All PRINCE2-7-Practitioner Test Inside PRINCE2 Questions

The correct mapping is Statement 1 — F; Statement 2 — B; Statement 3 — A .

Statement 1 belongs in the commercial management approach because it concerns the commercial and sourcing arrangements for delivery. The use of an external supplier for most specialist work is a supplier and procurement consideration and therefore needs to be addressed through the project’s commercial management arrangements.

Statement 2 belongs in the benefits management approach because it specifies a measurable target, identifies how achievement will be monitored, and allocates responsibility for reviewing the resulting evidence. Although the target concerns sustainability, the statement is principally about how the target’s achievement will be measured and reviewed. Those arrangements are characteristic of benefits-management planning.

Statement 3 belongs in the business case because the committed funding relates directly to the investment required to undertake the project and therefore forms part of the project’s justification and financial basis.

The distractors serve different purposes. The sustainability management approach addresses how sustainability will be managed throughout the project; the end stage report records stage performance; and the project brief establishes the project’s initial foundation during starting up a project. The question tests the ability to distinguish closely related management products according to the specific information each is designed to control.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Business case practice; commercial management approach; benefits management approach; investment justification; management products.

===============

The correct answer is C — Project assurance . Project assurance exists to provide the project board with confidence that the project is being conducted appropriately and remains consistent with the interests represented by the board. Assurance includes reviewing whether plans remain realistic, feasible, aligned with agreed objectives, and suitable for supporting project-board decision-making.

Here, BuildyBrick has supplied new information showing that protecting historic buildings will increase the planned duration. Before relying on the revised plan, the project manager needs confidence that it remains appropriate from the perspective of both the project board and the wider business. Consulting project assurance is therefore appropriate because assurance can independently review the plan against agreed objectives, targets, tolerances, business justification, and applicable organizational requirements.

Option A is incorrect because the business layer establishes strategic direction and commissions the project rather than routinely reviewing detailed project planning changes on behalf of the board. Option B is concerned primarily with specialist product delivery at team level. Option D is plausible because the project executive represents the business interest, but the question specifically concerns checking that a revised plan meets project-board and business needs. That independent review and confidence-giving function is characteristic of project assurance.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Organization practice; project assurance; project board; project planning; business interest; initiating a project.

===============

The correct answer is B . PRINCE2 product-based planning determines the logical sequence of work by examining the products to be created and the dependencies between those products . Once those relationships are understood, activities or work packages that do not depend on one another can legitimately be scheduled in parallel.

In this scenario, the project manager and BuildyBrick’s planning specialist use the product flow together with historical information from previous projects. This is appropriate because the product flow provides the dependency logic, while previous project data can improve the realism of estimates and planning decisions. If the utilities and systems products are independent, separate work packages can therefore proceed concurrently.

Option A is incorrect because historical information should inform planning but cannot replace dependency analysis. A schedule should be derived from the logical relationships between products rather than copied mechanically from previous projects. Option C introduces a restriction that PRINCE2 does not impose: products delivered by the same supplier do not automatically need to be produced sequentially. Option D confuses tolerances , which establish delegated performance limits, with dependencies, which determine the logical production sequence.

The scenario is therefore a valid example of using product-based planning to identify opportunities for parallel delivery without compromising dependency logic.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Plans practice; product-based planning; product flow; dependencies; scheduling; work packages; lessons from previous projects.

===============

The correct answer is B — Project executive . Selecting the project approach is an activity within the starting up a project process. The approach establishes the overall way in which the project’s products will be created and delivered, including considerations such as delivery method, sourcing, specialist techniques, and relevant organizational or commercial constraints.

The project manager performs substantial analysis and coordination in developing the proposed approach, drawing on specialist advice where required. However, the question specifically asks which role is accountable . Accountability rests with the project executive , who is ultimately accountable for the project’s success and for ensuring that the chosen approach is compatible with the business justification, organizational environment, and project mandate.

Option C is attractive because the project manager has operational responsibility for preparing and developing many elements of the project approach. However, responsibility for performing an activity and accountability for ensuring its appropriate outcome are distinct concepts. Option D is also too narrow: the senior supplier provides important specialist expertise concerning feasibility and delivery, but represents the supplier interest rather than holding overall accountability. Option A establishes the wider organizational direction but does not own this project-level decision.

The executive therefore remains accountable while drawing on the project manager and specialist supplier expertise to establish a viable approach.

PRINCE2 7 reference topics: Starting up a project; select the project approach; project executive accountability; project manager responsibility; supplier expertise.

===============