PCI SSC Assessor_New_V4 Dumps

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, active network connections are tracked so that invalid response traffic can be identified. This is one of the requirements for preventing replay attacks and ensuring secure communication.

Hashing is a form of one-way encryption that transforms a data element into a unique fixed-size data element (hash value) without a way to get the original data element from the hash value1. Truncation is a method of rendering the full PAN unreadable by permanently removing a segment of the PAN data2. PCI DSS Requirement 3.4 states that entities must render the PAN unreadable wherever it is stored, using any of the following methods: one-way hashes based on strong cryptography, truncation, index tokens and pads, or strong cryptography with associated key-management processes and procedures3. However, PCI DSS Requirement 3.4e also states that if hashed and truncated versions of the same PAN are present in the environment, additional controls must be in place to ensure that the hashed and truncated versions cannot be correlated to reconstruct the original PAN3. This is because if an attacker obtains both the hashed and truncated versions of the same PAN, they may be able to use a brute-force or dictionary attack to guess the original PAN by hashing and truncating different PAN values until they find a match4. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

The other options are not true regarding the presence of both hashed and truncated versions of the same PAN in an environment. Option B is not true because PCI DSS does not require the hashed version of the PAN to be also truncated, although it is a recommended best practice to further reduce the risk of exposing the original PAN5. Option C is not true because PCI DSS does not require the hashed and truncated versions to be correlated, as this would defeat the purpose of rendering the PAN unreadable and increase the risk of exposing the original PAN. Option D is not true because PCI DSS does not prohibit the presence of both hashed and truncated versions of the same PAN in the same environment, as long as additional controls are in place to prevent the reconstruction of the original PAN. References:

• Protect hashed CardHolder Data according to PCI DSS 3.4 - Advantio
• PCI DSS Truncation Rules and Guidelines - Truvantis
• PCI DSS v3.2.1
• Storing Card Numbers using hashed and truncated version of PAN
• pci dss - Credit card data security - hashing, truncation and encryption - Information Security Stack Exchange

According to requirement 3.1.2, an assessment with at least one requirement marked as Not Tested is considered a partial assessment, which means it does not meet all the requirements and controls defined in Appendix E of the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that assessments are conducted in accordance with PCI DSS.

classifying media that contains cardholder data is intended to ensure that media is property protected according to the sensitivity of the data it contains, which means it should be markedwith labels or tags that indicate its level of confidentiality or integrity. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that media containing cardholder data is properly labeled.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, security policies and operational procedures should be distributed to and understood by all affected parties, such as management, staff, contractors, vendors, and service providers. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that security policies and operational procedures are communicated and followed consistently.

when a cryptographic key is retired and replaced with a new key, the assessor will verify that the assessor observed the entity’s systems were compliant with the requirement, which means they should have implemented compensating controls to address any weaknesses or gaps in the customized control. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that an entity can use both approaches when appropriate.

The PCI DSS requires that access to databases containing cardholder data is restricted to authorized users and applications, and that direct access to such databases is prohibited. According to the PCI DSS Requirement 7.1.2, “Restrict access to privileged user IDs to least privileges necessary to perform job responsibilities.” Furthermore, according to the PCI DSS Requirement 8.3.1, “Implement multi-factor authentication for all non-console access into the cardholder data environment for personnel with administrative access.” Therefore, the scenario that meets the PCI DSS requirements for restricting access to databases containing cardholder data is the one where user access to the database is only through programmatic methods, such as through an application interface that enforces authentication, authorization, and encryption. The other scenarios either allow direct access to the database, or do not limit the access to the least privileges necessary, or do not use multi-factor authentication for administrative access. References: [PCI DSS v3.2.1], Card Production Security Assessor - Logical - Credly

Segmentation is a method of isolating system components that store, process, or transmit cardholder data from systems that do not, by using security controls such as firewalls, routers, switches, or other devices1. Segmentation can reduce the scope of the cardholder data environment (CDE) and thus reduce the scope of the PCI DSS assessment, as only the systems and networks within the CDE or connected to the CDE are subject to PCI DSS requirements2. However, segmentation is not mandatory for PCI DSS compliance, and it is the responsibility of the entity to define and document the scope of their CDE and the segmentation controls they use2.

The assessor’s role is to verify the scope of the CDE and the effectiveness of the segmentation controls, as specified in PCI DSS Requirement 11.3.43. The assessor must verify that the segmentation controls are configured properly and functioning as intended, and that they allow only necessary traffic into the CDE. The assessor must also perform penetration testing on the segmentation controls at least annually and after anychanges to the segmentation methods, to confirm that there are no exploitable vulnerabilities that could allow an attacker to access the CDE from out-of-scope systems3. Therefore, the correct answer is option D.

