HPE6-A84 Exam Dumps : Aruba Certified Network Security Expert Written Exam

 This is because this URI specifies the exact attribute that contains the number of access rejects from the RADIUS server, which is the information that the NAE script needs to monitor and trigger an alert.

A. /rest/v1/system/vrfs/mgmt/radius/servers/cp.acnsxtest.local/2083/tcp?attributes=authstatistics. This is not the correct URI because it returns the entire authstatistics object, which contains more information than the access rejects, such as access accepts, challenges, timeouts, etc. This might make the NAE script more complex and inefficient to parse and process the data.

B. /rest/v1/system/vrfs/mgmt/radius/servers/cp.acnsxtest.local/2083/tcp?attributes=authstatistics?attributes=access_rejects. This is not a valid URI because it has two question marks, which is a syntax error. The question mark is used to indicate the start of the query string, which can have one or more parameters separated by ampersands. The correct way to specify multiple attributes is to use a comma-separated list after the question mark, such as ?attributes=attr1,attr2,attr3.

C. /rest/v1/system/vrfs/mgmt/radius/_servers/cp.acnsxtest.local/2083/tcp. This is not a valid URI because it has an extra underscore before servers, which is a typo. The correct resource name is servers, not _servers. Moreover, this URI does not specify any attributes, which means it will return the default attributes of the RADIUS server object, such as name, port, protocol, etc., but not the authstatistics or access_rejects.

7of30

The correct answer is D. Enabling alerts and email notifications for events related to gateway IPS engine utilization and errors.

Gateway IDS/IPS is a feature that allows the Aruba gateways to monitor and block malicious or unwanted traffic based on predefined or custom rules 1. The Fail Strategy is a setting that determines how the gateways handle traffic when the IPS engine fails or crashes 2. The Block option means that the gateways will stop forwarding traffic until the IPS engine recovers, while the Bypass option means that the gateways will continue forwarding traffic without inspection 2.

The Block option provides more security, but it also increases the risk of network outages if the IPS engine fails frequently or for a long time 2. To minimize this risk, it is recommended to enable alerts and email notifications for events related to gateway IPS engine utilization and errors 3. This way, the network administrators can be informed of any issues with the IPS engine and take appropriate actions to restore or troubleshoot it 3.

The other options are not correct or relevant for this issue:

• Option A is not correct because configuring a relatively high threshold for the gateway threat count alerts would not help minimize unexpected outages caused by using the Block option. The gateway threat count alerts are used to notify the network administrators of the number of threats detected by the IPS engine, but they do not affect how the gateways handle traffic when the IPS engine fails 4.
• Option B is not correct because making sure that the gateways have formed a cluster and operate in default gateway mode would not help minimize unexpected outages caused by using the Block option. The gateway cluster mode is used to provide high availability and load balancing for the gateways, but it does not affect how the gateways handle traffic when the IPS engine fails . The default gateway mode is used to enable routing and NAT functions on the gateways, but it does not affect how the gateways handle traffic when the IPS engine fails .
• Option C is not correct because setting the IDS or IPS policy to the least restrictive option, Lenient, would not help minimize unexpected outages caused by using the Block option. The IDS or IPS policy is used to define what rules are applied by the IPS engine to inspect and block traffic, but it does not affect how the gateways handle traffic when the IPS engine fails 2. The Lenient option contains fewer and older rules than the Moderate or Strict options, which means that it provides less security and more false negatives .

The UBT solution requires that the VLAN assignments for the wired clients are done by the gateway, not by the switch. Therefore, the role configurations on the gateways should not have any VLAN assignments, as they would override the VLAN 20 that is specified in the enforcement profile. Instead, the role configurations should only have policies that define the access rights for the clients in the “eth-internet” role. This way, the gateway can assign the clients to VLAN 20 and apply the appropriate policies based on their role1