CTFL_Syll2018 Exam Dumps : ISTQB Certified Tester Foundation Level (Syllabus 2018)

 Test objectives are specific goals or targets that define what testing activities should achieve or accomplish1. Test objectives for systems testing of a safety critical system include completion of all outstanding defect correction. Regression testing is required following defect correction at all test levels. Therefore, to determine whether this test objective has been met, two metrics that would be most suitable are:

• Regression tests run and passed in systems testing: This metric measures how many regression tests have been executed and passed in systems testing1. Regression testing is a type of testing that verifies that previously tested software still performs correctly after changes or defect corrections1. This metric can indicate whether all outstanding defect corrections have been completed and verified in systems testing.
• Incidents raised and closed at all levels of testing: This metric measures how many incidents have been reported and resolved at all levels of testing1. An incident is any event occurring during testing that requires investigation1. This metric can indicate whether all defects have been identified and corrected at all levels of testing.

 Having the company’s independent test team design and execute the tests would achieve the highest level of testing independence for a project’s test level, because it would reduce the bias and influence of the developers or other stakeholders who are involved in the software development1 . An independent test team can provide a different perspective and focus on testing activities without being affected by development pressures or deadlines1 . The other options would not achieve the highest level of testing independence for a project’s test level. Option A is not a good option, because training developers to design good tests for the test team to execute would still introduce some bias and influence from the developers’ point of view1 . Option C is not a good option, because minimizing contact between testers and developers during test design to avoid bias would reduce the communication and collaboration that are essential for effective testing and defect resolution1 . Option D is not a good option, because outsourcing test design and execution to a different company would introduce some risks and challenges such as contractual issues, cultural differences, or loss of control over quality

The statement that use case testing is designed to find defects in the process flow is true, because use case testing is a technique that tests the end-to-end user interactions and outcomes based on use cases or scenarios that describe how the software under test should be used . Use case testing can help to find defects in the process flow, such as missing steps, incorrect sequences, or invalid transitions . The other options are not true statements about use case testing. Option A is false, because use case testing is not designed to be used by real users, but rather by professional testers who design and execute test cases based on use cases or scenarios . Option C is false, because use case testing is not designed to find defects in the data flow, but rather in the process flow. Data flow testing is a different technique that tests how data values are defined, used, and modified by the software under test . Option D is false, because use case testing is not always designed by customers or end users, but rather by testers who analyse the requirements or specifications of the software under test to identify use cases or scenarios .