover, it can be disruptive and inefficient for both Susan and the manager to have such frequent check-ins, especially if they interfere with their other duties or responsibilities. References: