CESP Exam Dumps : Certified Employment Support Professional (CESP)

 The least effective question to ask is “How do you feel about employing people with disabilities?” This is because this question is not relevant to the purpose of an informational interview, which is to gather information about the business, the industry, the job requirements, and the employer’s needs1. Asking this question may also create a negative impression of the job developer and the job seeker, as it may imply that the job seeker is not qualified or capable of performing the job, or that the employer has a bias or prejudice against people with disabilities2. Furthermore, this question may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits employers from asking disability-related questions before making a job offer3.

References:

• 1: Informational Interviewing: A Guide for Employment Support Professionals1
• 2: Job Development Dos and Don’ts2
• 3: Pre-Employment Inquiries and the ADA3

The CESP certification is based on the principles of individualized, integrated, and competitive employment for people with disabilities1. One of the core values of this approach is to promote the self-determination and empowerment of the individuals being supported2. This means that the employment support professionals should respect the preferences, choices, and goals of the individuals, and help them develop the skills and confidence to achieve their desired outcomes2.

The options A, B, and C are examples of reasonable supports that align with these principles. They provide Susan with visual, auditory, or human cues that can help her remember the sequence of her tasks, without interfering with her autonomy or productivity. They also allow her to use the tools or strategies that work best for her learning style and preferences. These supports can be faded over time as Susan becomes more familiar and comfortable with her job3.

The option D, however, is an example of an unreasonable support that violates these principles. It implies that the store manager does not trust Susan to perform her tasks correctly, and that he or she needs to monitor and control her every hour. This can undermine Susan’s self-esteem, motivation, and satisfaction with her job. It can also create a negative or hostile relationship between Susan and her manager, and affect her integration and inclusion in the workplace. Moreover, it can be disruptive and inefficient for both Susan and the manager to have such frequent check-ins, especially if they interfere with their other duties or responsibilities. References:

The best sustainable structured activity for this situation is to coach the material handler to build relationships with co-workers who take lunch and return to work at the same time. This option supports the core values and principles of employment support, such as self-determination, inclusion, and natural supports. By encouraging the material handler to socialize with his co-workers, he can benefit from peer modeling, accountability, and positive reinforcement. He can also feel more connected and valued at his workplace, which can increase his motivation and satisfaction. This option is also sustainable, as it does not rely on external or artificial interventions that may not be available or effective in the long term.

The other options are not as good as option A, for the following reasons:

• Option B: Referring to an assistive technology person to inquire if anything can help with time management is not a bad idea, but it may not be the most effective or appropriate solution for this situation. Assistive technology can be helpful for some individuals with disabilities who need specific tools or devices to perform their job tasks, but it may not address the underlying reasons why the material handler is returning late from lunch breaks. Assistive technology can also be costly, inaccessible, or incompatible with the work environment or the individual’s preferences. Therefore, this option is not the best sustainable structured activity for this situation.
• Option C: Having a parent, friend, or job coach call him to monitor time spent on lunch is not a good option, as it violates the core values and principles of employment support, such as self-determination, dignity, and respect. This option implies that the material handler is not capable of managing his own time or making his own decisions, and that he needs constant supervision or reminders from others. This option can also create dependency, resentment, or embarrassment for the material handler, and can damage his relationship with his employer or co-workers. Therefore, this option is not a good sustainable structured activity for this situation.
• Option D: Instructing the supervisor to remind him when to return to work is also not a good option, as it does not support the core values and principles of employment support, such as empowerment, inclusion, and natural supports. This option places the responsibility andburden on the supervisor, who may not have the time, skills, or interest to do so. This option can also create conflict, tension, or mistrust between the material handler and his supervisor, and can undermine his autonomy and confidence. Therefore, this option is not a good sustainable structured activity for this situation.

References:

• APSE CESP Practice Exam
• APSE CESP Exam Content Outline
• APSE CESP Study Guide