Test Manager Advanced CTAL-TM Passing Score

Context Analysis:

The test strategy defines thContext Analysis:

Monitoring code coverage is inherently tied to knowledge of the internal structure of the software, a characteristic of white-box testing.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Black-box:

Incorrect. Black-box testing focuses on functionality without knowledge of internal structures.

B. White-box:

Correct. White-box testing uses internal code knowledge to determine areas that need more coverage.

C. Functional:

Incorrect. Functional testing assesses functionality without inspecting internal code.

D. Non-functional:

Incorrect. Non-functional testing focuses on performance, usability, etc., not code coverage.

Syllabus Alignment:

ISTQB associates code coverage monitoring with white-box testing techniques (TM-1.2.6).

Context Analysis:

Heavyweight risk-based techniques involve thorough, detailed analyses to identify and mitigate potential risks comprehensively.

Hazard analysis is a structured method to identify and address risks, commonly used in safety-critical domains.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Systematic software testing:

Incorrect. While methodical, it is not inherently a risk-based technique.

B. Pragmatic risk analysis:

Incorrect. This is a lightweight technique emphasizing practical application over detailed analysis.

C. Brainstorming:

Incorrect. While useful for generating ideas, it is not detailed enough to qualify as heavyweight.

D. Hazard analysis:

Correct. It is a formal and comprehensive approach, qualifying as a heavyweight technique.

Syllabus Alignment:

ISTQB highlights hazard analysis as a detailed, structured risk-based technique (TM-1.3.4).

Context Analysis:The question involves integrating an existing test automation framework into a CI/CD pipeline. The integration requires modifications to the framework and results reporting. This aligns with ISTQB Advanced Test Management concepts focusing on evaluating and adapting test tools for specific project needs (Syllabus reference: TM-1.6.1 and TM-1.6.4).

Evaluation of Options:

A. Investigation that the tool will be fit for purpose:

Correct. Before integrating the framework, a thorough investigation is necessary to confirm whether the tool can support the required modificationsand functionality. This aligns with the emphasis on ensuring tools meet both current and future needs as per the ISTQB syllabus section TM-1.6.1​​​.

B. Training regarding how to make the framework modifications so the integration is possible:

Incorrect. While training might be useful later, it is not the first step or the primary requirement to ensure the integration is feasible.

C. A review to determine if this is the best tool to use for the integration with the CI/CD pipeline:

Incorrect. This step might be relevant in an earlier phase of tool selection, but the question assumes the tool has already been chosen.

D. Investigation of the licensing models of the tool and an understanding of any potential costs:

Incorrect. Licensing investigation is part of tool selection and budgeting, not directly related to technical integration feasibility.

Syllabus Alignment:The ISTQB Advanced Level Test Management syllabus emphasizes the importance of ensuring the selected tools and technologies align with organizational requirements and technical feasibility. This is outlined in the "Test Tools" section of the syllabus (TM-1.6.1, TM-1.6.4).

Conclusion:The correct answer isA. Investigation that the tool will be fit for purpose, as this step ensures the technical requirements for integration are met before proceeding with modifications or training.

Context Analysis:

With limited time, testing all low-risk elements is not feasible. Depth testing on a representative low-risk element helps assess potential residual risk efficiently.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Automate the testing of the untested elements to ensure they are covered:

Incorrect. There isn’t enough time to implement automation.

B. Block the go-live and start testing the low-risk elements immediately:

Incorrect. Blocking the release may not be acceptable if high and medium risks are already mitigated.

C. Transfer the risk of the untested low-risk items to the help desk:

Incorrect. While a potential fallback, it doesn’t address residual risk proactively.

D. Select one of the low-risk elements and perform depth testing to assess the residual risk:

Correct. This provides quick insights into potential risks and helps make an informed go/no-go decision.

Syllabus Alignment:

ISTQB emphasizes prioritizing risk mitigation through targeted testing (TM-1.3.4).