CESP Exam Dumps : Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP)

An assistive technology tool is any device, software, or equipment that helps people work around their challenges and achieve their goals1. A visual task list is an example of an assistive technology tool that can help employees with cognitive disabilities, learning disabilities, or attention deficits to organize their tasks, prioritize their work, and stay focused23. The other options are not correct because:

• An individualized education plan (IEP) is a document that outlines the special education and related services that a student with a disability will receive in school4. It is not relevant to the workplace setting.
• A workplace accommodation is any change in the work environment or in the way things are customarily done that enables an individual with a disability to enjoy equal employment opportunities5. A visual task list may be considered a workplace accommodation if it is provided by the employer to enable the employee to perform the essential functions of the job, but it is not the only example of a workplace accommodation.
• A task analysis is a process of breaking down a complex task into smaller, manageable steps that can be taught to the learner6. A visual task list may be based on a task analysis, but it is not the same thing. A task analysis is a method of instruction, while a visual task list is a tool for self-management. References:
• Domain 4 Workplace and Related Supports123456
• What is Assistive Technology?
• Using Visual Schedules: A Guide for Parents
• Visual Task Lists for Students with Disabilities
• Individualized Education Program (IEP)
• Workplace Accommodations
• Task Analysis

The best sustainable structured activity for this situation is to coach the material handler to build relationships with co-workers who take lunch and return to work at the same time. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as self-determination, inclusion, and natural supports. By encouraging the material handler to socialize with his co-workers, he can benefit from peer modeling, accountability, and positive reinforcement. He can also feel more connected and valued at his workplace, which can increase his motivation and satisfaction. This option is also sustainable, as it does not rely on external or artificial interventions that may not be available or effective in the long term.

The other options are not as good as option A, for the following reasons:

• Option B: Referring to an assistive technology person to inquire if anything can help with time management is not a bad idea, but it may not be the most effective or appropriate solution for this situation. Assistive technology can be helpful for some individuals with disabilities who need specific tools or devices to perform their job tasks, but it may not address the underlying reasons why the material handler is returning late from lunch breaks. Assistive technology can also be costly, inaccessible, or incompatible with the work environment or the individual’s preferences. Therefore, this option is not the best sustainable structured activity for this situation.
• Option C: Having a parent, friend, or job coach call him to monitor time spent on lunch is not a good option, as it violates the core values and principles of employment support, such as self-determination, dignity, and respect. This option implies that the material handler is not capable of managing his own time or making his own decisions, and that he needs constant supervision or reminders from others. This option can also create dependency, resentment, or embarrassment for the material handler, and can damage his relationship with his employer or co-workers. Therefore, this option is not a good sustainable structured activity for this situation.
• Option D: Instructing the supervisor to remind him when to return to work is also not a good option, as it does not support the core values and principles of employment support, such as empowerment, inclusion, and natural supports. This option places the responsibility andburden on the supervisor, who may not have the time, skills, or interest to do so. This option can also create conflict, tension, or mistrust between the material handler and his supervisor, and can undermine his autonomy and confidence. Therefore, this option is not a good sustainable structured activity for this situation.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide

According to the CESP handbook, one of the core competencies of an employment support professional is to facilitate natural supports in the workplace1. Natural supports are the relationships and assistance that occur among co-workers and supervisors in a typical work environment2. They can help the employee with ADHD to integrate into the work culture, learn new skills, and receive feedback and encouragement3. Working with the employee at all times to keep him on task is the least important structured activity because it may undermine his autonomy, self-confidence, and motivation. It may also create a dependency on the employment support professional and prevent the development of natural supports. A better approach would be to help the employee find strategies to cope with his ADHD symptoms, such as minimizing distractions, breaking down tasks, using reminders, and taking breaks4. Movinghim to a less busy time of the day, developing a routine of tasks, and having the co-workers be his natural supports are all more important structured activities than working with him at all times. References: 1: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 5 2: CESP Candidate Handbook, page 18 3: Natural Supports in the Workplace 4: ADHD in the Workplace