FCSS_SDW_AR-7.6 Exam Dumps : FCSS - SD-WAN 7.6 Architect

In FortiOS 7.6, static routes can reference either:

an SD-WAN zone (for example, virtual-wan-link or a user-defined SD-WAN zone), or

a specific SD-WAN member interface that belongs to that zone.

However, FortiOS enforces a routing constraint to avoid ambiguity during route resolution. Two static routes cannot have the same destination prefix if one points to an SD-WAN zone and the other points to an SD-WAN member within that zone. This would create an overlapping and conflicting forwarding decision.

Therefore, if you configure:

one static route that references an SD-WAN zone, and

another static route that references an SD-WAN member belonging to that same zone,

the destination subnets of the two static routes must be different.

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option A is incorrect because FortiOS does allow static routes that reference individual SD-WAN members.

Option B is incorrect because static routes can reference SD-WAN zones.

Option D is incorrect because static routing decisions in FortiOS are based on destination prefixes, not source prefixes.

Thus, the correct answer is C.

The log shows messages on HUB1-VPN1 where the device processes a SHORTCUT_QUERY and performs NAT hole punching (peer at 192.2.0.1:4500). This indicates that the device is acting as a hub, helping two spokes (192.2.0.1 and 10.0.3.101) establish a direct ADVPN shortcut tunnel between each other, instead of routing their traffic through the hub.

From the SD-WAN service configuration, rule edit 3 (name "Corp") is configured with:

set mode sla

set load-balance enable

set dst "Corp-net"

set src "LAN-net"

SLA checks referenced under config sla

Traffic from 10.0.1.101 to 10.0.0.126 matches this rule because the destination is within the corporate network range (shown in the policy-route/proute output as destination 10.0.0.0–10.255.255.255 for the Corp service).

In the diagnose firewall proute list output for vwl_service=3 (Corp), FortiGate shows which SD-WAN members are eligible based on SLA pass results:

oif=21 (HUB1-VPN3) num_pass=2

oif=20 (HUB1-VPN2) num_pass=0

oif=19 (HUB1-VPN1) num_pass=0

This indicates that, for the SLA-based rule, only HUB1-VPN3 is meeting the SLA requirements (it is the only member with num_pass=2). The other members have num_pass=0, so they are not eligible for forwarding under this SLA rule even though links are up.

The sniffer trace further corroborates the forwarding decision by showing the traffic egressing through HUB1-VPN3.

Therefore, FortiGate will steer the HTTP traffic through only HUB1-VPN3, which corresponds to Option A.