The other options are not true regarding the role of the assessor in verifying segmentation for PCI DSS. Option A is not true because the assessor must verify not only that the segmentation controls allow only necessary traffic into the CDE, but also that they are configured properly and functioning as intended, as stated in option D. Option B is not true because the assessor does not need to verify that the payment card brands have approved the segmentation, as PCI DSS does not require such approval, although the payment card brands may have their own policies and procedures for segmentation that the entity must follow2. Option C is not true because the assessor does not need to verify that approved devices and applications are used for the segmentation controls, as PCI DSS does not mandate the use of specific devices or applications for segmentation, although it requires the entity to use industry-accepted and strong methods for segmentation2. References:

• Network Segmentation - PCI Security Standards Council
• Guidance for PCI DSS Scoping and Network Segmentation
• PCI DSS v3.2.1

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, internal vulnerability scans must be performed after a significant change in any component or configuration that affects cardholder data or payment processing systems. This is one of the requirements for identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities that could compromise cardholder data.

 One of the best practices for hardening a firewall is to disable any firewall functions that are not needed in production, such as unused services, ports, protocols, or features. This reduces the attack surface and minimizes the potential for exploitation. According to the PCI Card Production Logical Security Requirements, section 3.2.1, “The firewall must be configured to deny all traffic by default and allow only traffic that is explicitly required for the card production environment.” Furthermore, section 3.2.2 states, “The firewall must be configured to block all unnecessary services, ports, protocols, and IP addresses.” References: PCI Card Production Logical Security Requirements, Card Production Security Assessor - Logical - Credly

all network transmissions must be logged by an entity’s security information and event management (SIEM) system or equivalent tool, which means they should record all network events and activities related to cardholder data processing and transmission. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that network transmissions are monitored and audited.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, the same AOC template is used for ROCs and SAQs. This is one of the requirements for ensuring consistency and accuracy in ROCs and SAQs.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, the intent of assigning a risk ranking to vulnerabilities is to prioritize the highest risk items so they can be addressed more quickly, rather than ensuring all vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days or replacing the need to quarterly ASV scans or ensuring that critical security patches are installed at least quarterly. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that vulnerabilities are identified and mitigated as soon as possible.

PCI DSS Requirement 12.10.1 requires entities to implement an incident response plan that includes roles, responsibilities, and communication and contact strategies for a data security incident, including notification of relevant payment brands1. This is important because each payment card brand has its own policies and procedures for dealing with a security breach, and failing to follow them or meet reporting deadlines could result in fines or loss of authority to process payment card transactions2. Therefore, an incident response plan must include procedures for notifying PCI SSC of the security incident, as well as any other entities that may require notification, whether by contract or law1. References:

• Guidance for PCI DSS Scoping and Network Segmentation
• Responding to a Cardholder Data Breach

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, track equivalent data on the chip of a payment card is sensitive authentication data, which means it can be used to authenticate a cardholder or a transaction, but it should not be stored or transmitted by merchants after authorization if encrypted. This is one of the requirements for preventing unauthorized access to sensitive authentication data.

PCI DSS Requirement 11.5 states that entities must deploy a change-detection mechanism (for example, file-integrity monitoring tools) to alert personnel to unauthorized modification of critical system files, configuration files, or content files; and configure the software to perform critical file comparisons at least weekly1. This is to ensure that any unauthorized or malicious changes to the files are detected and reported in a timely manner, and that the integrity and security of the files are maintained. Critical files are those that affect the security of the cardholder data environment (CDE), such as system files, application executables, configuration files, database files, and log files2. Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

The other options are not true regarding the frequency of critical file comparisons for a change-detection mechanism. Option B is not true because PCI DSS does not allow the entity to define the periodicity of the file comparisons, as it specifies a minimum frequency of at least weekly1. Option C is not true because PCI DSS does not limit the file comparisons to only after a valid change is installed, as it requires the file comparisons to be performed at least weekly regardless of the change status1. Option D is not true because PCI DSS does not allow the file comparisons to be performed at least monthly, as it requires a higher frequency of at least weekly1. References:

• PCI DSS v3.2.1
• File Integrity Monitoring Tools For PCI DSS

PCI DSS Requirement 9.1.1 requires entities to use appropriate facility entry controls to limit and monitor physical access to systems in the cardholder data environment (CDE)1. A badge access-control system is one example of such a control, as it can identify who entered and exited the server room and when. However, this control is only effective if it is protected from tampering or disabling by unauthorized persons, as PCI DSS Requirement 9.1.2 states1. Otherwise, the access-control system could be bypassed or compromised, allowing unauthorized access to the systems that store encrypted PAN data. Therefore, the badge access-control system must be protected from tampering or disabling, as stated in option A.

The other options are not true regarding PCI DSS physical security requirements for a server room. Option B is not true because PCI DSS does not mandate the use of video cameras in addition to the existing access-control system, although it is a recommended best practice2. Option C is not true because PCI DSS does not specify a data retention period for the access-control system, although it requires entities to retain audit trail history for at least one year, with a minimum of three months immediately available for analysis3. Option D is not true because PCI DSS does not require the use of motion-sensing alarms in addition to the existing access-control system, although it is another recommended best practice2. References:

• PCI DSS v3.2.1
• PCI DSS Requirement 9: Upping Your Physical Security
• PCI DSS Requirement 10: Track and Monitor All Access to Network Resources and Cardholder Data

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, intrusion detection techniques are required to alert personnel of suspected compromises that could compromise cardholder data or payment processing systems. This is one of the requirements for identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities that could compromise cardholder data.