CTFL_Syll2018 Exam Dumps : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level (Syllabus 2018)

 Frequency 0, 1, 5, 6; Duration 0, 1, 30, 60, 61 is the correct test set of valid and invalid boundary values applying 2-value boundary value analysis1 . Boundary value analysis is a technique that tests the values at and near the boundaries of an input domain or output range1 . A 2-value boundary value analysis tests two values for each boundary: one valid value and one invalid value1 . For Frequency, the valid boundaries are 1 and 5, so the test set should include one valid value (1 or 5) and one invalid value (0 or 6) for each boundary. For Duration, the valid boundaries are 1 and 60, so the test set should include one valid value (1 or 60) and one invalid value (0 or 61) for each boundary. The other options are incorrect test sets of valid and invalid boundary values applying 2-value boundary value analysis. Option A only includes valid values for each boundary, but not invalid values. Option B includes invalid values that are not adjacent to the boundaries (59 seconds and 60 minutes 1 second). Option D includes more than two values for each boundary (0, 1, 2 for Frequency; 0, 1, 30 for Duration).

Provides developers with information to isolate the failure is the incident report objective that this excerpt satisfies, because it gives details about how to recreate the failure using a specific test file and location . An incident report is a document that records any event that deviates from the expected or desired behaviour of the software under test . One of its objectives is to provide developers with information to isolate the failure, which means to identify and locate the cause of the failure in the software . The other options are not incident report objectives that this excerpt satisfies. Option B is wrong, because this excerpt does not belong to an incident report, but rather to a test report. A test report is a document that summarizes the results and outcomes of testing activities . Option C is wrong, because this excerpt does not provide project managers with information on the project risks, which means to identify and assess the potential threats or uncertainties that may affect the project objectives or outcomes . Option D is wrong, because this excerpt does not provide test managers with information to report test progress, which means to measure and communicate how much of the planned testing activities have been completed or remain to be done .

Multiple condition coverage is a structure-based test technique that aims to achieve a high level of coverage by testing all possible combinations of conditions and outcomes in each decision point of the code or design of the system under test. Multiple condition coverage verifies that each condition in a decision point has an effect on the outcome and that there are no hidden defects or logical errors in the code or design. Multiple condition coverage requires some knowledge of the internal structure or implementation of the system under test; it focuses on how the system does what it does rather than what it does. Multiple condition coverage is one of the most rigorous and complex structure-based test techniques because it can generate a large number of test cases for each decision point, especially if there are many conditions involved. You can find more information about multiple condition coverage in [A Study Guide to the ISTQB® Foundation Level 2018 Syllabus], Chapter 4, Section 4.3.