Salesforce JavaScript-Developer-I Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

We must understand pass-by-value for primitives in JavaScript.

Initial values:

let a = 10;

let b = a; // b gets a copy of the value 10

So:

a is 10

b is 10 (independent copy)

Function call:

changeValue(b);

Function definition:

function changeValue(param) {

param = 5;

}

param receives the value of b, which is 10.

Inside the function, param is a local variable .

param = 5; changes only this local copy.

It does not affect b outside the function.

After the function call:

a is still 10.

b is still 10.

Result:

const result = a + ' - ' + b;

a is 10.

b is 10.

String concatenation: ' 10 - 10 ' .

So result is:

" 10 - 10 "

Therefore, the correct option is:

Answer: D

Study Guide Concepts:

Primitive values (numbers, strings, booleans) are passed by value

Function parameters as local variables

String concatenation with +

Difference between mutating references vs primitives

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Errors thrown inside setTimeout callbacks occur asynchronously, in a different tick of the event loop. A try...catch around setTimeout itself (as in D) cannot catch errors thrown later in the scheduled callback.

To catch errors from countSheep() when it’s called asynchronously, the try...catch must wrap the call inside the timeout callback:

setTimeout(function() {

try {

countSheep();

} catch (e) {

handleError(e);

}

}, 1000);

B uses finally incorrectly and references e out of scope.

C is not valid JavaScript syntax.

D’s catch can only handle synchronous errors thrown before setTimeout returns, not those thrown inside the callback.

This question focuses on the typeof operator and how JavaScript represents the type of the value null.

Declaration on line 1:

let x = null;

Here:

x is explicitly assigned the value null.

In JavaScript, null is a special primitive value that represents “no value” or “empty value”.

Line 2:

console.log(typeof x);

The typeof operator returns a string indicating the type of the operand. For example:

typeof 1 returns " number "

typeof " hello " returns " string "

typeof true returns " boolean "

typeof undefined returns " undefined "

typeof {} returns " object "

typeof [] returns " object " (arrays are objects)

typeof function() {} returns " function "

For null, due to an early design decision in JavaScript, the result is:

typeof null === " object "

This is a known historical quirk of the language:

Although null is a primitive and conceptually means “no object”, typeof null returns the string " object " .

Therefore, typeof x when x is null evaluates to " object " .

So on line 2, the value printed is:

" object "

This matches option A.

The incorrect options are:

B. " undefined " : would be typeof x if x were undefined, not null.

C. " x " : typeof returns a string describing the type of the value, not the variable name.

D. " null " : although intuitive, JavaScript does not return " null " for typeof null; it returns " object " instead.

Therefore, the correct answer is:

Answer: A

JavaScript knowledge / study guide reference concepts:

typeof operator and its return values

Primitive types in JavaScript (null, undefined, number, string, boolean, symbol, bigint)

Historical behavior: typeof null returning " object "

Difference between null and undefined in JavaScript