An AWS Lambda function requires read access to an Amazon S3 bucket and requires read/write access to an Amazon DynamoDB table The correct 1AM policy already exists
What is the MOST secure way to grant the Lambda function access to the S3 bucket and the DynamoDB table?
A company has an Amazon S3 bucket that contains sensitive data. The data must be encrypted in transit and at rest. The company encrypts the data in the S3 bucket by using an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) key. A developer needs to grant several other AWS accounts the permission to use the S3 GetObject operation to retrieve the data from the S3 bucket.
How can the developer enforce that all requests to retrieve the data provide encryption in transit?
A developer is creating an AWS Lambda function that searches for items from an Amazon DynamoDB table that contains customer contact information- The DynamoDB table items have the customer's email_address as the partition key and additional properties such as customer_type, name, and job_tltle.
The Lambda function runs whenever a user types a new character into the customer_type text input The developer wants the search to return partial matches of all the email_address property of a particular customer_type The developer does not want to recreate the DynamoDB table.
What should the developer do to meet these requirements?
A company has an analytics application that uses an AWS Lambda function to process transaction data asynchronously A developer notices that asynchronous invocations of the Lambda function sometimes fail When failed Lambda function invocations occur, the developer wants to invoke a second Lambda function to handle errors and log details.
Which solution will meet these requirements?