Which of the following ESG investing approaches aims to drive positive change in the way investee companies are governed and managed?
Impact investing
Active ownership
Positive alignment
Active ownership refers to the practice where investors use their rights and positions as shareholders to influence the governance and behavior of companies. This approach aims to drive positive changes in the way investee companies are governed and managed, often focusing on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) factors.
Step-by-Step Explanation:
Definition and Purpose:
Active Ownership: Involves engaging with company management and using voting rights to influence corporate practices. The aim is to improve company performance on ESG factors which can lead to long-term value creation and risk mitigation.
According to the CFA Institute, active ownership is a key strategy for investors to address ESG issues by directly engaging with companies and voting on shareholder resolutions.
Mechanisms of Influence:
Engagement: This involves direct dialogue with company management to address ESG issues, set targets, and track progress.
Proxy Voting: Investors use their voting rights to support or oppose management proposals and shareholder resolutions related to ESG practices.
The MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology also highlights the role of active ownership in managing ESG risks and opportunities, emphasizing that investors can drive improvements through sustained engagement and voting strategies.
Impact on Governance and Management:
Governance Improvements: Active ownership can lead to better governance practices, such as improved board diversity, enhanced transparency, and stronger accountability.
Management Practices: Through active ownership, investors can encourage companies to adopt sustainable business practices, improve labor conditions, and reduce environmental impacts.
Case Studies and Examples:
Several studies and real-world examples illustrate the effectiveness of active ownership. For instance, engagements by large institutional investors like pension funds have led to significant changes in corporate policies and practices related to climate change, human rights, and executive compensation.
ESG Frameworks and Standards:
The CFA Institute's ESG Investing guide provides detailed frameworks for integrating active ownership into investment strategies. These include guidelines on effective engagement, proxy voting policies, and case studies demonstrating the impact of active ownership on company performance.
References:
CFA Institute, "Environmental, Social, and Governance Issues in Investing: A Guide for Investment Professionals."
MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology documents, which describe the role of active ownership in addressing ESG risks and opportunities.
The offering of indexes and passive funds with ESG integration by asset managers
preceded the offering of actively managed ESG funds
occurred at the same time as the offering of actively managed ESG funds.
followed the offering of actively managed ESG funds
The offering of indexes and passive funds with ESG integration by asset managers followed the offering of actively managed ESG funds. Initially, ESG investing was primarily driven by active management strategies, with passive ESG funds emerging later as demand grew.
Initial Focus on Active Management: Early ESG investing efforts were concentrated in actively managed funds, where managers could apply detailed ESG analysis and make discretionary investment decisions based on ESG criteria.
Development of ESG Indexes: As ESG data and methodologies improved, index providers began creating ESG-focused indexes. This allowed for the development of passive investment products that track these indexes, offering investors broad ESG exposure.
Market Demand and Growth: The growing interest in ESG investing led to the expansion of passive ESG funds, providing a cost-effective way for investors to integrate ESG factors into their portfolios. These funds have since gained significant traction in the market.
References:
MSCI ESG Ratings Methodology (2022) - Discusses the evolution of ESG investing and the initial focus on active management before the introduction of passive ESG funds.
ESG-Ratings-Methodology-Exec-Summary (2022) - Highlights the timeline of ESG fund offerings and the subsequent growth of passive ESG investment products.
Which of the following is an example of a just’ transition with regards to climate change?
A company issues a first transition bond to finance a gas-fired power utility project
A manufacturer designs products that are more reusable and recyclable to support the circular economy
A government works with labor unions to develop a social package for displaced workers due to closure of coal mines
A just transition with regards to climate change refers to ensuring that the shift to a low-carbon economy is fair and inclusive, particularly for workers and communities that are adversely affected by this transition. Here’s why option C is correct:
Just Transition:
A just transition involves measures that support workers and communities who are impacted by the transition to a sustainable economy. This includes creating new job opportunities, providing retraining programs, and ensuring social protections for those affected by changes such as the closure of coal mines.
Collaborating with labor unions to develop a social package for displaced workers is a clear example of this approach, as it directly addresses the social and economic challenges faced by workers during the transition .
Other Options:
Option A (financing a gas-fired power utility project) does not address the social aspects of the transition and is more focused on the financial and infrastructural changes.
Option B (designing reusable and recyclable products) is aligned with the circular economy but does not specifically address the social justice aspect of the transition .
CFA ESG Investing References:
The CFA Institute’s ESG curriculum includes discussions on the importance of a just transition, emphasizing the need for policies and initiatives that protect workers and communities during the shift to a sustainable economy .
Which of the following investor types most likely has the shortest investment time horizon?
Foundations
General insurers
Defined benefit pension schemes
General insurers typically have the shortest investment time horizon among the three investor types listed. Here’s a detailed explanation:
Nature of Liabilities: General insurers deal with short-term liabilities, such as claims arising from accidents, natural disasters, or other events that can happen frequently and require prompt payment. This necessitates a relatively liquid and short-term investment portfolio to ensure that funds are readily available to cover claims.
Investment Strategies: Due to the need to maintain liquidity and manage risk, general insurers often invest in short-duration assets. These might include short-term bonds, money market instruments, and other liquid assets that can be quickly converted to cash.
Comparison with Other Investors:
Foundations: Foundations typically have longer-term investment horizons as they aim to support their missions over an extended period. Their endowment funds are managed to generate returns that can sustain operations and grant-making activities in perpetuity.
Defined Benefit Pension Schemes: These pension schemes also have long-term horizons, as they need to ensure that funds are available to meet the retirement benefits of employees over many years, often several decades.
CFA ESG Investing References:
The CFA Institute explains that general insurers have shorter investment horizons due to the nature of their liabilities and the need for liquidity to pay out claims promptly (CFA Institute, 2020).
The institute also notes that the investment strategies of general insurers are designed to align with their short-term liabilities, making their investment horizon shorter compared to foundations and pension schemes.
=================
Copyright © 2021-2025 CertsTopics. All Rights Reserved