NSE5_FNC_AD_7.6 Exam Dumps : Fortinet NSE 5 - FortiNAC-F 7.6 Administrator

The correct answer is A . In a FortiNAC-F 1+1 HA deployment, failover from primary to secondary is automatic, but failback to the primary is not automatic . The study guide states that if the primary device or its network connectivity fails, the secondary assumes control automatically, but restoration of a failed-over HA deployment is a manual administrator-driven process. It further explains that after the cause of the failover is resolved, the administrator must use the Resume Control button to transfer control back to the primary server.

That means when the primary comes back online, it does not immediately take over again. The pair can resume HA communication, but the secondary remains the in-control node until an administrator deliberately returns control to the primary. Option B is wrong because FortiNAC-F 1+1 HA is active-passive, not load-balanced. Option C is wrong because the restored primary does not power itself down for maintenance. Option D is a trap: five failed heartbeats are used in failure detection and gateway validation logic, not as an automatic failback timer. The exam point is simple: automatic failover, manual failback .

Questions no:9

Verified Answer: B

Comprehensive and Detailed 250 to 300 words each Explanation with Exact Matched Extract from FortiNAC-F Administrator library and documentation for current versions (including F 7.2, 7.4, and 7.6) documents:

In FortiNAC-F, the integration with FortiGate for Security Fabric and Single Sign-On (FSSO) allows the system to communicate the access level of an endpoint directly to the firewall usingfirewall tags. This eliminates the need for complex VLAN steering in some environments by allowing the FortiGate to apply policies based on these dynamic tags instead of just a physical or virtual network segment.

The actual assignment of the firewall tag value occurs within aLogical Network. In the FortiNAC-F architectural model, a Logical Network acts as a container for " Access Values " . When an administrator configures a Logical Network (located underNetwork > Logical Networks), they define what that network represents—such as " Corporate Access " or " Contractor Limited " . Within that definition, they assign the specificFirewall Tagthat matches the tag created on the FortiGate. Once a user or host matches aNetwork Access Policy, FortiNAC-F identifies the associated Logical Network and pushes the defined tag to the FortiGate via the FSSO connector.

It is important to note that whileNetwork Access Policies(and by extensionSecurity Rules) are the logic engines thattriggerthe assignment, they do not hold the tag value itself. They simply point to a Logical Network, which serves as the central repository for that specific access configuration.

" To assign firewall tags, navigate toNetwork > Logical Networks. Select the desired logical network and clickEdit. Under theAccess Valuesection, selectFirewall Tagas the type and enter the tag name exactly as it appears on the FortiGate. When a Network Access Policy matches a host, FortiNAC sends this tag to the FortiGate as an FSSO message. " —FortiNAC-F Administration Guide: Logical Networks and Security Fabric Integration.

The correct answer is A . The exhibit shows two adapters learned on the same wired port: one appears as a rogue/unknown host, and the other is associated with the Lab Hosts rule. The port is in both Role-Based Access and Forced Registration . FortiNAC-F state-based control takes precedence over policy-based provisioning, and the study guide states that when a rogue host connects to a port in the Forced Registration group, FortiNAC-F isolates that host by moving it into the registration captive network. The guide also explains that the Isolation network can be used as a single network for abnormal host states while still presenting state-specific portal pages.

Because this is a wired switch port using VLAN-based control, FortiNAC-F cannot put one host on the production VLAN and the other host on the isolation portal VLAN at the same time on the same access port. The VLAN change applies to the port, not independently to each MAC address behind that port. Therefore, the presence of the rogue host on a Forced Registration port causes the port to be provisioned to the isolation network. Option B is technically unrealistic for this access-port scenario. Option C is wrong because two MAC addresses alone do not make the port an uplink; FortiNAC-F uses uplink logic for infrastructure-device MACs, manually marked uplinks, or a threshold such as more than 20 MAC addresses. Option D is unrelated because Access Point Management is not triggered by learning two wired hosts on a port.