Salesforce AP-209 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

This question tests the Maintenance Plan generation logic.

Option D is correct.The requirement isSingle Visit(One Appointment) forMultiple Assets.

One Work Order Line Item per Asset:This groups all the assets under asingleparent Work Order. Each asset gets its own line item (WOLI) for tracking purposes.

One Service Appointment per Work Order:This creates asingleappointment for the parent Work Order. The technician arrives once and works through the list of line items (Assets).

Option B("One Work Order per Asset") would create separate Work Orders (and likely separate Appointments) for every single asset, resulting in multiple visits or a cluttered schedule.

Option C("One SA per WOLI") would explicitly create a separate appointment for every single asset line item, causing massive double-booking/overlap.

This addresses the "Shift vs. Operating Hours" architecture.

Option B is correct.When a schedule hasno consistent weekly pattern, using standard Operating Hours (which repeat Mon-Sun indefinitely) is inefficient. The best practice is to assign the Service Territory Member (the resource) a "Shell" Operating Hours record that haszero time slots(No Availability).

You then useShiftsto define the specific working times for specific dates (e.g., "Nov 1st: 9am-2pm").

Because the base Operating Hours are empty, the Scheduling Engine looksonlyat the Shifts to determine availability. This avoids the conflict of having to "subtract" time from a standard day or constantly update the base record.

In Salesforce Field Service, the scheduling engine creates a list of "Qualified Candidates" based on Work Rules (Hard Constraints). If a search returns too many candidates, it places a heavy load on the CPU and can degrade optimization performance.

Option D is correctbecause Work Rules are the mechanism used to filter candidates. Adding rules likeMatch Territory(ensuring the resource belongs to the territory),Maximum Travel from Home(filtering out distant resources), orExtended Match(matching custom criteria) effectively reduces the pool of eligible techniciansbeforethe system attempts to score them. This improves the speed and quality of the schedule.

Option A is incorrect because Service Objectives are "Soft Constraints." Theyrankcandidates (giving them a score of 0-100) but do not remove them from the list.

Option B is a manual structural change that doesn't address the configuration issue.

Option C is incorrect because optimization performance is directly controlled by the efficiency of the configuration (Scheduling Policy).