CCISO 712-50 Passing Score

 COBIT as an Audit Framework:

COBIT provides a comprehensive framework for governance, management, and audit of IT processes, aligning IT goals with business objectives.

 Why This is Correct:

COBIT includes guidelines for auditors to evaluate IT controls and their effectiveness in achieving organizational objectives.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. PCI-DSS: Focuses on cardholder data security, not a comprehensive audit framework.

C. ISO 27002: Provides best practices for information security but not an audit framework.

D. NIST SP 800-30: Focuses on risk assessments, not audits.

 References:

EC-Council references COBIT as the preferred framework for conducting IT governance and audit activities.

 Purpose of ISO 27002:

ISO 27002 provides detailed guidance for implementing the controls outlined in ISO 27001, catering to security professionals managing organizational security.

 Why This is Correct:

Focuses on actionable recommendations for security implementation and management.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Common basis for standards: A broader goal, not the primary purpose.

C. Effective security management practice: A benefit, not the main objective.

D. Guidelines and general principles: Overlaps with ISO 27001, not ISO 27002.

 References:

EC-Council aligns ISO 27002 with practical recommendations for managing and maintaining information security systems.

 Role of the Incident Response Team (IRT):

The IRT is tasked with managing and mitigating security incidents, including securing networks and restoring operations.

Their responsibilities include identifying affected systems, containing breaches, and ensuring secure environments during and after incidents.

 Collaboration:

While other roles like the CISO provide oversight, the IRT performs hands-on incident management tasks.

 Supporting Reference:

EC-Council CCISO materials designate the IRT as the primary operational unit during incident response activities.

 Best Practices for Security Awareness Training:

Regular training ensures employees stay updated on emerging threats and reinforces secure behaviors.

 International Standards and Practices:

Most guidelines recommend annual training for all employees, regardless of the risk environment.

High-risk environments may benefit from supplementary training, but the baseline remains 12 months.

 Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. High-risk every 6 months: Not a standardized recommendation.

C. Every 18 months: Leaves gaps in awareness.

D. Every 6 months: Overly frequent and impractical for many organizations.

 References:

EC-Council and other industry standards align with providing security awareness training every 12 months to maintain effectiveness and practicality.