PSPO-I Exam Dumps : Professional Scrum Product Owner (PSPO I) Exam

The Scrum Team can maintain the Product Backlog to maximize its transparency by continually keeping it up to date with the most recent insights because:

• It reflects the current state of the product and the work. The Product Backlog is a dynamic and emergent artifact that represents all the possible features, functions, requirements, enhancements, and fixes that constitute changes to the product. By updating it frequently, the Scrum Team can ensure that the Product Backlog is accurate, complete, and relevant.
• It enables the Product Owner to optimize the value of the product and the work of the Scrum Team. The Product Owner is accountable for effective Product Backlog management, which includes ordering, refining, and communicating the Product Backlog items. By updating it frequently, the Product Owner can incorporate new learnings, feedback, opportunities, and changes into the product decisions and priorities.
• It supports the inspection and adaptation of the Scrum Team and the stakeholders. The Product Backlog is a source of information and transparency for everyone involved in the product development. By updating it frequently, the Scrum Team and the stakeholders can inspect the progress and outcomes of each Sprint, and adapt their plans and actions accordingly.

References:

• Scrum Guide 2020, page 10: “The Product Backlog is an emergent, ordered list of what is needed to improve the product.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 11: “The Product Owner is accountable for effective Product Backlog management, which includes … ensuring that the Product Backlog is transparent, visible and understood.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 11: “The ordering of the items in the Product Backlog is the sole responsibility of the Product Owner. They order Product Backlog items to best achieve goals and missions.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 11: “Higher ordered Product Backlog items are clearer and more refined than lower ordered ones.”
• Scrum Guide 2020, page 15: “The Sprint Review is an informal meeting, not a status meeting, and the presentation of the Increment is intended to elicit feedback and foster collaboration.”

The Sprint Retrospective is an event for the Scrum Team to inspect how the last Sprint went with regards to individuals, interactions, processes, tools, and their Definition of Done1. The purpose of the Sprint Retrospective is to plan ways to increase quality and effectiveness for the next Sprint2. Therefore, appropriate topics for discussion during a Sprint Retrospective are:

Identifying high priority process improvements for the next Sprint. The Scrum Team should identify the most important things that went well and the potential improvements, and create a plan for implementing some of them in the next Sprint[3][3]. This way, the Scrum Team can continuously improve their performance and deliver more value.

How the team collaborates. The Scrum Team should reflect on how they work together as a self-managing unit, and how they can enhance their skills, tools, and relationships4. This way, the Scrum Team can foster a culture of trust, respect, and collaboration.

The other options are not appropriate topics for discussion during a Sprint Retrospective, as they are either related to the Product Backlog or the Sprint Backlog, which are not the focus of the Sprint Retrospective. The order of items in the Product Backlog is the responsibility of the Product Owner, who manages the Product Backlog based on the value, risk, and dependencies of the items5. The Product Owner may seek input from the Scrum Team or the stakeholders, but the final decision is up to the Product Owner. Documenting acceptance criteria for items in the next Sprint is part of the Product Backlog refinement, which is an ongoing activity throughout the Sprint, not a specific event. The Scrum Team should collaborate on refining the Product Backlog items and adding more details, such as acceptance criteria, as they become more clear and ready for selection in a Sprint Planning.

References:

1: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 14

2: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 15

[3][3]: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 15

4: Developing People and Teams, Scrum.org, accessed on December 16, 2023

5: The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 7

 The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 10

 The Scrum Guide, November 2020, p. 10

 Understanding and Applying the Scrum Framework, Scrum.org, accessed on December 16, 2023

The reasons why it is important that there is only one Product Owner per product are:

• It is clear who is accountable for the ultimate value of the product. The Product Owner is accountable for maximizing the value of the product resulting from the work of the Scrum Team. They are responsible for identifying and articulating the Product Goal, which is a long-term objective for the product that guides all the activities of the Scrum Team.
• It helps avoid barriers to effective communication and rapid decision-making. The Product Owner is the sole person responsible for managing the Product Backlog, which is an emergent, ordered list of what is needed to improve the product. They must ensure that the Product Backlog is transparent, visible, and understood by everyone who needs to work on it. They must also collaborate with the Developers and the stakeholders to refine, order, and prioritize the Product Backlog items based on value and impact.
• The Scrum Team always knows who determines the order of the Product Backlog. The Product Owner has the final authority to decide what items are more important and valuable for the product. They must communicate this order clearly and consistently to the Scrum Team and the stakeholders. They must also respect and support the self-management of the Developers in choosing how best to accomplish their work.

Other options, such as the Scrum Master knowing who acts as their backup while on vacation or it would confuse the stakeholders if they had to work with more than one person, are not valid reasons why it is important that there is only one Product Owner per product. They may reflect a misunderstanding of the roles and accountabilities of the Scrum Team or the stakeholders.

References:

• [Scrum Guide], page 6, section “Product Owner”
• [Scrum Guide], page 11, section “Product Backlog”
• [Scrum Guide], page 12, section “Product Backlog Refinement”
• [Scrum Guide], page 11, section “Product Backlog”
• [Scrum Guide], page 7, section “Developers”