SAP P_SAPEA_2023 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The customer's architecture guideline calls for following a "cloud-first" approach, but this does not mean that all solutions must be deployed in the cloud. In some cases, private cloud or on-premise options may be necessary to meet the customer's data protection requirements.

For example, if the customer's subsidiary in China requires that data be stored within China, then a private cloud solution in China may be the best option. Similarly, if the customer's other subsidiaries have different data protection requirements, then a hybrid solution that combines cloud and on-premise deployments may be necessary.

The Enterprise Architect must carefully consider the customer's specific requirements and constraints before making a decision about the deployment environment.

Here are some of the factors that the Enterprise Architect should consider:

The customer's data protection requirements: The Enterprise Architect must understand the customer's specific data protection requirements and ensure that any solution meets those requirements.

The availability of cloud-based solutions that meet the customer's requirements: Not all cloud-based solutions meet the same data protection requirements. The Enterprise Architect must ensure that the cloud-based solutions that are being considered meet the customer's requirements.

The cost of different deployment options: The Enterprise Architect must consider the cost of different deployment options, including cloud, private cloud, and on-premise.

The scalability and performance requirements of the solution: The Enterprise Architect must ensure that the solution meets the customer's scalability and performance requirements, regardless of the deployment environment.

By carefully considering all of these factors, the Enterprise Architect can make a decision about the deployment environment that meets the customer's specific requirements and constraints.

For the Chief Enterprise Architect at Wanderlust, it is crucial to map stakeholders according to their stance on the transformation project, which will inform the approach for engagement and communication. The categorization into proponents, opponents, enthusiasts, and resistors is based on the stakeholder's level of support and their readiness for change.

Here's the categorization based on the provided stakeholder feedback:

SCM SPP Application Owner in IT- Enthusiasts: This stakeholder has begun upskilling in S/4 HANA eSPP, indicating a positive attitude towards the transformation and readiness to embrace new systems.

Wanderlust Greenbush, Australia Plant Head- Opponents: The plant head discourages consolidation of instances due to the need for flexibility and frequent regulatory changes, showing resistance to the transformation project.

Wanderlust Europe Business Head- Promoters: The business head favors consolidation to improve end-to-end visibility of the battery supply chain, which indicates support for the transformation initiative.

Dealer Management Application Owner in IT- Resistors: Preferring continuity due to heavy customization and niche business requirements suggests resistance to change, likely driven by fear of losing position or control over the existing system.

For successful transformation, the Chief Enterprise Architect should actively engage with each type of stakeholder differently, working to mitigate concerns, leveraging enthusiasm, and turning opposition into support wherever possible.

There are a few reasons why you would recommend building SAP Side-by-Side Extensions to an S/4HANA system based on SAP BTP.

SAP BTP is a cloud-based platform, which means that extensions can be developed, deployed, and managed in the cloud. This makes it easy to scale and manage extensions, and it also makes it easier to collaborate with other developers.

SAP BTP provides a number of services that can be used to build extensions, such as SAP Cloud Platform Integration and SAP Cloud Platform Event Mesh. These services can help to make extensions more scalable, reliable, and secure.

SAP BTP supports a variety of programming languages, which means that developers can use the language they are most comfortable with. This can help to make the development process more efficient and productive.

In addition to these reasons, SAP BTP also allows extensions to maintain SAP user and security context and allow the use of S/4HANA eventing. This is important because it ensures that users are only able to access the data and functionality that they are authorized to access, and it also allows extensions to react to events that occur in S/4HANA.

Therefore, SAP BTP is a good choice for building SAP Side-by-Side Extensions to an S/4HANA system.

Extensions on SAP BTP can maintain SAP user and security context, which means that the extensions can use the same authentication and authorization mechanisms as the S/4HANA system and respect the user roles and permissions defined in the S/4HANA system.

Extensions on SAP BTP can use S/4HANA eventing, which means that the extensions can subscribe to business events that are triggered by the S/4HANA system and react to them accordingly. For example, an extension can listen to a sales order creation event and perform some additional logic or integration based on the event data.

Extensions on SAP BTP can leverage the SAP Cloud Platform Integration Suite and the SAP HANA Data Management Suite, which provide a comprehensive set of services and tools for different integration scenarios, such as process integration, data integration, analytics integration, user integration, and thing integration.

Extensions on SAP BTP can benefit from the cloud-native capabilities of SAP BTP, such as scalability, elasticity, availability, and security. Extensions on SAP BTP can also take advantage of the various programming languages, frameworks, and technologies supported by SAP BTP, such as Java, Node.js, Python, Go, PHP, CAP, or serverless functions.

Verified References: 6: